Flaming Bails
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Aus Federal Politics thread (III)

+17
Leo
WideWally
Zat
Hass
G.Wood
lardbucket
Mick Sawyer
horace
Invader Zim
Bradman
bodyline
skully
embee
Paul Keating
JGK
Big Dog
taipan
21 posters

Page 39 of 40 Previous  1 ... 21 ... 38, 39, 40  Next

Go down

Aus Federal Politics thread (III) - Page 39 Empty Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)

Post by JGK Thu 06 Oct 2011, 08:35

Big Dog wrote:
JGK wrote:What is? Stamp Duty or Land Tax?

Stamp duty on the transfer of land is utter theft however all sides of politics are guilty of exploiting it. If i buy a house with my own money, why should i have to hand over 20-30 grand to the farking government. They provide no goods, no services....nothing. Its legalised theft & always has been.

I agree that transactions taxes generally are a really stupid idea in a modern economy. However, the market has already priced in stamp duty and to abolish it now would just create more winners and losers with associated equity problems.

As I mentioned, if you could replace it with a broad based land tax then I would be happy to abolish it but then you would need some grandfathering for people who already own property (and paid the stamp duty).

JGK


Number of posts : 41790
Reputation : 161
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : jnt

Back to top Go down

Aus Federal Politics thread (III) - Page 39 Empty Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)

Post by Mick Sawyer Thu 06 Oct 2011, 08:37

JGK wrote:Stamp Duty on real property should still remain or at least be converted to an ongoing land tax (even on family homes).



Not with a 15% GST.

Housing is ridiculously overpriced/undersupplied in oz. Disincentives such duty, tax, $100k + per block local government fees do nothing for housing affordability or availability.
Mick Sawyer
Mick Sawyer


Number of posts : 7267
Reputation : 21
Registration date : 2007-09-11
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Aus Federal Politics thread (III) - Page 39 Empty Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)

Post by lardbucket Thu 06 Oct 2011, 08:39

JGK wrote:But you and the rest of the Tories accept that the Greens in particular are economic vandals whose views will often be against the greater good of the nation.

So it isn't hard to see an instance where a tax policy reform that is ostensibly a good one might be opposed by the Greens with their socialist agenda. In that instance, only the Opposition would be to blame for voting down a good reform.

Anyway, as I said, the thread has moved on.



sh!t, you're not going merlo on us?

lardbucket


Number of posts : 38125
Reputation : 173
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Aus Federal Politics thread (III) - Page 39 Empty Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)

Post by JGK Thu 06 Oct 2011, 08:43

Mick Sawyer wrote:
JGK wrote:Stamp Duty on real property should still remain or at least be converted to an ongoing land tax (even on family homes).



Not with a 15% GST.

Housing is ridiculously overpriced/undersupplied in oz. Disincentives such duty, tax, $100k + per block local government fees do nothing for housing affordability or availability.


But then you'd just have more GST on the construction cost of new houses.

JGK


Number of posts : 41790
Reputation : 161
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : jnt

Back to top Go down

Aus Federal Politics thread (III) - Page 39 Empty Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)

Post by skully Thu 06 Oct 2011, 09:37

So JGK, when are you gonna stand as the pinko candidate in Warringah? You seem to think you have the solutions to all our and your woes. Twisted Evil
skully
skully


Number of posts : 105985
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Aus Federal Politics thread (III) - Page 39 Empty Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)

Post by Mick Sawyer Thu 06 Oct 2011, 10:18

JGK wrote:
Mick Sawyer wrote:
JGK wrote:Stamp Duty on real property should still remain or at least be converted to an ongoing land tax (even on family homes).



Not with a 15% GST.

Housing is ridiculously overpriced/undersupplied in oz. Disincentives such duty, tax, $100k + per block local government fees do nothing for housing affordability or availability.


But then you'd just have more GST on the construction cost of new houses.

Yeah you would, but more than offset by the savings of $130k+ on council fees & duty.
Mick Sawyer
Mick Sawyer


Number of posts : 7267
Reputation : 21
Registration date : 2007-09-11
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Aus Federal Politics thread (III) - Page 39 Empty Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)

Post by G.Wood Thu 06 Oct 2011, 11:25

oi thunderqunt those council fees help pay for my tissues and socks
G.Wood
G.Wood


Number of posts : 12070
Reputation : 99
Registration date : 2007-09-06
Flag/Background : none

Back to top Go down

Aus Federal Politics thread (III) - Page 39 Empty Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)

Post by JGK Thu 06 Oct 2011, 14:24

skully wrote:So JGK, when are you gonna stand as the pinko candidate in Warringah? You seem to think you have the solutions to all our and your woes. Twisted Evil


Half my electorate support the Manly-Warringah Rugby League team so clearly those qunts don't deserve a candidate like me.


Last edited by JGK on Thu 06 Oct 2011, 14:26; edited 1 time in total

JGK


Number of posts : 41790
Reputation : 161
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : jnt

Back to top Go down

Aus Federal Politics thread (III) - Page 39 Empty Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)

Post by JGK Thu 06 Oct 2011, 14:25

Mick Sawyer wrote:
JGK wrote:
Mick Sawyer wrote:
JGK wrote:Stamp Duty on real property should still remain or at least be converted to an ongoing land tax (even on family homes).



Not with a 15% GST.

Housing is ridiculously overpriced/undersupplied in oz. Disincentives such duty, tax, $100k + per block local government fees do nothing for housing affordability or availability.


But then you'd just have more GST on the construction cost of new houses.

Yeah you would, but more than offset by the savings of $130k+ on council fees & duty.



FMD, that's one expensive house.

JGK


Number of posts : 41790
Reputation : 161
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : jnt

Back to top Go down

Aus Federal Politics thread (III) - Page 39 Empty Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)

Post by horace Thu 06 Oct 2011, 22:08

phurt...Australians overinvest in housing ...how about an imputed rent tax on home ownership and knock off neg gearing?...money could be diverted from over investment in housing into more productive areas. ... Australians seem to think that every new house requires his and hers home theatres along with umpteen bathrooms
horace
horace


Number of posts : 42573
Age : 114
Reputation : 90
Registration date : 2007-09-06
Flag/Background : ire

Back to top Go down

Aus Federal Politics thread (III) - Page 39 Empty Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)

Post by Mick Sawyer Thu 06 Oct 2011, 23:22

FMD, that's one expensive house.

I'm talking about the fees payable on land as it is developed, money that finds its way into Woody's local K Mart.


Last edited by Mick Sawyer on Thu 06 Oct 2011, 23:28; edited 1 time in total
Mick Sawyer
Mick Sawyer


Number of posts : 7267
Reputation : 21
Registration date : 2007-09-11
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Aus Federal Politics thread (III) - Page 39 Empty Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)

Post by Mick Sawyer Thu 06 Oct 2011, 23:26

horace wrote:phurt...Australians overinvest in housing ...

So why is there an undersupply?

horace wrote:.............knock off the neg gearingment in housing into more productive areas....

We tried that ........... it lasted about 10 minutes. Guess which sector of the community was hurt the most?
Mick Sawyer
Mick Sawyer


Number of posts : 7267
Reputation : 21
Registration date : 2007-09-11
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Aus Federal Politics thread (III) - Page 39 Empty Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)

Post by horace Thu 06 Oct 2011, 23:30

restrict neg gearing to new builds...
horace
horace


Number of posts : 42573
Age : 114
Reputation : 90
Registration date : 2007-09-06
Flag/Background : ire

Back to top Go down

Aus Federal Politics thread (III) - Page 39 Empty Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)

Post by Mick Sawyer Thu 06 Oct 2011, 23:38

horace wrote:restrict neg gearing to new builds...

There are always knock on effects horrie. What happens to the established dwelling market? Would that be beneficial?
Mick Sawyer
Mick Sawyer


Number of posts : 7267
Reputation : 21
Registration date : 2007-09-11
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Aus Federal Politics thread (III) - Page 39 Empty Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)

Post by skully Fri 07 Oct 2011, 00:36

Crikey, we are roaring toward AFPt v4.0 very quickly. Whoda thunk? Shocked Twisted Evil
skully
skully


Number of posts : 105985
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Aus Federal Politics thread (III) - Page 39 Empty Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)

Post by horace Fri 07 Oct 2011, 01:08

shaddap S....give us your thoughts on neg gearing

Mick - yes there is a knock on effect...might be that housing market goes through a necessary long term correction
horace
horace


Number of posts : 42573
Age : 114
Reputation : 90
Registration date : 2007-09-06
Flag/Background : ire

Back to top Go down

Aus Federal Politics thread (III) - Page 39 Empty Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)

Post by Mick Sawyer Fri 07 Oct 2011, 01:18

horace wrote:shaddap S....give us your thoughts on neg gearing

Mick - yes there is a knock on effect...might be that housing market goes through a necessary long term correction

I agree with the need for a sustainable correction but abolishing neg gearing won't achieve that whereas lowering the price of new land will find its way through the whole market.
Mick Sawyer
Mick Sawyer


Number of posts : 7267
Reputation : 21
Registration date : 2007-09-11
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Aus Federal Politics thread (III) - Page 39 Empty Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)

Post by Mick Sawyer Fri 07 Oct 2011, 01:20

G.Wood wrote:oi thunderqunt those council fees help pay for my tissues and socks



phurt. The additional GST revenue will be plenty enough to keep you in socks, the occasional fresh DVD and protein supplements.
Mick Sawyer
Mick Sawyer


Number of posts : 7267
Reputation : 21
Registration date : 2007-09-11
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Aus Federal Politics thread (III) - Page 39 Empty Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)

Post by skully Fri 07 Oct 2011, 01:32

horace wrote:shaddap S....give us your thoughts on neg gearing
It's grouse, thanks, h. I have two investment properties and they are going very nicely thanks. Cool
skully
skully


Number of posts : 105985
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Aus Federal Politics thread (III) - Page 39 Empty Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)

Post by JGK Fri 07 Oct 2011, 01:50

There is no problem with negative gearing per se. The problem is the ATO allowing investors to claim a CGT discount on the eventual sale of the property when the law is probably on their side to no allow this.

If investors paid full tax on their gains then it would be a fair system.

JGK


Number of posts : 41790
Reputation : 161
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : jnt

Back to top Go down

Aus Federal Politics thread (III) - Page 39 Empty Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)

Post by embee Fri 07 Oct 2011, 02:53

a fair system would be for investors to pay their average rate of tax on cap gains over the period of the gain
embee
embee


Number of posts : 26217
Age : 57
Reputation : 263
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background : aus

Back to top Go down

Aus Federal Politics thread (III) - Page 39 Empty Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)

Post by Mick Sawyer Fri 07 Oct 2011, 03:00

embee wrote:a fair system would be for investors to pay their average rate of tax on cap gains over the period of the gain


You mean: invest: zero marginal rate, zero marginal rate, zero marginal rate, zero marginal rate, sell: capital gain with zero average rate?
Mick Sawyer
Mick Sawyer


Number of posts : 7267
Reputation : 21
Registration date : 2007-09-11
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Aus Federal Politics thread (III) - Page 39 Empty Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)

Post by embee Fri 07 Oct 2011, 03:21

Thats the worst case scenario if you want to live off your investments

If you can arrange your tax arrangements that way then good luck to you

embee
embee


Number of posts : 26217
Age : 57
Reputation : 263
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background : aus

Back to top Go down

Aus Federal Politics thread (III) - Page 39 Empty Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)

Post by JGK Fri 07 Oct 2011, 03:28

Doesn't really sound very fair then.

In any case, if you were "living off your investments" then you probably wouldn't qualify for captial gains treatment anyway.

JGK


Number of posts : 41790
Reputation : 161
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : jnt

Back to top Go down

Aus Federal Politics thread (III) - Page 39 Empty Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)

Post by Zat Sun 09 Oct 2011, 22:17

Back to the pokies legislation, and - shock, horror - it seems the clubs industry has been telling porkies about how the world will end if people who wish to pplay the pokies have to set a limit before they play...

http://www.smh.com.au/national/clubs-have-less-to-lose-on-pokies-betting-trial-20111009-1lfwf.html


LICENSED clubs have offered public support for a trial of compulsory betting controls for poker machines after fresh evidence emerged suggesting the clubs have exaggerated likely financial losses caused by the proposed measures.

[snip]

The Clubs Australia move follows the disclosure of an industry estimate that the drop in gaming revenues from the measures would be 10-20 per cent, half the figures publicly cited by Clubs Australia.

I'm pretty sure that in the lead-up to random breath testing being introduced, there were calls from pub and club owners saying it would be the end of the world, and nobody would go out if RBT was brought in.

Ironic this stuff coming out just a few days after this ad appeared on TV...

Zat


Number of posts : 28872
Reputation : 86
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Aus Federal Politics thread (III) - Page 39 Empty Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 39 of 40 Previous  1 ... 21 ... 38, 39, 40  Next

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum