Re: Should Red STFU?

by embee Thu 12 Mar 2009, 06:58

Zat wrote:
Batman wrote:
Zat wrote:And you lose your bet, too. Money to the cancer research chairty of your choice. Thanks.

Happy to lose a bet once in a while. Will spend it feeding a poor kid living on the streets for sure this weekend.
OK, that works for me. Now, as for the proof of your accusation. I'm waiting.

And please make sure you don't confuse my posts with embee's or Bradman's as you have seemingly already done.

Us Whiteys all look alike

by Zat Thu 12 Mar 2009, 06:59

embee wrote:
Zat wrote:
Batman wrote:
Zat wrote:And you lose your bet, too. Money to the cancer research chairty of your choice. Thanks.

Happy to lose a bet once in a while. Will spend it feeding a poor kid living on the streets for sure this weekend.
OK, that works for me. Now, as for the proof of your accusation. I'm waiting.

And please make sure you don't confuse my posts with embee's or Bradman's as you have seemingly already done.

Us Whiteys all look alike

I wasn't going to say it. Mind you, could've been the first time in my life I played the race card.

And embee, ftr, can you confirm that you are not me?

by embee Thu 12 Mar 2009, 06:59

taipan wrote:
Batman wrote:
Zat wrote:And you lose your bet, too. Money to the cancer research chairty of your choice. Thanks.

Happy to lose a bet once in a while. Will spend it feeding a poor kid living on the streets for sure this weekend.

Slumdog Millionaire?

The George Michael story

by embee Thu 12 Mar 2009, 07:01

I'm not Zat ...or Bradman ...or Zimmy ...but I was Carl Rackemann

by Zat Thu 12 Mar 2009, 07:01

embee wrote:
taipan wrote:
Batman wrote:
Zat wrote:And you lose your bet, too. Money to the cancer research chairty of your choice. Thanks.

Happy to lose a bet once in a while. Will spend it feeding a poor kid living on the streets for sure this weekend.

Slumdog Millionaire?

The ~~George~~ Michael Jackson story

Fixed

by tac Thu 12 Mar 2009, 07:03

embee wrote:I'm not Zat ...or Bradman ...or Zimmy ...but I was Carl Rackemann

hehehe . . . good times

by Zat Thu 12 Mar 2009, 07:05

Zat wrote:
Batman wrote:I didn't accuse you of any of the above. Merely pointed out the hypocrisy with which you choose to rubbish a poll thread and patronize some others where it suits you. Get a grip on yourself!
Ah well. It was nice while the peace lasted. It was too good to be true.
Find the proof of your accusation, which I have highlighted, that I rubbished the specific poll thread which you mentioned.

by Brass Monkey Thu 12 Mar 2009, 12:31

Like a bunch of weasels in a bag fighting over one biscuit.

by DJ_Smerk Thu 12 Mar 2009, 15:30

Let's make a Favourite Biscuit poll?

My favourite is Chocolate. Some peoples favourite biscuits are STFU. Although that just leaves a sour taste in one's mouth.

by PeterCS Thu 12 Mar 2009, 17:48

Half a biscuit.

Half a dross biscuit.

by Zat Thu 12 Mar 2009, 20:59

Zat wrote:
Zat wrote:
Batman wrote:I didn't accuse you of any of the above. Merely pointed out the hypocrisy with which you choose to rubbish a poll thread and patronize some others where it suits you. Get a grip on yourself!
Ah well. It was nice while the peace lasted. It was too good to be true.
Find the proof of your accusation, which I have highlighted, that I rubbished the specific poll thread which you mentioned.

I take it that you're still hunting for your proof, some 12 hours after the event, Vikas. Come on, we're waiting...

by Zat Fri 13 Mar 2009, 05:38

Coming up on 24 hours now. And still no proof from Vikas. Why? Because he's made it all up and is hiding. Soft.

by skully Fri 13 Mar 2009, 05:38

Erm, you had doubts?

by tac Fri 13 Mar 2009, 05:39

OH, dear . . . zatty in turning the tables on his stalker shocker . . .

by Zat Fri 13 Mar 2009, 05:49

And the more people who see the subi sook exposed for the gutless turd he is, the better. IM(NS)HO.

by skully Fri 13 Mar 2009, 05:50

Zat wrote:And the more people who see the subi sook exposed for the gutless turd he is, the better. IM(NS)HO.

But Zog, we know. shrug

by Zat Fri 13 Mar 2009, 05:51

Maybe some of his 'mates' might realise what a tool he is.

by taipan Fri 13 Mar 2009, 05:52

Zat wrote:Maybe some of his 'mates' might realise what a tool he is.

His mates?

by skully Fri 13 Mar 2009, 05:53

You're kidding, right?

by Zat Fri 13 Mar 2009, 05:53

The forum subi bloc. Hence the ' ' around the word 'mates'

by skully Fri 13 Mar 2009, 06:00

I repeat, you're kidding right?

Subis hate each other's guts until a whitey pokes one of them with a stick. Then it's all rally around the retard time.

by tac Fri 13 Mar 2009, 06:01

by Zat Fri 13 Mar 2009, 06:33

skully wrote:I repeat, you're kidding right?

Subis hate each other's guts until a whitey pokes one of them with a stick. Then it's all rally around the retard time.

Well they all rallied around Vikas last time. Are you suggesting he's a retard?

by skully Fri 13 Mar 2009, 07:16

Well farkin derrrrr.

by Batman Fri 13 Mar 2009, 14:46

Is the master retard having too much spare time on his hands? I was away to attend a meeting out of town whole day and what do I find on return? The master delusionist building up more floors over his castle of delusion.....

Lets take a look at some of the 'accusations' that I 'made':

Batman wrote:So much for setting higher standards for starting threads and polls...
Or is zatty selective on whose polls he chooses to thrash?

Batman wrote: The sand lies in your ears of hypocrisy friend. A look at a couple of your comments in the Insensitive Forummer thread just highlights the level of hypocrisy, is all I wanted to point out.

Batman wrote: The thread was not a sh!tstirrer. Quiet a few blokes made insensitive comments after the Lankan team nearly got killed in Pak and your responses just reveal the hypocrisy I mentioned. When someone like Bucky makes insensitive comments about Bushfires in Aus, it is inhuman, but when someone else makes the same quntish cracks about some subi players and are taken to task, it becomes a sh!tstirring bad thread. Right! Hypocrisy it is...

In all of my posts here, no where have I accused you of anything else that happened elsewhere and not mixed you up for posts of anybody else either. I merely said you were being hypocritical when you commented on the Insensitive poll thread. You were the one who started derogatory responses at every response above. You don’t thrash such polls when some of your friends start it or when the targets are people who you like thrashing yourself [Bucky, Red, Trev, SG etc,]. You may call the thread worst and all that. It’s your opinion. I have nothing against your comments. Some comments others made regarding MuMu may have been insensitive to some us. I put it in a poll. Lots of people took it in right spirit and moved on. I think your post below was what was sh!tstirring and where I think your response was hypocritical and where I think you re-started a word war again…..

Zat wrote:It disappoints me. I thought I'd always be able to make a thread worse than anything anyone else came up with. But the standards of some people are sinking to undreamed of lows

Again I repeat. That thread was started out of a certain feeling of hurt and nowhere were you mentioned or accused of anything else. I have not made a single accusation at you save say that you are hypocritical in your responses and I stick by it. Nowhere have your comments been mixed with anyone else [tac, skully, bradman, embee or anyone else]. It is just tad ironic you comment on other peoples forumming standards when you yourself have not been a paragaon of high quality forumming yourself. You have had more than your share of sh!tstirring in the past. Your massive ego trip and verbal diarohhea all over this thread in retribution proves what I said before. About you being hypocritical. I will also repeat what I said the last time we fragged a few months back. Don't be a bitch and don't hand out what you can't take back. It makes you look like a low grade sooking whinging wimp. If you still feel the need to drag this to eternity, waste your time over it for what it’s worth. An innocent lamb, you ain't. If thumping your chest over your own low standards of forumming and browbeating on the internet and wasting a day seeking 'answers' is what gets your day through than keep it up Tarzan! Just proves who is a real loser here!

cyclops

by Sponsored content