Is Vikas the new Karti ?

CT wrote:it's a total hoot when you have vicki and his sidekick bucky beaver sooking buckets of tears over how everyone else is racists and hates them when they sprout their diatribe of spite hate and racial abuse.

oh how can you not challenge them such sport

DJ_Smerk wrote:The things that stood out for me were, sexual bumjiggery and rode cowgirl.

Batman wrote:

CT wrote:it's a total hoot when you have vicki and his sidekick bucky beaver sooking buckets of tears over how everyone else is racists and hates them when they sprout their diatribe of spite hate and racial abuse.

oh how can you not challenge them such sport

Coming from skully's sidekick who has done little of note save play taipworm's replacement for him? How impressive! Just to clear this up one more time - I don't label everyone racists though I may have reported your loverboy for being an absolute one. I have a right to challenge anyone who thinks I would be racist if I favored diplomatic sanctions against Pakistan for sponsoring terrorism in my country because that is a diplomatic issue post Mumbai attacks. There is absolutely nothing wrong in desiring no relations with a nation hellbent on wrecking my country apart and killing our citizens for no fault of theirs. Entirely different issues and viewpoints. Now fark off. Come back and talk to me when your menstrual period is over.....

Jontyh wrote:There are others with odd views, but nobody else rants endlessly and ludicrously like you [Vikas] do, or invariably fails to grasp the point.

JKLever wrote:Did Batman always go mentalist like this? Thought he was always a fairly moderate amiable kind of forummer.

Clearly the Aussie forummers baiting him has sent him crazy.

Zat wrote:

Jontyh wrote:There are others with odd views, but nobody else rants endlessly and ludicrously like you [Vikas] do, or invariably fails to grasp the point.

What about Bucky?

buckSH wrote:6' 4" 120 kgs, and here's a picture...

Jontyh wrote:

Batman wrote:

CT wrote:it's a total hoot when you have vicki and his sidekick bucky beaver sooking buckets of tears over how everyone else is racists and hates them when they sprout their diatribe of spite hate and racial abuse.

oh how can you not challenge them such sport

Coming from skully's sidekick who has done little of note save play taipworm's replacement for him? How impressive! Just to clear this up one more time - I don't label everyone racists though I may have reported your loverboy for being an absolute one. I have a right to challenge anyone who thinks I would be racist if I favored diplomatic sanctions against Pakistan for sponsoring terrorism in my country because that is a diplomatic issue post Mumbai attacks. There is absolutely nothing wrong in desiring no relations with a nation hellbent on wrecking my country apart and killing our citizens for no fault of theirs. Entirely different issues and viewpoints. Now fark off. Come back and talk to me when your menstrual period is over.....

Ffs, Batty. I'm sure nobody in her or his right mind would dispute your right to be outraged by terrorism - or any other atrocity for that matter. How many of us come from a country which hasn't been afflicted by some kind of horror? But do you have to bang on about it every single day, and associate such events with trivial piss-takes that are based on gentle stereotypes? I mean, someone makes a joke about Indians all working in call centres and you'll launch into an anti-western tirade that suggests we're all ambivalent to any suffering outside of our own shores. It's just f*cking tiresome, mate.

Jontyh wrote:

Zat wrote:

Jontyh wrote:There are others with odd views, but nobody else rants endlessly and ludicrously like you [Vikas] do, or invariably fails to grasp the point.

What about Bucky?

Eh? They're not the same person?
My bad..

DJ_Smerk wrote:Jonty implying that my views on James Harris and Robert Croft are "weird".

Zat wrote:

JKLever wrote:Did Batman always go mentalist like this? Thought he was always a fairly moderate amiable kind of forummer.

Clearly the Aussie forummers baiting him has sent him crazy.

He's been crazy for ages. But his most recent tete-a-tete with skully seems to have sent him over the edge.

Batman wrote:

Jontyh wrote:

Batman wrote:

CT wrote:it's a total hoot when you have vicki and his sidekick bucky beaver sooking buckets of tears over how everyone else is racists and hates them when they sprout their diatribe of spite hate and racial abuse.

oh how can you not challenge them such sport

Coming from skully's sidekick who has done little of note save play taipworm's replacement for him? How impressive! Just to clear this up one more time - I don't label everyone racists though I may have reported your loverboy for being an absolute one. I have a right to challenge anyone who thinks I would be racist if I favored diplomatic sanctions against Pakistan for sponsoring terrorism in my country because that is a diplomatic issue post Mumbai attacks. There is absolutely nothing wrong in desiring no relations with a nation hellbent on wrecking my country apart and killing our citizens for no fault of theirs. Entirely different issues and viewpoints. Now fark off. Come back and talk to me when your menstrual period is over.....

Ffs, Batty. I'm sure nobody in her or his right mind would dispute your right to be outraged by terrorism - or any other atrocity for that matter. How many of us come from a country which hasn't been afflicted by some kind of horror? But do you have to bang on about it every single day, and associate such events with trivial piss-takes that are based on gentle stereotypes? I mean, someone makes a joke about Indians all working in call centres and you'll launch into an anti-western tirade that suggests we're all ambivalent to any suffering outside of our own shores. It's just f*cking tiresome, mate.

Sometimes it happens in a debate when people keep asking the same questions over and over again. The Pakistan debate was stretched by many people who sought to keep raking it up. It would not have happened if Faisal didn't start multiple threads over it to slam us over IPL and then dragging racism in it. I am sure something like Indians working in call centers stops being a joke once it has been adequately conveyed that it is unacceptable at some point. Got nothing more to add to it.

Batman wrote:I am not crazy, but absolutely insane and extremely nationalist.

Zat wrote:

Batman wrote:I am not crazy, but absolutely insane and extremely nationalist.

You should be put up against a wall and shot then. There's nothing wrong with being patriotic, but anyone who goes on about being nationalist as a good thing is f*cked in the head. It's arseholes with that frame of mind who spark trouble.

Jontyh wrote:Also, why is the call centre thing unacceptable? The Aussies don't get in a tiz about being called convicts or crude; we don't get upset about being laughed at for our infrequent ablutions; Smerky can deal with his penchant for sheep, so why are you any different?

Batman wrote:

Zat wrote:

Batman wrote:I am not crazy, but absolutely insane and extremely nationalist.

You should be put up against a wall and shot then. There's nothing wrong with being patriotic, but anyone who goes on about being nationalist as a good thing is f*cked in the head. It's arseholes with that frame of mind who spark trouble.

Nothing wrong in being nationalist if the heart bleeds for the country and as long as you aren't leading the wrong revolutions......

Zat wrote:

Jontyh wrote:Also, why is the call centre thing unacceptable? The Aussies don't get in a tiz about being called convicts or crude; we don't get upset about being laughed at for our infrequent ablutions; Smerky can deal with his penchant for sheep, so why are you any different?

I'm not a big fan of the 'convict' thing. As for crude... f*ck you!

The call centre thing seems to be symptomatic of a wider malaise, a systematic paranoia if you like. As is the need to respond with the 'we were under the yoke of the colonialists for years so now we can be as rude to them and anyone else as we like'. It's on a par with the stupid quntish behaviour of the people who obstruct peace in the middle east on the grounds that one tribe of people did something to another tribe of people thousands of years ago. It's stupid and incredibly boorish.

DJ_Smerk wrote:It's like when Vilks and Shoey said they'd like to have a nice debate with Bucks.

DJ_Smerk wrote:I don't know when people started using this "I always thought so and so was well balanced" BS.


That if anything is becoming a frustratingly cliché response to acknowledge a poster's idiocy without sound nasty.

.

G.Wood wrote:

DJ_Smerk wrote:I don't know when people started using this "I always thought so and so was well balanced" BS.


That if anything is becoming a frustratingly cliché response to acknowledge a poster's idiocy without sound nasty.

.

I guess it is fortunate that nobody ever thought you were well balanced