Re: Sri Lanka v Australia, 2nd Test, Kandy, 8-12 Sep, 2011

by JGK Thu 08 Sep 2011, 09:32

Hussey on. WTF?

by Big Dog Thu 08 Sep 2011, 09:32

JGK wrote:What? Our Nath? What did he say?

Nath: "@Simo How does Australia's attack lack variation? Copeland hits a line and length, Harris bowls right arm menacing balls, Mitch sprays them everywhere, Lyon is a tweaker and Watto bowls pretty decent medium fast. Which two of them are alike, or all 5 given that they lack variation?"

by JGK Thu 08 Sep 2011, 09:32

And FMD if he doesn't get Sanga with his 3rd ball.

Michael Clarke you genius.

by skully Thu 08 Sep 2011, 09:33

Fark me, Pup pulls off a masterstroke!!!!!

by Henry Thu 08 Sep 2011, 09:33

I can't believe Sanga has done that.

by Big Dog Thu 08 Sep 2011, 09:33

JGK wrote:Hussey on. WTF?

It worked

by Brass Monkey Thu 08 Sep 2011, 09:33

Michael Hussey gets Sanga!!!!

by skully Thu 08 Sep 2011, 09:34

Big Dog wrote:
Nath: "@Simo How does Australia's attack lack variation? Copeland hits a line and length, Harris bowls right arm menacing balls, Mitch sprays them everywhere, Lyon is a tweaker and Watto bowls pretty decent medium fast. Which two of them are alike, or all 5 given that they lack variation?"

Heh. Good on ya, Nath!! Very Happy

by JGK Thu 08 Sep 2011, 09:34

Big Dog wrote:
JGK wrote:What? Our Nath? What did he say?

Nath: "@Simo How does Australia's attack lack variation? Copeland hits a line and length, Harris bowls right arm menacing balls, Mitch sprays them everywhere, Lyon is a tweaker and Watto bowls pretty decent medium fast. Which two of them are alike, or all 5 given that they lack variation?"

Is that our Nath? Good stuff either way.

by skully Thu 08 Sep 2011, 09:35

That Simo sounds like a right dumb qunt. Very Happy

by JGK Thu 08 Sep 2011, 09:37

So Paris is currently topping the batting and bowling averages for the series.

Grouse.

by Big Dog Thu 08 Sep 2011, 09:37

Is that our Nath?

Its a fair guess

by skully Thu 08 Sep 2011, 09:38

Fleas would have 5 wickets and 150 runs by now, if Hildick hadn't ended his career.

by JGK Thu 08 Sep 2011, 09:45

RRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEBBBBBBBBBB!!!!!!

by Red Thu 08 Sep 2011, 09:52

Lankans poor again, partly responsible for their own demise.

by skully Thu 08 Sep 2011, 09:54

Huzzah, lardy just got a wicket. Was in the process of sending him a text and he called me. Half a sentence in, Reeb got Gathews. cheers

by skully Thu 08 Sep 2011, 09:57

Actually, sorry, wasn't Gathews, cos he's still in.

by skully Thu 08 Sep 2011, 10:05

Go Rhino!!!! That's 8-fer.

by Nath Thu 08 Sep 2011, 10:06

JGK wrote:
Big Dog wrote:
JGK wrote:What? Our Nath? What did he say?

Nath: "@Simo How does Australia's attack lack variation? Copeland hits a line and length, Harris bowls right arm menacing balls, Mitch sprays them everywhere, Lyon is a tweaker and Watto bowls pretty decent medium fast. Which two of them are alike, or all 5 given that they lack variation?"

Is that our Nath? Good stuff either way.

sorry to disappoint. wasn't me.

by Brass Monkey Thu 08 Sep 2011, 10:10

Strines are running wild! Not all the woe you softies envisaged.

by lardbucket Thu 08 Sep 2011, 10:13

Aye, Sri Lanka must be utterly appalling. This performance 'cheaps' any win that ANY team might have had over them recently.

by skully Thu 08 Sep 2011, 10:21

by Brass Monkey Thu 08 Sep 2011, 10:35

lardbucket wrote:Aye, Sri Lanka must be utterly appalling. This performance 'cheaps' any win that ANY team might have had over them recently.

We only won 1-0 and that at home, thank f*ck I haven't been waving my c*ck around or I'd have looked like a silly, silly boy.

Doubly so if I'd been saying Aus were a sh!t team, which I haven't.

by Henry Thu 08 Sep 2011, 10:49

Do Sri Lanka have a Coach at the moment?

by Henry Thu 08 Sep 2011, 10:57

Brass Monkey wrote:
lardbucket wrote:Aye, Sri Lanka must be utterly appalling. This performance 'cheaps' any win that ANY team might have had over them recently.

We only won 1-0 and that at home, thank f*ck I haven't been waving my c*ck around or I'd have looked like a silly, silly boy.

Doubly so if I'd been saying Aus were a sh!t team, which I haven't.

Aus wont ever sink to being as poor as say, the Windies have become. They'll always have 11 guys trying their best, at least, with good fielding, tailenders putting up a fight etc. In other words, they might sink to a New Zealand type of sh*tness, but not a Windies type of sh*tness.

by Sponsored content