Now I know how lags felt

Dello wrote:don't care, don't care, don't care...

So, being the Admin, you've got carte blanche on what to care about?

Well, do you mind that I care about 'Dave Sales for England'?

Batfink Begins wrote:

Dello wrote:don't care, don't care, don't care...

So, being the Admin, you've got carte blanche on what to care about?

Being me I have carte blanche on what to care about.

Dello wrote:Being me I have carte blanche on what to care about.

Please inform me what that is at some point and I'll try and care about it. See how that worked, even though I may not care about it, I'll try. There's lesson one to being a conciencious forummer.

Unless lesson two involves some sort of hand relief, I'm not interested.

Dello wrote:Unless lesson two involves some sort of hand relief, I'm not interested.

Well, I could 'talk' dirty while you sort yourself out. Otherwise I'm at a loss

Batfink Begins wrote:

taipan wrote:

Batfink Begins wrote:Yes Demelza, same literative style.

In the old days NFI, used to mail me to vote for his car on the Car boards.

Happy times.

We all know NFI likes cars, bit of Brentford, Arsenal, Middlesex, hates Ramprakash, writes a certain way etc. It's only a secret in Ian's mind.

My tag on Pak Passion is still awaiting the mod to approve it...been 24 hours so far.

You're farked then.

They are probably not letting in newcomers as they suspect them all of being FB spies after fluffy's warning.

Invader Zim wrote:My tag on Pak Passion is still awaiting the mod to approve it...been 24 hours so far.

Mine hasn't been approved by all accounts. A very, very accepting and gregarious bunch. Almost too friendly.

Mine has!

holcs wrote:Mine has!

Bet you haven't posted yet

taipan wrote:

holcs wrote:Mine has!

Bet you haven't posted yet

Nope.

Just thought i'd try and see if I could get one.

Don't go there and cause trouble in the name of this board.

yes, bioss!

Dello wrote:Don't go there and cause trouble in the name of this board.

Tell them you are from eBaum's World. That's what most troublemakers do!

WideWally wrote:

Dello wrote:Don't go there and cause trouble in the name of this board.

Tell them you are from eBaum's World. That's what most troublemakers do!

I'll tell them i'm an American!!!

holcs wrote:Mine has!

Ah, maybe filo is vetoing them singularly through the medium of PM. You know how PMs are the order of the day.

tac wrote:You're farked then.

They are probably not letting in newcomers as they suspect them all of being FB spies after fluffy's warning.

FFS, so Lord Rollerdoor Darby will never even get to post?

Batfink Begins wrote:

holcs wrote:Mine has!

Ah, maybe filo is vetoing them singularly through the medium of PM. You know how PMs are the order of the day.

Well as soon as she reads this you are farked.

I was actually looking forward to explaining to the good folks that I was a Telecom Indian Wrestler. The only Lord alive who could Indian wrestle by telephone. I'd have Uri Geller eating out of his head.

My ID is a make of India Pickup!

holcs wrote:My ID is a make of India Pickup!

I am not saying what mine is. It is going to drive Filo mad trying to work it out. Luckily I registered months ago

Invader Zim wrote:Rizzo never posted on the ABC...

Rizzo was on C4 when I joined in 2005 - a decent bloke, a pity he disappeared into the ether.

Dello wrote: You're inferring that I questioned the rationale of some of your debating due to your gender. Or my gender.

What? Because there was no smiley, you took that comment literally?

Note to self: type –JOKE or include smiley when teasing Dello!

Dello wrote: Much in the same way as you inferred that those who didn't take up the case of John Holder - a "non-white umpire", in your words - were turning a blind eye to it due to his race, it was a baseless and stupid comment which showed up your own prejudices and no-one else's.

That’s your interpretation, mine is different, It is you, Dello who stated:

“Teams can't pick and choose who officiates their games” (Page 27 of the Hair thread)


In response to which I raised the matter of Umpire Holder, who was not seen standing in a Test for nine years after the ball was changed while England were bowling because suspicions of illegal tampering” in a WIs game in 1991, a match in which he officiated alongside umpire MJ Kitchen.


JKLever offered this as a possible reason for Holder’s absence: “Holder was selected to umpire by the ECB. If they felt he was not up to scratch they didn't have to appoint him.” (Page 27, Hair thread)


At holcs polite request I dropped the Holder matter. It is JKLever who raised the Holder topic again with: “Filo, since you've taken this onto the Pak Passion board & I dont have an account there...” (Page 45, Hair thread).


Incidentally JKL, you didn’t explain why you felt it necessary, or acceptable, to forward to tac, parts of a private message from me to you, and then more if it in public in this thread. I’d posted my “absolute hypocrisy” comment on page 24 of that Hair thread.

But I note that you felt it was “Completely acceptable” that Hair disclosed a private conversation with Rudi Koertzen in his Tribunal, (Page 44, Hair thread), whereas this act has been seen as a betrayal of friendship, and “beyond the pale “ (A Pyrrhic victory for Hair: http://content-uk.cricinfo.com/ci-icc/content/story/314700.html).