The bleeding obvious?

Talk about stating the bleeding obvious (linky)...

BanIndians killing Test Cricket

"Dead pitches killing Tests in India

Why mouth platitudes about the sanctity of Test cricket when matches are played on pitches designed to drag the game off to the post-mortem table?"

Love this line...

"This is a series where the No. 1 ranking is at stake. You'd think that results mattered. But while Australia, South Africa and Sri Lanka leave little to chance as they pursue that ambition, India are content with being world leaders: at signing TV deals and producing bog-standard pitches."

you cant kill whats already dead.

The sooner Pakistan gets a nuke(well one that works) the better.

Just when you thought bradders couldn't get any loonier . . . FFS

Hello Trollmeister.

Bradman wrote:The sooner Pakistan gets a nuke(well one that works) the better.

Eek!! Harsh in the extreme. Remind me not to vote for you if you go into Politics, qmy.

Unlikely to happen skulls. Vote for the trollmeister. Whack jobs like him are bound to gather a small deluded crowd. In fact he could run on a joint ticket with buckwit. The bumper stickers would be cool:

"Vote for tac. I haven't got a clue but I'll jump in every second day or so and tell you you're wrong"

bradders doing his impersonation of Pavlov's dog . . .

Yeah what's your excuse? Though you could tell me in Russian seeing as your forte seems to be foreign languages.

Actually Russian wouldn't be right as you forte seems to be dead languages. Aramaic this time tac. Perhaps Blackfoot Indian?

Get a room, you two.

skully wrote:Get a room, you two.

Only if I've got my rabies shot skulls.

you started getting periods ?

Bradman wrote:Unlikely to happen skulls. Vote for the trollmeister. Whack jobs like him are bound to gather a small deluded crowd. In fact he could run on a joint ticket with buckwit. The bumper stickers would be cool:

"Vote for tac. I haven't got a clue but I'll jump in every second day or so and tell you you're wrong"

now what in hell have I done to you ..

except speak the truth i.e.

Bradman wrote:The sooner Pakistan gets a nuke(well one that works) the better.

Eh? You have inside information that none of the 50 + (at least) nukes that Pakistan is already supposed to possess are in working condition?

furriner wrote:

Bradman wrote:The sooner Pakistan gets a nuke(well one that works) the better.

Eh? You have inside information that none of the 50 + (at least) nukes that Pakistan is already supposed to possess are in working condition?

He's working on the premise that none of them can reach Australia...

furriner wrote:

Bradman wrote:The sooner Pakistan gets a nuke(well one that works) the better.

Eh? You have inside information that none of the 50 + (at least) nukes that Pakistan is already supposed to possess are in working condition?

the mafia boss may have 50 guns, but you still gotta take him out if he crosses the line.

moreover I do not think the majority of those nukes are high tonnage, most will be tactical battlefield types only. With a few being 10kt or so.
they don't have the testing history or research/industrial base to build high output fission devices.

India is an impotent and soft nation, and incapable of protecting their citizens both within and outside.

JKLever wrote:

furriner wrote:

Bradman wrote:The sooner Pakistan gets a nuke(well one that works) the better.

Eh? You have inside information that none of the 50 + (at least) nukes that Pakistan is already supposed to possess are in working condition?

He's working on the premise that none of them can reach Australia...

I believe they're working on the distance thingie.

buckSH wrote:

furriner wrote:

Bradman wrote:The sooner Pakistan gets a nuke(well one that works) the better.

Eh? You have inside information that none of the 50 + (at least) nukes that Pakistan is already supposed to possess are in working condition?

the mafia boss may have 50 guns, but you still gotta take him out if he crosses the line.

moreover I do not think the majority of those nukes are high tonnage, most will be tactical battlefield types only. With a few being 10kt or so.
they don't have the testing history or research/industrial base to build high output fission devices.

India is an impotent and soft nation, and incapable of protecting their citizens both within and outside.

50 guns is a bit different from 50 nukes though.

And as for Pakistani nuke tonnage, I really have no clue.

Don't worry Aussies, we'll defend you.

Possibly to the last Australian?

Preferably rather than possibly.

Mind you, it's always good to see the myth of the ANZACs being propagated again. If only those 80,000 British casualties had realised that so many Aussies and Kiwis were in front of them.

Hehehe, typical FB thread. Starts off talking about flat decks in India killing Test Cricket, and morphs into nuclear war chat.

skully wrote:Hehehe, typical FB thread. Starts off talking about flat decks in India killing Test Cricket, and morphs into nuclear war chat.

It's so inane.

Hehehe. Don't let the man beat you down, Smerky.

I like your inane posts.