Re: Ban Bradman!

by freddled gruntbuggly Wed 04 Mar 2009, 08:41

Henry wrote:Well I wouldn't say that in real life because i'm not as phucked in the head as Bradman. People who know me know that i'm not afraid to speak my mind.

qmy just spoke his mind. Said what had occured to more minds than his. If you can get away with your drivel, taccy with his deliberate nastiness, Bucky with his sheer insanity, then qmy's a long way back in the queue for a banning.
Pull your head in, mudgy-wudgy.

by skully Wed 04 Mar 2009, 09:15

As I said, PMSL @ Trev.

This whole thread is as laughable as Trev is gay.

And I wonder if Trev will show his little troll head in qmy's "Clarification!" thread.

by Invader Zim Wed 04 Mar 2009, 10:18

JKLever wrote:Does come accross as a bit of a twat however...

Not the only one.

by tac Wed 04 Mar 2009, 10:20

So is this farkin massive storm in a tea-cup not over yet?

by skully Wed 04 Mar 2009, 10:49

Only if Trev wants it to be. shrug

by tac Wed 04 Mar 2009, 10:53

dunno, skull, seems you and few others have been doing a good job in keeping it going . . .

by skully Wed 04 Mar 2009, 10:57

Trev is probably too smashed to be in a state to respond anyway. The boy can't handle his sake.

by Guest Wed 04 Mar 2009, 10:59

Just think JKL, if Trev was a woman, you could blame it on PMT.

by skully Wed 04 Mar 2009, 11:00

Trev is a pre-menstral woman.

by JKLever Wed 04 Mar 2009, 11:17

Demelza wrote:Just think JKL, if Trev was a woman, you could blame it on PMT.

He isn't a cereal offender though... snap,crackle,pop?

by taipan Wed 04 Mar 2009, 11:18

nah, he just lies there and bangs.

by Invader Zim Wed 04 Mar 2009, 11:19

So Trev is claiming he was pissed?

Wow. He really IS a weak dog.

by skully Wed 04 Mar 2009, 11:22

Was there ever any doubt?

by PeterCS Wed 04 Mar 2009, 11:57

Just a view ... bandwagons of scorn are not a pleasant sight, however heinous the offender is considered to be. And how bitter his attitudes may be to Australian sport.

Bear-baiting humour, pillory-type revenge, and all that. Medieval? Ancient? I think I prefer Python. ("YES - WE ARE ALL INDIVIDUALS. .... ") Smile

by lardbucket Wed 04 Mar 2009, 11:58

PeterCS wrote:Just a view ... bandwagons of scorn

scorn flakes?

by PeterCS Wed 04 Mar 2009, 12:01

scornucopia.

by taipan Wed 04 Mar 2009, 13:47

So Trev, were you pissed?

by Henry Wed 04 Mar 2009, 13:51

Who gives a f*ck?

by Zat Thu 05 Mar 2009, 23:34

What a pissweak thread.

Jay won't ban anyone, ever.

by OP Tipping Thu 05 Mar 2009, 23:36

Okay, I withdraw my endorsement of operation Ban Bradman.

I still think the comment was a little over the line at such an early stage, but hey, not everyone has to be like me.

by embee Thu 05 Mar 2009, 23:38

Zat wrote:What a pissweak thread.

Jay won't ban anyone, ever.

Sarah

Lags

Uniguy

by Zat Thu 05 Mar 2009, 23:58

embee wrote:
Zat wrote:What a pissweak thread.

Jay won't ban anyone, ever.

Sarah

Lags

Uniguy

The list of people deserving to be banned, who haven't been, is longer.

And were they banned? Or did they actually decide to leave? If they were banned, then it makes a mockery of some other (in)actions here.

by LeFromage Fri 06 Mar 2009, 00:04

embee wrote:
Zat wrote:What a pissweak thread.

Jay won't ban anyone, ever.

Sarah

Lags

Uniguy

Not banned. I believe she visits here periodically.

Not banned. "Big Bertha". Hasn't been by since his gay chat website was launched.

Uniguy was someone's multiple ID. Tac's, I think.

by HH_pink Fri 06 Mar 2009, 00:04

Jay takes out multiple IDs. I've been "banned" once for creating another ID (kuntree 'lee' senufink or something like that). But he doesn't ban individuals, or what he thinks are individuals.

by Zat Fri 06 Mar 2009, 00:36

Thx Jay.

by Sponsored content