England v Pakistan, 3rd Test , The Oval, Aug 18-22, 2010

taipan wrote:

Red wrote:

tac wrote:It's not because you're wrong, Red, we're all used to you being so .. . it's because you're such a smarmy litlte sh1te when someone else makes even a simple typo . .then you go waving your tiny c0ck around (no wonder you pretend to be a chick) and bigging yourself up . . .

Actually I ignore most of the typos/spellos these days. Think you'll find it's Taipan who pounces on them, especially any I might make.

Um Red, you might find all of these "quotes" have been mentioned many times on this forum.

And yes, I did pounce on your Collngwood typo, as I found it quite funny that you profess to support the team.

Maybe so, but if the stats guru himself can confuse attribution, anyone can.

I don't profess to support Collngwood (sic), I do.

Red wrote:

taipan wrote:

Red wrote:

tac wrote:It's not because you're wrong, Red, we're all used to you being so .. . it's because you're such a smarmy litlte sh1te when someone else makes even a simple typo . .then you go waving your tiny c0ck around (no wonder you pretend to be a chick) and bigging yourself up . . .

Actually I ignore most of the typos/spellos these days. Think you'll find it's Taipan who pounces on them, especially any I might make.

Um Red, you might find all of these "quotes" have been mentioned many times on this forum.

And yes, I did pounce on your Collngwood typo, as I found it quite funny that you profess to support the team.

Maybe so, but if the stats guru himself can confuse attribution, anyone can.

I don't profess to support Collngwood (sic), I do.

So AD c*cks up, it's okay for you to do so. Interesting logic. Skully might also have something to say about the stats bit.

Even more reason to get the spelling right.

Meh, trawling through piles of stats is bound to produce the odd error, be it a transcription error, omission or poor qualification. I'm pretty sure most people don't give a fark.

And I know MB loves the opportunity it gives him to poke the SGDT with a stick.

I'm also sure most people don't GAF about typos, but you reap what you sow. Most of us limit ourselves to the obligatory WTAAS response.

skully wrote:Meh, trawling through piles of stats is bound to produce the odd error, be it a transcription error, omission or poor qualification. I'm pretty sure most people don't give a fark.

She was calling AD the stats guru.

Yes, I know, but I was responding on behalf of us stats geeks, and your line about "skully might have something to say about the stats bit".

taipan wrote:

skully wrote:Meh, trawling through piles of stats is bound to produce the odd error, be it a transcription error, omission or poor qualification. I'm pretty sure most people don't give a fark.

She was calling AD the stats guru.

Maybe, but I am a usurper of that appellation which properly belongs to Skully - I am just the Bangladesh of stats gurus if not an Associate Member of the club. Skully's only challenger at the head of the table is Wide Wally who, sadly, does not contribute as much as he used to.

Postcards From the Sledge

MB is the Billy The Kid of Stats.

Belated congrats to Pakistan for winning this test.

Indeed, not the best result to have when you're feeling like utter carp!

I spent the last day of the test throwing up so missed it altogether, looks like the Paksters almost bottled it in the end.

Swann as always honest and straightforward,

Let's face it, we batted like morons twice - me included.

Good to see there are cricketers left who don't know how to sugarcoat their comments in press.