Month of Meh

taipan wrote:

horace wrote:do not believe I said it was

I did say however that you bought it on yourself...given you are not as thick as batty you might consider not goading him in future

I sort of think you said it was justified. But as you are are in a minority of one, your opinion is, as always, irrelevant.

I think Batty has learnt his lesson.

I am hoping you have learnt your lesson of not getting too personal with people if you don't like them getting personal back at you. Rules of engagement can't be dictated by one side ever and there are no rules in fighting dirty if someone keeps commenting on me personally drerogatorily again and again merely for some cheap thrills. My rules are very simple, if someone is hell bent on hitting me below the belt I will kick back much harder where it hurts and I need no one's endorsement on this forum in fighting my battles. AFAIAC, both the means and the end are justified in a war. I hope you will remember what it is like to have your personal space violated before you go about violating people's personal space for personal entertainment again in the future.

Look you two, can't you just throw a couple of nukes at each other and be done with it? Please?

good grief batty....quit while you're ahead...or even....your behaviour was less than respectful

horace wrote:your behaviour was less than respectful

Batman wrote:

taipan wrote:

horace wrote:do not believe I said it was

I did say however that you bought it on yourself...given you are not as thick as batty you might consider not goading him in future

I sort of think you said it was justified. But as you are are in a minority of one, your opinion is, as always, irrelevant.

I think Batty has learnt his lesson.

I am hoping you have learnt your lesson of not getting too personal with people if you don't like them getting personal back at you. Rules of engagement can't be dictated by one side ever and there are no rules in fighting dirty if someone keeps commenting on me personally drerogatorily again and again merely for some cheap thrills. My rules are very simple, if someone is hell bent on hitting me below the belt I will kick back much harder where it hurts and I need no one's endorsement on this forum in fighting my battles. AFAIAC, both the means and the end are justified in a war. I hope you will remember what it is like to have your personal space violated before you go about violating people's personal space for personal entertainment again in the future.

Are you still to thick to realise that you made a total qunt of yourself?

FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT!
FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT!
FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT!

taipan wrote:

Batman wrote:

taipan wrote:

horace wrote:do not believe I said it was

I did say however that you bought it on yourself...given you are not as thick as batty you might consider not goading him in future

I sort of think you said it was justified. But as you are are in a minority of one, your opinion is, as always, irrelevant.

I think Batty has learnt his lesson.

I am hoping you have learnt your lesson of not getting too personal with people if you don't like them getting personal back at you. Rules of engagement can't be dictated by one side ever and there are no rules in fighting dirty if someone keeps commenting on me personally drerogatorily again and again merely for some cheap thrills. My rules are very simple, if someone is hell bent on hitting me below the belt I will kick back much harder where it hurts and I need no one's endorsement on this forum in fighting my battles. AFAIAC, both the means and the end are justified in a war. I hope you will remember what it is like to have your personal space violated before you go about violating people's personal space for personal entertainment again in the future.

Are you still to thick to realise that you made a total qunt of yourself?

I will leave you to ponder over the fact that people living in glass houses should not throw stones at others homes.

Batman wrote:I will leave you to ponder over the fact that people living in glass houses should not throw stones at others homes.

Just throw stones at each other, come on, get on with it already...

Zat wrote:

Batman wrote:I will leave you to ponder over the fact that people living in glass houses should not throw stones at others homes.

Just throw stones at each other, come on, get on with it already...

I am afraid there won't be a fight for you as you have not paid the annual subscription fees yet. What do you take us for? A free to air entertainment channel?

That's soft, Batty. Don't hold back.

Zat wrote:That's soft, Batty. Don't hold back.

It's the age of DTH sonny.......
I hear you have me subscribed and bookmarked btw.......

Don't flatter yourself.

So Vikas just won't let it go?

Well it wasn't helped by Horrie reopening it on this thread after he got his ass kicked on the original thread.

nor taips it would seem

horace wrote:nor taips it would seem

FSS Horrie, you dragged it here in the first place.

taipan and horrie....

from my younger days

Batman wrote:

taipan wrote:

horace wrote:do not believe I said it was

I did say however that you bought it on yourself...given you are not as thick as batty you might consider not goading him in future

I sort of think you said it was justified. But as you are are in a minority of one, your opinion is, as always, irrelevant.

I think Batty has learnt his lesson.

I am hoping you have learnt your lesson of not getting too personal with people if you don't like them getting personal back at you. Rules of engagement can't be dictated by one side ever and there are no rules in fighting dirty if someone keeps commenting on me personally drerogatorily again and again merely for some cheap thrills. My rules are very simple, if someone is hell bent on hitting me below the belt I will kick back much harder where it hurts and I need no one's endorsement on this forum in fighting my battles. AFAIAC, both the means and the end are justified in a war. I hope you will remember what it is like to have your personal space violated before you go about violating people's personal space for personal entertainment again in the future.

Genocide? Torture? Rape?

I still don't see how it was a like-for-like response. Where and when did taips violate your "personal space" (whatever that is, across telephone wires and cables)?

It's just a question. Please don't suicide-bomb a school in response, no matter how "justified" it might seem to a fruitcake.

Why slander fruitcake? Mmmmm.... fruitcake....

Aye TBH I see both of them gayly tagging on to people's comments about the other one, it's a reciprocal thing but Vikas acts like it's a one-way villification. It's not. He must be f*cked in the brains to think it was justified. Bordering on spastic.

Cyber-stalking isn't usually associated with those of a healthy mental state.

Dello wrote:Cyber-stalking isn't usually associated with those of a healthy mental state.

That's it. Just imagine having some picture of someone for x amount of years and keeping it as some possible later form of vengeance. Twisted.

Brass Monkey wrote:Aye TBH I see both of them gayly tagging on to people's comments about the other one, it's a reciprocal thing but Vikas acts like it's a one-way villification. It's not. He must be f*cked in the brains to think it was justified. Bordering on spastic.

Dan if merely pointing out that everyone bar Horrie thinks he acted like a qunt is gay, so be it.

It said at the time I would let the forum judge him on his actions. They have, the tribe has spoken.