Re: Aus v Eng, T20 WC, Cape Town, 14th September

by doctorspin Fri 14 Sep 2007, 14:32

Shoeshine wrote:I can't see Australia deliberately going for it inside 12. if they got off to a flyer, then maybe, but it's more important to them to just make sure they win.

You don't understand.....one over from Schoefield should do it.

If Jimmy was playing they'd get them in 8.

by doremi Fri 14 Sep 2007, 14:32

I like Slater the commentator and analyst. Funny and makes sense and not a bitter geezer like Chappelli.

by JKLever Fri 14 Sep 2007, 14:32

taipan wrote:
taipan wrote:
Batfink Begins wrote:
tac wrote:Well that's hardly my fault . . .give yourself an uppercut!

No, true. Though there's a tinge of hypocrisy with your tumbleweed thing

Thought Taips could've laid into you before her as well is all.

So it's all my fault?

Look it wasn't much of a go anyway. Personally I thought the whole thing was bleeding stupid from the beginning, but for Fluffy to also fall into what was obviously a wind up, was the funny part.

And JKL getting his knickers in a twist was pure bonus.

Meh....

I couldn't give a flying fark really

Seriously, it's just a farking forum. None of this matters.

I don't see her going out of her way to trash any of you, except when you poke her endlessly.

If you feel the need to have a pop at her for being 'fluffy', you need to take a good look at yourself frankly.

by Geoffrey Trueman Fri 14 Sep 2007, 14:32

SOS is the cry.

Save Our Souls? Nah, Shower Of S***e!

by Shoeshine Fri 14 Sep 2007, 14:32

Sky now reckon Australia need to win in 9 overs and 3 balls to knock England out. There's no way they'll go for that.

by beamer Fri 14 Sep 2007, 14:32

Well, they're now saying 9.3 instead of 12 overs. Surely that's too much, would need a higher run rate than SL's record effort this morning?

by tac Fri 14 Sep 2007, 14:33

JKLever wrote:
taipan wrote:
taipan wrote:
Batfink Begins wrote:
tac wrote:Well that's hardly my fault . . .give yourself an uppercut!

No, true. Though there's a tinge of hypocrisy with your tumbleweed thing

Thought Taips could've laid into you before her as well is all.

So it's all my fault?

Look it wasn't much of a go anyway. Personally I thought the whole thing was bleeding stupid from the beginning, but for Fluffy to also fall into what was obviously a wind up, was the funny part.

And JKL getting his knickers in a twist was pure bonus.

Meh....

I couldn't give a flying fark really

Seriously, it's just a farking forum. None of this matters.

I don't see her going out of her way to trash any of you, except when you poke her endlessly.

If you feel the need to have a pop at her for being 'fluffy', you need to take a good look at yourself frankly.

Nice post from someone who doesn't give a flying . . . Very Happy

by Brass Monkey Fri 14 Sep 2007, 14:33

skully wrote:
Johno - pleasantly surprised
Bung - passable
Sarfraz - good except for the no balls
Ferny - excellent death bowling
The rest - WGAF

To contain England to mid 130s is a fine effort. The Aus bowlers have done their job. Now can the batsman do the right thing?

And Chappelli is such a d!ck. Aussie arrogance is one thing, but being a deadset prat is another.

Spot on. All bowled impeccably, bar the noballs.

Spot on. Chappelli is a cnut and one I'd give a stiff back-hander to.

by JKLever Fri 14 Sep 2007, 14:34

Sky reckon Aus must get these inside 9.3 overs to knock us out.

Tall order to bowl that badly, even for us...

by tac Fri 14 Sep 2007, 14:34

Batfink Begins wrote:
skully wrote:
Johno - pleasantly surprised
Bung - passable
Sarfraz - good except for the no balls
Ferny - excellent death bowling
The rest - WGAF

To contain England to mid 130s is a fine effort. The Aus bowlers have done their job. Now can the batsman do the right thing?

And Chappelli is such a d!ck. Aussie arrogance is one thing, but being a deadset prat is another.

Spot on. All bowled impeccably, bar the noballs.

Spot on. Chappelli is a cnut and one I'd give a stiff back-hander to.

Seemed very controlled but for one over from Token . . . Pup did well it seems . . .

by JKLever Fri 14 Sep 2007, 14:34

tac wrote:

Nice post from someone who doesn't give a flying . . .

Knock yerself out taccy boy

by doctorspin Fri 14 Sep 2007, 14:35

Shoeshine wrote:Sky now reckon Australia need to win in 9 overs and 3 balls to knock England out. There's no way they'll go for that.

C.H.R.I.S. S.C.H.O.E.F.I.E.L.D.

by doremi Fri 14 Sep 2007, 14:35

It's almost started. Flintoff to bowl out I'd think during the frst 12.

by Brass Monkey Fri 14 Sep 2007, 14:35

doremi wrote:I like Slater the commentator and analyst. Funny and makes sense and not a bitter geezer like Chappelli.

Yeah, one of my favourite commentators.

by tac Fri 14 Sep 2007, 14:36

JKLever wrote:
tac wrote:

Nice post from someone who doesn't give a flying . . .

Knock yerself out taccy boy

Mate, I don't give a toss either . . . but I think this is a bit of a beat up over one comment from taips . . .

Again, my response to anything from fluffy is the tumbleweed from now on . . .

by JKLever Fri 14 Sep 2007, 14:36

doremi wrote:Allout in 20 overs. Not that good.

Its T20, hit or get out stuff Doremi

Havent you watched any 20/20 gubbins...

by Shoeshine Fri 14 Sep 2007, 14:37

doctorspin wrote:
Shoeshine wrote:Sky now reckon Australia need to win in 9 overs and 3 balls to knock England out. There's no way they'll go for that.

C.H.R.I.S. S.C.H.O.E.F.I.E.L.D.

He'll probably take 6-10 - then you've got a problem, cos they might keep him in the side! Very Happy

by Brass Monkey Fri 14 Sep 2007, 14:37

tac wrote:Seemed very controlled but for one over from Token . . . Pup did well it seems . . .

Mmm, dunno, were GB Hogg to be playing I seriously don't think we'd have got a ton.

by doctorspin Fri 14 Sep 2007, 14:38

Shoeshine wrote:
doctorspin wrote:
Shoeshine wrote:Sky now reckon Australia need to win in 9 overs and 3 balls to knock England out. There's no way they'll go for that.

C.H.R.I.S. S.C.H.O.E.F.I.E.L.D.

He'll probably take 6-10 - then you've got a problem, cos they might keep him in the side!

G.Jones...........performance is irrelevant. S.C.H.O.E.F.I.E.L.D. is in forever.

by Peregrine Periwinkle Fri 14 Sep 2007, 14:39

Top quality bowling from the Aussies, despite brain fade over non-selection of Hogg.

No chance of getting 136 in 9.3 overs (57 balls) ...... or is there???

by doremi Fri 14 Sep 2007, 14:39

JKLever wrote:
doremi wrote:Allout in 20 overs. Not that good.

Its T20, hit or get out stuff Doremi

Havent you watched any 20/20 gubbins...

Before this WC, India's only match, one county match of Northants', another of some county I don't remember and snatches of the WI-England series.

by doremi Fri 14 Sep 2007, 14:41

Dot ball to start.

by doremi Fri 14 Sep 2007, 14:44

Six off the over.

by doremi Fri 14 Sep 2007, 14:45

Flintoff to open with Broad. Great ball first up.

by Shoeshine Fri 14 Sep 2007, 14:51

God's sake. Both openers edge it through the vacant slip area for four.

by Sponsored content