Lets put this all behind

May be we should all move on from this disgraceful episode.

Bhajji may not have been proven guilty but my gut feeling is he did say something that was really bad, especially the way he went all defensive on the tape.

But, it was Symonds who started it.

There were mistakes made by everyone. Indians not controlling Bhajji and Aussies in not controlling Symonds.

Lets just put the whole thing behind.

prasad14 wrote:But, it was Symonds who started it.

Oh look who's here.

Invader Zim wrote:

prasad14 wrote:But, it was Symonds who started it.

snigger

I am not making excuses for Bhajji's actions.

I am saying Bhajji is guilty and so is Symonds to lesser extent for provoking Bhajji.

Meh..seems like u lot do want to drag with crap.

prasad14 wrote:I am not making excuses for Bhajji's actions.

I am saying Bhajji is guilty and so is Symonds to lesser extent for provoking Bhajji.

Meh..seems like u lot do want to drag with crap.

No mate, I don't want the crap to drag on. What I found drop dead funny was that you had to hurl on last piece of it before suggesting that we all get on with it.

prasad14 wrote:I am not making excuses for Bhajji's actions.

Invader Zim wrote:

prasad14 wrote:I am not making excuses for Bhajji's actions.

Has anyone suggested it was merely a backhanded compliment yet?

I am not hurling last piece of it mate. I am stating my point of view.

I feel Symonds has to take some responsibility for instigating this thing.

I know a lot of people don't like bhajji's and Sree's behavior, and rightly so, because they can behave like idiots at times.

And it is the same way with us Indians and Symonds. This guy has been making crap comments ever since we won 20-20 world cup.

Its like just like Mcgrath and Sarwan incident. What Sarvan said was below the belt but he wouldn't have said it had Mcgrath not started it. That does mean what Sarvan said was ok either.

If you say Symonds is completely innocent in this issue, I will disagree on it.

We can disagree abt this but we can also put this behind us.

Invader Zim wrote:

prasad14 wrote:I am not making excuses for Bhajji's actions.

Do that..

And please tell us how it felt to shoor u'rself.

It has moved beyond Harbhajan/Symonds.

What is p!ssing me off is the manipulation of the system by certain international cricket boards.

"I feel Symonds has to take some responsibility for instigating this thing."

Indeed, none of it would have happened if he wasn't black

taipan wrote:It has moved beyond Harbhajan/Symonds.

What is p!ssing me off is the manipulation of the system by certain international cricket boards.

Was the trial unfair ?? Do you have a problem with the trial ?

If not then WTF is your problem ?

*Buckaroo* wrote:

taipan wrote:It has moved beyond Harbhajan/Symonds.

What is p!ssing me off is the manipulation of the system by certain international cricket boards.

Was the trial unfair ?? Do you have a problem with the trial ?

If not then WTF is your problem ?

Buckaroo in sucessful attempt to prove he is as thick as a plank.

Fark, I'd be one of those 250 million US millionaires that Kenny farkin Sutcliffe was talking about, if I had a dollar for every post on this forum relating to the "monkey" incident.

taipan wrote:

*Buckaroo* wrote:

taipan wrote:It has moved beyond Harbhajan/Symonds.

What is p!ssing me off is the manipulation of the system by certain international cricket boards.

Was the trial unfair ?? Do you have a problem with the trial ?

If not then WTF is your problem ?

Buckaroo in sucessful attempt to prove he is as thick as a plank.

You still didn't answer the question mate .. was there something wrong with the trial ?

Please answer my question.

"We can disagree abt this but we can also put this behind us."

Cool

If you are not up to speed with the machinations behind the trial, more fool you.

taipan wrote:If you are not up to speed with the machinations behind the trial, more fool you.

Did those machinations affect the trial ?? Are you saying that the trial is now unfair and a sham ?

What symonds did was "ok" under the code of conduct ....Harby's response wasn't ...

embee wrote:What symonds did was "ok" under the code of conduct ....Harby's response wasn't ...

Agreed.

And I feel ICC code of conduct must be revamped. What is not acceptable outside of a cricket field can not be acceptable inside. Be it racist remarks, abusive behavior or so called mental disintegration.

embee wrote:What symonds did was "ok" under the code of conduct ....Harby's response wasn't ...

and he got punished for it ffs!

The One wrote:

embee wrote:What symonds did was "ok" under the code of conduct ....Harby's response wasn't ...

and he got punished for it ffs!

Bwahahahaha, a fine that will no doubt be paid by Indian management to sooth the feelings of their poor persecuted Bhajji. I can't wait till he slips up again. Maybe to Chris Gayle.

skully wrote:

The One wrote:

embee wrote:What symonds did was "ok" under the code of conduct ....Harby's response wasn't ...

and he got punished for it ffs!

Bwahahahaha, a fine that will no doubt be paid by Indian management to sooth the feelings of their poor persecuted Bhajji. I can't wait till he slips up again. Maybe to Chris Gayle.

A bit like when Doug Hawkins got fined for abusing an umpire (over a really shit decision that cost Fitzroy a match) and the club supporters chipped in to pay his fine ....they raised about 10 times the fine and Doug said he was thinking about abusing the umpires every week if there was that much profit in it ....

Hehehe. Gold.