Re: Is Chuck over the hill?

by DJ_Smerk Thu 03 Dec 2009, 08:23

Chuck is all out of luck, India are running riot.

by taipan Thu 03 Dec 2009, 08:25

skully wrote:
embee wrote:Say Hello to Zat , Skully

Also confused me

by DJ_Smerk Thu 03 Dec 2009, 08:27

taipan wrote:
skully wrote:
embee wrote:Say Hello to Zat , Skully

Also confused me

Even Confucius is confused.

by skully Thu 03 Dec 2009, 08:27

I even waved the cursor over it to see if it was linky. shrug

by taipan Thu 03 Dec 2009, 08:27

So did I

by skully Thu 03 Dec 2009, 08:34

The witty wozzie may explain later. columbo

by skully Thu 03 Dec 2009, 08:53

11-0-74-0

by embee Thu 03 Dec 2009, 08:54

Well you weren't on Planet Earth so I assumed you must have been on Zog

by skully Thu 03 Dec 2009, 08:57

embee wrote:Well you weren't on Planet Earth so I assumed you must have been on Zog

I see.

Oops.

by Bradman Thu 03 Dec 2009, 09:25

Chuck isn't over the hill. He'll be able to 'project' those balls to a batsman whilst he's in a wheelchair.

by Henry Thu 03 Dec 2009, 10:28

Murali is gone. He's lost his fizz in the same way that Kumble did in his last few tests.

by Bradman Thu 03 Dec 2009, 10:31

Murali is a qunt.

by DJ_Smerk Thu 03 Dec 2009, 10:33

Who will the critics pick on when Murali stands down?

by Bradman Thu 03 Dec 2009, 10:34

DJ_Smerk wrote:Who will the critics pick on when Murali stands down?

Murali

by DJ_Smerk Thu 03 Dec 2009, 10:40

Bradman wrote:
DJ_Smerk wrote:Who will the critics pick on when Murali stands down?

Murali

by skully Thu 03 Dec 2009, 10:44

16-0-100-0. Jebus, not such harsh treatment for Chuck since Roy smeared him all over the SCG in a JAMODI (10-0-99-0) in Feb 2006.

Well played, Seaweed.

by SG Thu 03 Dec 2009, 10:48

Henry wrote:Murali is gone. He's lost his fizz in the same way that Kumble did in his last few years.

Corrected.

by Bradman Thu 03 Dec 2009, 10:49

skully wrote:16-0-100-0. Jebus, not such harsh treatment for Chuck since Roy smeared him all over the SCG in a JAMODI (10-0-99-0) in Feb 2006.

Well played, Seaweed.

I'm surprised no-one picked it up earlier. If he attempts to bowl it is illegal.

by skully Thu 03 Dec 2009, 11:24

19-0-118-0

by lardbucket Thu 03 Dec 2009, 11:24

M Muralitharan 3* 4 119.5 10 514 5 3/97 3/221 102.80 4.28

by Bradman Thu 03 Dec 2009, 11:37

Those figures look like a code Dan Brown would come up with. Though even the worst fiction couldn't come up with a scenario where Chuck's allowed to chuck.

by lardbucket Thu 03 Dec 2009, 11:38

I like the 'best match figures' in particular.

by skully Thu 03 Dec 2009, 11:42

Pity it's taken 13 or so years for justice to prevail.

by Bradman Thu 03 Dec 2009, 11:45

Is that a record?

by taipan Thu 03 Dec 2009, 11:47

Garth McKenzie. 69/70?

by Sponsored content