This England Team is Rubbish

lardbucket wrote:
Has anything changed since 'Rachel' posted this?

Flintoff's back.... ........


.................


.....

now, phuck orf.

Vaughan's gone.

taipan wrote:Vaughan's gone.

He'll be in the side in the Windies instead of Bell.

Forward thinking is that.

JKLever wrote:

taipan wrote:Vaughan's gone.

He'll be in the side in the Windies instead of Bell.

Forward thinking is that.

Phucking disgrace that is too. If you think about it, Ian Ronald Bell has been phucking excellent - I cite the fact he did phuck all in the Ashes, phuck all against India bar a brace of 50's in the last test, hence keeping his place, then went to NZ and did phuck all apart from tank their shittest attack for a ton, then did phuck all against them in the return, then scored 199, then did phuck all up until this point.

The bloke should be an ATG now.

He'll be knighted in due course, you wait and see.

lardbucket wrote:He'll be knighted in due course, you wait and see.

I loved the whole 'Oooh, Ian Bell's got 600 runs this year **sound of orgasm in the background**' Yep, he has you qunt, at an average of 37, with 199 of those runs coming in a single innings.

Weak-arsed, phuck-faced little lucky shit.

Arise, Sir Ian of Birmingham.

Brass Monkey wrote:

lardbucket wrote:He'll be knighted in due course, you wait and see.

I loved the whole 'Oooh, Ian Bell's got 600 runs this year **sound of orgasm in the background**' Yep, he has you qunt, at an average of 37, with 199 of those runs coming in a single innings.

Weak-arsed, phuck-faced little lucky shit.

yes Chas

taipan wrote:

Brass Monkey wrote:

lardbucket wrote:He'll be knighted in due course, you wait and see.

I loved the whole 'Oooh, Ian Bell's got 600 runs this year **sound of orgasm in the background**' Yep, he has you qunt, at an average of 37, with 199 of those runs coming in a single innings.

Weak-arsed, phuck-faced little lucky shit.

yes Chas

Check this:
Last two years(i.e. from the Ashes):
27 Tests, 1685 runs @ 37.44 - this includes his 'career-savers' versus India (63 & 67), his 110 at Napier and his 199 against SA. Obviously you don't take them out, but it alludes to a donkey-punchee at number 3... had the luxury of 10 Tests against the bottom two non-minnows.

Disgrace.

Donkey-punchee.

TBH skulls, his stats are 'funnier' than that comment. Just look at them. Someone defend him, please!! I'd love to see the 'give him time'rs put his case forward. Because all I see is ignominy.

Aye. Many of us Antipodeans feel similarly about Shane Watson, except the saving grace is that Watson is not a walk-up start in the Aus side.

skully wrote:Aye. Many of us Antipodeans feel similarly about Shane Watson, except the saving grace is that Watson is not a walk-up start in the Aus side.

Plus at least he can bowl a bit. And doesn't bat in the most important position in the team. I get your point though. The likes of White and Siddle are joke selections.

Aye. It's like the first point of order in a selection meeting is to divide up the lines of Crack evenly, have few snorts and then get about the business of picking the best XI to represent the country.

It's surely better than the chocolate/sussex f*ckfest we get every time.

Well, actually, it's about even.

So Sussex = NSW when it comes to starting points for selection of the National XI?

The paper bags are extra brown.

Ah, no wonder I have an affinity with the Mother Country. Go Spivs, go Sussex?

skully wrote:So Sussex = NSW when it comes to starting points for selection of the National XI?

Sussex = The New Surrey. Doesn't matter how gash, as long as he plays for Sussex.

Brass Monkey wrote:TBH skulls, his stats are 'funnier' than that comment. Just look at them. Someone defend him, please!! I'd love to see the 'give him time'rs put his case forward. Because all I see is ignominy.

Peter Sussex did to the BBC!!!!

I think he used the, he's a young batsman learning his trade line!!!

****** THUNDERQUNT!!!

45 tests and still learning his trade!!!!!!

Looking at the title of this thread!!! Yes England are fairly rubbish! Main problem is that we keep sticking with the same farking inadequates, whilst players who have shown they have the quanlity carry the drinks and don't get a look in!!