Haddin is greater than Gilchrist

I dare say Karti is the biggest buffoon I the history of this forum, and there have been many. Looks like cricinfo is the garbage disposal of forums

Anthony_Gonzales wrote:I dare say Karti is the biggest buffoon I the history of this forum, and there have been many. Looks like cricinfo is the garbage disposal of forums

Well cricinfo does have Firdose Moonda as well.

karti's first line - "Adam Gilchrist is considered by many as the greatest wicketkeeper-batsman in Test history, and rightly so"

he isn't saying haddin was better than gilchrist or that gilchrist never played great innings under pressure

he is just restricting those 2 points to ashes series. storm in a teacup

Kartisian logic....before he became Haddin, Haddit and his poor keeping and erratic batting were central factors in previous Ashes defeats

The One wrote:karti's first line - "Adam Gilchrist is considered by many as the greatest wicketkeeper-batsman in Test history, and rightly so"

he isn't saying haddin was better than gilchrist or that gilchrist never played great innings under pressure

he is just restricting those 2 points to ashes series. storm in a teacup

The usual Karti selective stats.

taipan wrote:

The One wrote:karti's first line - "Adam Gilchrist is considered by many as the greatest wicketkeeper-batsman in Test history, and rightly so"

he isn't saying haddin was better than gilchrist or that gilchrist never played great innings under pressure

he is just restricting those 2 points to ashes series. storm in a teacup

The usual Karti selective stats.

very entertaining tho...TO shd tell Karti to start posting here again

horace wrote:

taipan wrote:

The One wrote:karti's first line - "Adam Gilchrist is considered by many as the greatest wicketkeeper-batsman in Test history, and rightly so"

he isn't saying haddin was better than gilchrist or that gilchrist never played great innings under pressure

he is just restricting those 2 points to ashes series. storm in a teacup

The usual Karti selective stats.

very entertaining tho...TO shd tell Karti to start posting here again

Better where he is is. We can call him a qunt and don't have to read reams of stats purporting to prove he is not a qunt.

phurt....i miss the elegant absurdity of Kartisian reductionist (il)logic

Do you 'subscribe' to Narkiteya's Blahg or something, taipan?

Cricinfo doesn't need a subscription.