Oh dear ICC. RIP Test Cricket....

http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci-icc/content/story/535454.html



So the one pitch in the series that produced a result is called "poor" by the ICC. It was a challenging pitch, but the good players still made runs. The ICC really are a bunch of c*nts who will kill test cricket sooner or later and not give a f*ck.

4 days is considered poor?

I wonder what they made of the two day test a few years back....

One one hand they say they want a fair contest between bat and ball, but on the other hand they label that pitch poor.

Have they ever labelled a really flat pitch where 650 plays 600 "poor"? They are dicks.

Aye, wankers.

Gay as f*ck. Triple gay, even. Uncle Hezakiah would say hypothetically that this would never have happened to any in the gay top 4. This is Northants treatment at an international level. Cronyistic f*ckwadded cocksucking f*ckweasels. They can rim me until my rectum prolapses.

Bad day for cricket all round, what with India spitting the dummy over the UDRS as well.

Hussey, Matthews, and Jayawardene were able to make runs.

No fewer than 9 Australian batsmen made double figures on day 1, when the pitch was allegedly at it's 'worst' in terms of favouring bowlers and particularly spin bowlers.

Batsmen with technique, application, and adaptability were able to make good runs, and there should be MORE pitches prepared like this! Batsmen are not examined enough in the modern game.

Oh dear ICC. RIP Test Cricket....

Trev you gay little twerp, if the ICC was as incompetent as your interpretations, we would all be playing baseball.

Sorry, I forgot that Indian fans and players have a soft spot for flat featherbeds where their batsmen can shore up their averages before a tour of England or South Africa.

Henry wrote:Sorry....

Apology accepted. But don't do it again or I'll give you a b!tchslapping.

chris broad engaging in phail once again. well done