Re: Should Red STFU?

by embee Wed 11 Mar 2009, 04:35

Zat wrote:
Batman wrote:
Zat wrote:
Batman wrote:So much for setting higher standards for starting threads and polls...
Or is zatty selective on whose polls he chooses to thrash?
You got sand in your vagina again Batty? What do you allege I've done this time?

The sand lies in your ears of hypocrisy friend. A look at a couple of your comments in the Insensitive Forummer thread just highlights the level of hypocrisy, is all I wanted to point out.
Jeez you're fuc'ked in the head Vikas.
My sum total of contribution to that thread was:
Zat wrote:Worst.

Thread.

Ever.
Zat wrote:It disappoints me. I thought I'd always be able to make a thread worse than anything anyone else came up with. But the standards of some people are sinking to undreamed of lows.
and
Zat wrote:Not hunting, got enough thank you.
And sorry pal, but your thread, slagging off forumers across the board and designed to be nothing more than a shitstorm starter still ranks as amongst the worst.

I could've started a worse thread. Maybe 'Which forumer is a deadshit qunt with no brains?' and attached a nifty poll, and watched as people decided to argue about it.

How my entering into a bit of light hearted banter with Demelza, and a pseudo-argument with Smerky, without even commenting on the original topic of the thread, or even voting in the poll contained in it, can be defined as hypocrisy... Well, I'd like to hear your explanation. Feel free to explain Or is your natural, in0-built, 'Oh, I haven't taken a baseless shot at an Aussie for a while, so I'll say something to get Zat fired up' reflex working again.

So, a rational explanation please.

And don;t try to play the 'only joking' card. Or accuse me of NSR. You were just being a miserable qunt.

Vikas is still pissed off at you for "stalking" him with the sheep farquing emoticon about a year ago

by tac Wed 11 Mar 2009, 04:49

I thought it was a dog-farking emoticon, MB, but I bow to your greater experience . . .

by embee Wed 11 Mar 2009, 04:59

bucks was the dog farquer

by tac Wed 11 Mar 2009, 05:01

Fairy muff

by Zat Wed 11 Mar 2009, 06:17

I'd forgotten those.

But from memory...
Bucky - - > Should Red STFU? - Page 3 Ani_ic10

Vikas - - > Should Red STFU? - Page 3 Ani_sh10

Zimi - - > Should Red STFU? - Page 3 Ani_ic10

Trev - - > Should Red STFU? - Page 3 Ani_ga10

by Zat Wed 11 Mar 2009, 06:18

And a new one for Red.

Should Red STFU? - Page 3 Smilie11

by tac Wed 11 Mar 2009, 06:18

That was your halcyon period, zatty . . .

by taipan Wed 11 Mar 2009, 06:19

Zat wrote:I'd forgotten those.

But from memory...
Bucky - - >
Vikas - - >
Zimi - - >
Trev - - >

I seem to recall the sheep one as being slightly different.

by Zat Wed 11 Mar 2009, 06:24

taipan wrote:
Zat wrote:I'd forgotten those.

But from memory...
Bucky - - >
Vikas - - >
Zimi - - >
Trev - - >

I seem to recall the sheep one as being slightly different.

Maybe it was just the repetition factor. That's the only sheep one in my servimg account. It was enough to drive poor Batty batty.

by skully Wed 11 Mar 2009, 06:27

Vikas in "no sense of humour" shock.

by Zat Wed 11 Mar 2009, 06:27

tac wrote:That was your halcyon period, zatty . . .

Thanks taccy. This one could be you... Should Red STFU? - Page 3 Ani_ma10

And WW had a great avatar, a lot like a real-life version of Should Red STFU? - Page 3 Ani_dr10

by Zat Wed 11 Mar 2009, 06:29

skully wrote:Vikas in "no sense of humour" shock.

Yeah. Maybe if i'd used Should Red STFU? - Page 3 Ani_as10

he mightn't have gotten so upset.

by skully Wed 11 Mar 2009, 06:34

How's the Merc going? Must have that "new car" smell just about gawn now?

by tac Wed 11 Mar 2009, 06:34

skully wrote:How's the Merc going? Must have that "new car" smell just about gawn now?

Phurt . . . I bet he hasn't even taken the plastic off the seats yet . . .

by Zat Wed 11 Mar 2009, 06:36

Sadly, yes. Had the three-month service yesterday. Given that I've only had the car for two months, I'm driving it a few km too many. But do you blame me? (Of course, when the fleet office start looking at the figures they might get a tad upset. Qunts.)

by skully Wed 11 Mar 2009, 06:36

The plastic stops the spoof staining.

by Zat Wed 11 Mar 2009, 06:37

tac wrote:
skully wrote:How's the Merc going? Must have that "new car" smell just about gawn now?

Phurt . . . I bet he hasn't even taken the plastic off the seats yet . . .

The seats are the finest leather. WTF would you leave the plastic on them?

by skully Wed 11 Mar 2009, 06:37

Zat wrote:Sadly, yes. Had the three-month service yesterday. Given that I've only had the car for two months, I'm driving it a few km too many. But do you blame me? (Of course, when the fleet office start looking at the figures they might get a tad upset. Qunts.)

Yeah, I have to carefully manage my Kms as well, FBT and all that twaddle. Farkin' sh!ts me to tears. Evil or Very Mad

by Zat Wed 11 Mar 2009, 06:39

I managed to get the company to pick up the FBT. Farked if I was going to pay it.

by taipan Wed 11 Mar 2009, 06:39

Zat wrote:Sadly, yes. Had the three-month service yesterday. Given that I've only had the car for two months, I'm driving it a few km too many. But do you blame me? (Of course, when the fleet office start looking at the figures they might get a tad upset. Qunts.)

3 months?

We work on 15 000 km here.

by Zat Wed 11 Mar 2009, 06:42

3 months from delivery, or 5000 km, for an initial check. Then as required when the nifty little 'service' light comes on. They reckon usually around 15000 km, but could be more.

by Batman Wed 11 Mar 2009, 07:28

Zat wrote:
Batman wrote:
Zat wrote:
Batman wrote:So much for setting higher standards for starting threads and polls...
Or is zatty selective on whose polls he chooses to thrash?
You got sand in your vagina again Batty? What do you allege I've done this time?

The sand lies in your ears of hypocrisy friend. A look at a couple of your comments in the Insensitive Forummer thread just highlights the level of hypocrisy, is all I wanted to point out.
Jeez you're fuc'ked in the head Vikas.
My sum total of contribution to that thread was:
Zat wrote:Worst.

Thread.

Ever.
Zat wrote:It disappoints me. I thought I'd always be able to make a thread worse than anything anyone else came up with. But the standards of some people are sinking to undreamed of lows.
and
Zat wrote:Not hunting, got enough thank you.
And sorry pal, but your thread, slagging off forumers across the board and designed to be nothing more than a shitstorm starter still ranks as amongst the worst.

I could've started a worse thread. Maybe 'Which forumer is a deadshit qunt with no brains?' and attached a nifty poll, and watched as people decided to argue about it.

How my entering into a bit of light hearted banter with Demelza, and a pseudo-argument with Smerky, without even commenting on the original topic of the thread, or even voting in the poll contained in it, can be defined as hypocrisy... Well, I'd like to hear your explanation. Feel free to explain Or is your natural, in0-built, 'Oh, I haven't taken a baseless shot at an Aussie for a while, so I'll say something to get Zat fired up' reflex working again.

So, a rational explanation please.

And don;t try to play the 'only joking' card. Or accuse me of NSR. You were just being a miserable qunt.

The thread was not a sh!tstirrer. Quiet a few blokes made insensitive comments after the Lankan team nearly got killed in Pak and your responses just reveal the hypocrisy I mentioned. When someone like Bucky makes insensitive comments about Bushfires in Aus, it is inhuman, but when someone else makes the same quntish cracks about some subi players and are taken to task, it becomes a sh!tstirring bad thread. Right! Hypocrisy it is...

by Zat Wed 11 Mar 2009, 07:29

You really are f8cked in the head. Goodbye.

by embee Wed 11 Mar 2009, 07:29

Braddles will be glad to know he is quite a few blokes ...

by Zat Wed 11 Mar 2009, 07:30

I'd clarify a bit further, but you seem to be on a buckeroo-type delusional trip at the moment. Try reading through the above instead of gibbering.

by Sponsored content