WIFAN...Peter Roebuck says that Gayle is craven and idle

Roebuck really has the hoys for King Chris

Gayle once again betrayed his position and his talent with a craven and idle performance ill-befitting any Test batsman, let alone an opener and leader called upon to bind together a group of disparate islands.

On and off the field he has chased the dollar, a trait he has learned from posturing past players and instilled in those under his wing. Lacking idealism, he has failed to give his side any sense of direction. A team crying out for leadership has looked in vain towards the languid left-hander. To put it mildly, the notion that he is nurturing a group of talented youngsters capable of upholding the reputation of West Indian cricket is optimistic.

Chris Gayle for 2009

matches played = 7

runs made = 597

highest score = 197

average = 66.33

100's=3

Unfortunately, most of them against England on feather beds. sigh.

Aberforth wrote:Chris Gayle for 2009

matches played = 7

runs made = 597

highest score = 197

average = 66.33

100's=3

Times where he looked like he could give a shit = 0

Aberforth wrote:Roebuck really has the hoys for King Chris

Gayle once again betrayed his position and his talent with a craven and idle performance ill-befitting any Test batsman, let alone an opener and leader called upon to bind together a group of disparate islands.

On and off the field he has chased the dollar, a trait he has learned from posturing past players and instilled in those under his wing. Lacking idealism, he has failed to give his side any sense of direction. A team crying out for leadership has looked in vain towards the languid left-hander. To put it mildly, the notion that he is nurturing a group of talented youngsters capable of upholding the reputation of West Indian cricket is optimistic.

He seems to like attacking WI captains. Used to disparage Lara as well. I don't think the captain is the problem. Hell, Gayle's average has gone up while being captain. We won a test in South Africa, Drew in NZ and regained the Wisden trophy for a while. He's doing something right.I seem to remember the last couple West Indies teams getting hammered when they came to Australia. I don't think blaming the captain is going to get us anywhere. Sarwan and Chanderpaul don't want it. I think Ramdin needs a little more time. I know some in the Australian media call for Ganga to be captain. But captaining Trinidad and captaining the WI are 2 different things. He averages 25 after 48 tests. He can't make the team and also he has captained the WI before in England and had the same disastrous results Gayle had earlier this year.

Why does anyone even care? I can't remember a Roebuck article that wasn't laying into someone or other - the guy's a hack.

Peter Roebuck has issues with West Indians resulting from some beef he had with Richards decades ago. He has been regularly taking pot shots at West Indian captains for some time now.

He takes pot-shots at all the captains. It makes him feel important. Probably.

Gayle obviously needs a spanking.


But as for Roebuck having the hoys for him ..... where does cycling come into it?

PeterCS wrote:Gayle obviously needs a spanking.


But as for Roebuck having the hoys for him ..... where does cycling come into it?

Lots of pumping involved perhaps?

Roebuck is an idiot and I have stopped reading his articles tbh. We know we have problems, we know Gayle is not an ideal captain but the players like playing under him and that is that. Roebuck makes stuff up about players to try and prove his points because he is incapable of doing that using the power of words. That, allied with his history of borderline racism towards West Indians of African descent makes him irrelevant IMHO.

Actually, although I do agree that Roebuck is a bit of a cock at the very least, I do find his articles worth reading, even if I think he's taken leave of his senses on a particular issue.

Nah. Not worth reading at all. Hyperbolic and hysterical. Venomous little f*cker is hungry for spanking boys and his lack of opportunity has sent him over the edge.

I am taking a vow not to open any thread with Roebuck's name on it.

starting when?

it still counts if someone else reads the thread for you, taips ... or if you read it as Pixie ...

So when someone starts a thread entitled Roebuck on Taips....

Roebuck taips with two fingers