The world needs a good England side

At least, this forum does.

Australia need a good England side because their 'Poms are sh!t' insults are so true there isn't much of a wind-up possible.

India need a good England side so they can verbally masturbate about 2001, some sort of moral victory in 2004 for some sort of '2nd best' argument.

SA need a good England side so they can play the hard-done-by "Well, we'd probably be second in the world if we could field who we wanted to. Kevin Pietersen's South African don't you know."

Pakistan need a fit and firing Flintoff so they can mention Imran Khan again.... and again.

ATM, you're all looking a bit lost and dumbfounded, just like the English.

Bangladesh need a good England side to test themselves against . . .the current mob would be too easy.

tac wrote:Bangladesh need a good England side to test themselves against . . .the current mob would be too easy.

Literally wouldn't fancy us playing Bangladesh at their home ATM.

Brass Monkey wrote:

tac wrote:Bangladesh need a good England side to test themselves against . . .the current mob would be too easy.

Literally wouldn't fancy us playing Bangladesh at their home ATM.

Sad thing is, I think you're right, Danny. It could get ugly.

You know you're shit with a capital S when Chris Martin is mouthing off at you...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/england/7289560.stm

We deserve everything we get but fooking Kiwi's are getting worse than the Aussies. They can't stop fcucking talking about us to the press!

The world needs a good England side

We all want things we aren't going to get. SIUUBG.

tac wrote:
Sad thing is, I think you're right, Danny. It could get ugly.

Even sadder thing is, it probably wouldn't even be the trademark dobbers that did the damage... it would be the p1sspoor pacemen.

Er, why do we need England for a '2nd best' argument?

doremi wrote:Er, why do we need England for a '2nd best' argument?

Because SA are now clearly 2nd best all on their own.

doremi wrote:Er, why do we need England for a '2nd best' argument?

Because the post-colonial chippiness that many of you display adds some extra spice and vehemence into your sooky argument.

tac wrote:

doremi wrote:Er, why do we need England for a '2nd best' argument?

Because SA are now clearly 2nd best all on their own.

Aww come-on, it's not all that bad for Oz. I'd still put them in ahead of SA, at no. 2.

doremi wrote:

tac wrote:

doremi wrote:Er, why do we need England for a '2nd best' argument?

Because SA are now clearly 2nd best all on their own.

Aww come-on, it's not all that bad for Oz A. I'd still put them in ahead of SA at no. 2.

Yep, I'd agree with that.

JKLever wrote:You know you're shit with a capital S when Chris Martin is mouthing off at you...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/england/7289560.stm

We deserve everything we get but fooking Kiwi's are getting worse than the Aussies. They can't stop fcucking talking about us to the press!

Not at all. We were embarrassing pathetic, and I'd continue to play on it to win a test series!

Makes sense really!!!

JKLever wrote:We deserve everything we get but fooking Kiwi's are getting worse than the Aussies. They can't stop fcucking talking about us to the press!

Whereas the British press were gentlemanliness and dignified sportsmanship personified in 2005 . . .

freddled gruntbuggly wrote:

JKLever wrote:We deserve everything we get but fooking Kiwi's are getting worse than the Aussies. They can't stop fcucking talking about us to the press!

Whereas the British press were gentlemanliness and dignified sportsmanship personified in 2005 . . .

You don't grasp the difference between press and team do you tails?

Um, is this thread about football, rugby or cricket?

Tiddlywinks...

JKLever wrote:Tiddlywinks...

Our tiddlywink team got killed by the quota.

The world does not need a good English football side, they're happy enough supporting the present one.

JKLever wrote:

Typical pom.

When the going gets tough, the tough go home.

a good England side

I'd settle for ordinary ..

taipan wrote:

Typical pom.

When the going gets tough, the tough go home.

Typical Saffie, got a few IDs.

Brass Monkey wrote:

taipan wrote:

Typical pom.

When the going gets tough, the tough go home.

Typical Saffie, got a few IDs.

Whatever you want to believe Danny.

taipan wrote:

Whatever you want to believe Danny.

Typical Saffie, wants me to believe whatever I want.