Michael Clarke backs cheat in Phillip Hughes row

It seemed to be Clarke's wild celebrations which influenced Hughes.

Botham has long crusade against this kind of stuff. He had a go at some Paki keeper on the field once IIRC. Of course Bell's blatant cheating on the edge, which he knew he'd hit didn't rate a mention. Beefy is a qunt.

Some cheating isn't cheating though, Zat. It's ok to cheat and stay at the wicket even though you know full well you've knocked the cover off the ball, as long as the umps don't give it.
However, an Aussie or Pakster claiming a catch that wasn't is the worst kind of blatant cheating quntism in the history of cheating quntisms.

Ah, I see, there are different depths of quntness.

skully will probably start a thread on that now.

I must admit, I did call out "cheat" quite a few times today when Prior appealed for some dubious leg side catches.

If a man can't tell his arse from his elbow, he's hardly likely to know if he's caught a ball is he?