Re: The reported threads.

[skully]

Geez, tac really is an easily offended old queen, isn't he.

Classic case of someone who can dish it out, but can't take it when it's given back to him. Otherwise known as an 'Aussie',

What?

[Henry]

Oh come on! Who when what where?

Tac, a year or so ago, some argument he wasn't winning, this forum.

[doremi]

No, not tac. The cricketer's mom incident.

[skully]

Gee Trev, you seem extra bitter tonight. Alcohol-assisted?

[skully]

No, not tac. The cricketer's mom incident.

Trev slagged off an English cricketer in here and the cricketer's Mum somehow found out (Google, most likely) and apparently made 4 reports to the Mods to have the offending post[s] dealt with, or something like that.

[skully]

I assume you have to be a Member to report a post? Hey Dello, what is the Mum's handle?

Just kidding. Don't wanna draw attention to ourselves.

[Henry]

No, JKL made a joke about the young cricketer's appearance, Dello informed us a few months later the cricketer's Mum had picked it up on Google alerts and complained, and I then made a few stupid, provocative jokes using the young cricketer's name, which didn't go down too well with Dello.

[skully]

Ah, sorry Trev. JKL was the offending slagger, but you milked it.

[doremi]

FFS, how did I miss that...

Any hints as to who the cricketer is?

And I think a county cricketer also posted on C4 once. Chased away by bliksem IIRC. Chris Murtagh most probably, though I'm not sure.

[Henry]

Ben St Oakes.

[Henry]

FFS, how did I miss that...

Any hints as to who the cricketer is?

And I think a county cricketer also posted on C4 once. Chased away by bliksem IIRC. Chris Murtagh most probably, though I'm not sure.

Pete Trego posted on C4 for a couple of months around (I think) 2002.

[Bradman]

Well if he wasn't English I'd say Mitch.

Actually whilst we're on long lost forumers, whatever happened to Warnie's Mum?

[skully]

County Cricketer was around on C4 when I was there from early 2005 on.

[Brass Monkey]

Neil Fairbrother - 'Harvey' - around 2003

[Henry]

I can't actually remember if i've reported anyone. I probably have At a guess i'd say it was Zim or tac for being c*nts.

[skully]

So you're admitting that you THINK you are a weak qunt?

[Henry]

I can just remember reporting someone a few years ago. It was for something more than getting stick, or even abuse. Was something that was just wrong. Can't remember what, though. Not vague at all........

[Bradman]

Wow! Just checked out how to report someone

Form
Items marked with a * are required.

Abuse type* :

Sexual and/or pornographic content
Violent or repulsive content
Hateful or abusive content
Defamatory content and / or affecting the integrity of a person
Harmful and dangerous acts
Drugs and any other illicit substance
Sale or exchange of medication that requires a prescription from a licensed practitioner, or medicines without prescription
Copyright infringment
Spam
Phishing and/ or malware website
Credit card fraud
Hacking
This website violates in any other way the terms of service.Confirmation code* :Comments : I swear that all specified informations are correct*
Glossary
The Glossary

.

I think the only thing on this list that isn't done on a daily basis is "credit card fraud"/

[Zat]

Dude, don't make me laugh now at your childish and hypocritical show mongering. Lay off and do what you do best. Like telling off the forum owner how he should run the show in the middle of an emotional flounce or reporting people for threatening you when you merely couldn't get the sarcasm in their posts.

This from the form dram queen who has reported more than any sane human being ever would. F*ck, you really are as thick as you behave on here, it isn't an act, you're genuinely as thick as pig sh!t. I know it's not nice to pick on the stupid kid, but you reall leave no other choice. Anyway, back to your dribble...

Or screwing your pet dingos and posting animal porn all over the place while stalking people you don't like. Thats all so mature. Don't push yourself too much mate. I fear you may suffer breakdown and start posting crap and animal porn all over again.

Animal porn? the little cartoon thing I used to post at Bucky? Were you jealous? Or were you the dog he was rooting at the time, so you didn't like being called a dog? And me suffer a breakdown? This from the bloke whose sole purpose in his life every time he checks out of the rubber room is to come back here and hunt me down? You sad, strange, deluded, little man...

Just take a deep breathe, count to 10 and let it go. Seriously.

Take your own advice. You're the one with the problem. A massive psychological problem. One that needs medication at a guess.

Oh, and by the way, don't report me like you did skully several times. Or has your M.O. Changed? Will you run to the big cheese and have a cry?

[LeFromage]

Wow! Just checked out how to report someone

Form
Items marked with a * are required.

Abuse type* :

Sexual and/or pornographic content
Violent or repulsive content
Hateful or abusive content
Defamatory content and / or affecting the integrity of a person
Harmful and dangerous acts
Drugs and any other illicit substance
Sale or exchange of medication that requires a prescription from a licensed practitioner, or medicines without prescription
Copyright infringment
Spam
Phishing and/ or malware website
Credit card fraud
Hacking
This website violates in any other way the terms of service.Confirmation code* :Comments : I swear that all specified informations are correct*
Glossary
The Glossary

.

I think the only thing on this list that isn't done on a daily basis is "credit card fraud"/

Pfft. We only skirt around the edges of 3 and 4.

Although when vilks posted that picture of himself, we were dangerously close to "repulsive content".

[Zat]

When Batty posted his comedy video, I reckon at least five were breached.

[skully]

4?

Defamatory? Doesn't one have to have fame before one can be defamed?

And as for 3, I prefer to consider allegedly hateful and abusive content as playful banter. If any disagree, let 'em flounce off in disgust.

[LeFromage]

4?

Defamatory? Doesn't one have to have fame before one can be defamed?

And as for 3, I prefer to consider allegedly hateful and abusive content as playful banter. If any disagree, let 'em flounce off in disgust.

Are not famous cricketers the overwhelming subject of this forum?

[Zat]

Jay, you still can't let go of that dream that this is a cricket forum, can you?

[skully]

So calling a useless cricketer a shire-horse is OK on national telly but not kosher on a cricket forum?

I accept your point if a cricketer's Mum complains, however.

[Sponsored content]