Picture Quiz & Gallery: ~ Some Things (Never) Change ...
+4
Brass Monkey
JGK
skully
PeterCS
8 posters
Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: Picture Quiz & Gallery: ~ Some Things (Never) Change ...
All correct as far as identified.
Can you say how 10 and 11 stood out in the Series?
I might as well complete your IDs in 06:
Can you say how 10 and 11 stood out in the Series?
I might as well complete your IDs in 06:
- Spoiler:
- Back row (left-right): Walter Brearley (Lancs), Frank Woolley (Kent), S.F. Barnes (Staffs??), Wilfred Rhodes (Yorks), and Edward Humphreys (Kent).
Middle row: Frank Foster (Warks), Gilbert Jessop (Gloucs), C.B.Fry (capt, Hants), Pelham Warner (Middlesex), Reggie.Spooner (Lancs).
Seated on ground: E.J."Tiger" Smith (Warks), Jack Hobbs (Surrey) and Harry Dean (Lancs).
Good to see all the Lancashire lads there ..... and odd to see only the one classic MCC candidate, no Notts and only one each fromf Yorks and Surrey!
PeterCS- Number of posts : 43743
Reputation : 104
Registration date : 2008-05-23
Flag/Background :
Re: Picture Quiz & Gallery: ~ Some Things (Never) Change ...
- Spoiler:
- Bardsley topped the batting averages and for all sides and scored most runs with 392 runs@65.33 with a top score (also the HS in the tournament) of 164 in the 10-wicket defeat of South Africa at Lord's in the 5th match - going from 32 to 150 before lunch on the 2nd day with George V watching - probably the first time a reigning monarch had watched a Test Match not involving England. Bardsley would later become the oldest Australian player to score a century when he made 193* at Lord's 14 years later at the age of 43 yrs 201 days in Harold Larwood's debut match.
Pegler topped the South African averages and took the most wickets of any of the visitors with 29 wickets@21.34 although he was a long way behind Barnes' tally of 39 wickets@10.36 although Woolley topped the overall averages with 17 wkts@8.34 largely due to his performance in the final game.
The photograph of the England XIII must have been taken before the 2nd match and England's first game in the tournament against South Africa at Lord's starting on 10 June 1912. Humphreys and Dean were left out of the final XI (Humphreys did not appear in the series). Appearing in the series who did not feature on the photograph - Jack Hearne, who played in 5 matches, Scholfield Haigh (1), Ernie Hayes (1), Jack Hitch (2), and Johnny Douglas who only appeared in the final match as a player with Fry retaining the captaincy despite captaining an Ashes-winning side the previous winter. Although Douglas captained 3 touring MCC sides it was not until 1921 that he captained a home side.
Jessop who only played in two matches, both against South Africa at Lord's and Headingley, and made a HS of 16 must have been recalled by the selectors (he had previously played against Australia in the 1909 home series) for nostalgia reasons. He was 38 and clearly past his best. He never played Test cricket again. It is surprising that Fry did not persuade the selectors to include his former Sussex opening partner, Ranjitsinhji, who was only a year older than Jessop but managed to average 50 in the games he played for Sussex.
Nottinghamshire were going through a lean spell. The weather must have affected Trent Bridge even more than Old Trafford. They played only 18 Championship games that season compared to the Champion County Yorkshire's 28 and finished a moderate 8th in the table. George Gunn had gone on Douglas' tour of Australia and had played throughout the series but was omitted the following summer (he had a poor season for Notts with a HS of only 76) and did not play Test cricket again until Calthorpe's tour of the West Indies in 1930 when he became the the third 50yo to play Test cricket.
It was also Fry's last Test series so it was probably fitting that he should captain the side leading it to be the first to be acclaimed World Champions (albeit of a tripartite planet) with a comprehensive victory over Australia (they were bowled out for 65 in their final innings). Fry's last Test innings was a typical captain's knock of 79, fiercely driving the ball despite vicious turn - the last late-flowering of the Golden Age that was to be blown away by the forthcoming apocalypse. When cricket finally returned the era of the gifted amateur and English predominance over Australia, like much else, had gone forever.
Allan D- Number of posts : 6635
Reputation : 16
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Picture Quiz & Gallery: ~ Some Things (Never) Change ...
Bardsley was John Newcombe's uncle.
JGK- Number of posts : 41790
Reputation : 161
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Picture Quiz & Gallery: ~ Some Things (Never) Change ...
Warren Bardsley is the oldest Australian (and 3rd oldest player overall) to score a Test century but what other Test record does he hold?
- Spoiler:
- First player to score a century in each innings of a Test Match when he made 136 & 130 at The Oval in August 1909 on his first tour of England and in Frank Woolley's debut match. He had to wait 17 years until his fourth and last tour of England before making his next century against England with his 193* at Lord's at the age of 43 - then the oldest player to make a century until Jack Hobbs overtook him with 142 at the age of 46 in the final Test of Percy Chapman's tour at the MCG in March 1929
Allan D- Number of posts : 6635
Reputation : 16
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Picture Quiz & Gallery: ~ Some Things (Never) Change ...
I think that sort of covers pictures most of pictures 02-11, or possibly 02-12.
Remaining questions:
What of a positive ID for 08, 09, 12 and (so far unmentioned) 14?
Where were 15 and 16 taken, and what does 15 also tell us?
btw: Fry was (like Ranji) in his 40th year when he finally captained England (and made his last appearances) - older than Jessop. While most batsmen struggled in watery conditions through the Tournament, his batting in particular was pretty much shot to nervous ribbons until that final, partly decisive innings at the Oval - there are many more stories to tell of that and of his captaincy during the Tournament!
His captaincy was much criticised (when selected, and more so for a series of odd-seeming decisions) - as I said, much more could be told. It is likely he got the gig in the first place because he had been largely instrumental in setting up the Triangular Tournament, encouraging the (partly forthcoming) sponsorship from South Africa, doing informal unpaid PR (so to speak) for the event, etc.
I read Fry's Autobiography lately ("Life Worth Living") - a fascinating, urbane, unreliable, in places hair-raising and in many places amusing read - and it was largely that which led to my compiling the bits and pieces for this quiz/gallery.
Remaining questions:
What of a positive ID for 08, 09, 12 and (so far unmentioned) 14?
Where were 15 and 16 taken, and what does 15 also tell us?
btw: Fry was (like Ranji) in his 40th year when he finally captained England (and made his last appearances) - older than Jessop. While most batsmen struggled in watery conditions through the Tournament, his batting in particular was pretty much shot to nervous ribbons until that final, partly decisive innings at the Oval - there are many more stories to tell of that and of his captaincy during the Tournament!
His captaincy was much criticised (when selected, and more so for a series of odd-seeming decisions) - as I said, much more could be told. It is likely he got the gig in the first place because he had been largely instrumental in setting up the Triangular Tournament, encouraging the (partly forthcoming) sponsorship from South Africa, doing informal unpaid PR (so to speak) for the event, etc.
I read Fry's Autobiography lately ("Life Worth Living") - a fascinating, urbane, unreliable, in places hair-raising and in many places amusing read - and it was largely that which led to my compiling the bits and pieces for this quiz/gallery.
PeterCS- Number of posts : 43743
Reputation : 104
Registration date : 2008-05-23
Flag/Background :
Re: Picture Quiz & Gallery: ~ Some Things (Never) Change ...
- Spoiler:
- 08 is Herbie Taylor, who captained South Africa against Douglas' side 18 months later. 09 is a very young-looking and hirsuite Frank Woolley whose bowling proved decisive in the final match. 12 appears to be a remarkably patrician and again hirsute S.F.Barnes, chief wicket-taker in the tournament.
As for 15 & 16 the only completely rain-ruined match was the 6th match and 2nd match between England and Australia at, naturally, Old Trafford where only 5 hours playing time was possible but I'm thinking that it may have been the 4th Match and the 2nd Test between England and South Africa at Headingley since the players appear to be coming off and running off to the side. Headingley was a comparatively new Test venue (since 1899) then and I think there was still no pavilion
Still thinking about the 3 players at 14 - I assume they are Australians
Fry turned 40 four days before the Australians arrived and was the oldest man to captain England at that time apart from Grace. Fry's main problem was his wife who could not bear to be left alone which limited his Test opportunities and meant he never toured apart from his debut, as a bachelor, on Lord Hawke's tour of South Africa in 1896. He had given up the captaincy of Sussex four years previously and switched counties in order to take up the captaincy of the Naval training ship Mercury as well as be near his wife's childhood home. Fry must have known it was rather a last hurrah especially as he was not on particularly good terms with the cricket establishment led by Lord Harris. Had there been better weather (ironically the previous year, 1911, when there was no Test series was one of the hottest summers on record and remains so to this day, exceeding both 1947 and 1976) and more even contests one wonders whether the experiment would have been repeated before the introduction of ODI cricket made a world championship possible.
Fry was also the first official summariser when the BBC broadcast limited commentaries of the 1946 series against India by a young World Service producer named John Arlott. Arlott had been picked because of his ability to pronounce Indian surnames. Arlott was conscious of his lack of fc cricketing experience - limited to a few hours as a fielding substitute at Worcester in 1938 and thought that some expert assistance might be needed. As a Hampshire buff he already knew Fry and thought that Fry's association with Ranji as well as his experience as Secretary to the Indian delegation at the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 would make him an ideal candidate. And so aged 74 Fry would climb the rickety wooden steps two at a time to the makeshift commentary box perched high above Lords, Old Trafford and The Oval to deliver his pearls of wisdom. Initially hailed by Arlott with "Hello, CB" to be met with the stern response of "Captain Fry to you, sir!" (The captain's rank came from his time with the Mercury). His daughter Charis also captained the England women's team making the Frys one of the few father-daughter combinations to have both captained England.
Allan D- Number of posts : 6635
Reputation : 16
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Picture Quiz & Gallery: ~ Some Things (Never) Change ...
09 and 12 are indeed as you say (and are there for the reasons you have given).
In the former case a picture from 1910, I think I remember reading. Not sure of the date of picture 12, but looks again to be around 1910??
As for the others:
(13 &) 14: Skully already identified Clem Hill and Victor Trumper (compiled in 13) near the top of the thread. The only remaining question in the quiz, therefore, is who is 14, and what has he got to do with all of this?
In the former case a picture from 1910, I think I remember reading. Not sure of the date of picture 12, but looks again to be around 1910??
As for the others:
- Spoiler:
- 08 is actually CJ (Jimmy) Matthews, top of the Australian bowling averages for the Tournament and holder of an unlikely world record already mentioned. My purpose in including 08, 09, 10 was therefore to highlight three bowling stars of a largely (rain- and) ball-dominated series.
Controversially, Fry held England's wet-wicket maestro Woolley back in an earlier match - for reasons he justifies well in his Autobiography. (Incidentally, the England captain had all sorts of problems with Pegler during the Tournament.)
Bardsley (11) was the top batsman, with the highest individual innings, as you said with a single run more than Hobbs, and a higher average because of fewer innings. (The valuable all-rounder Charlie Kelleway also scored fairly heavily in the series.) Barnes (12) was overwhelmingly the man with the wickets.
Here is a list of stats and averages for the Tournament:
http://static.espncricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/1910S/1912/TRI-TEST/TRI-TEST_MAY-AUG1912_AVS.html
As for 15 and 16 - on my information at least, these are from the final, deciding match, at the Oval. 15 shows quite nicely that the matches involving England at least could draw a very decent crowd, even in climatically lousy conditions: 16 shows the England team taking the field - presumably that is Fry with a strange, stooping walk at the front? - and below it, two England batsmen and the Australian fielders running like hell as the rain took up yet again. I can't identify the individual players, unfortunately - these shots are fairly rare I think, but the art of the zoom lens was not yet invented, and effective action camerawork at best in its infancy.
(13 &) 14: Skully already identified Clem Hill and Victor Trumper (compiled in 13) near the top of the thread. The only remaining question in the quiz, therefore, is who is 14, and what has he got to do with all of this?
PeterCS- Number of posts : 43743
Reputation : 104
Registration date : 2008-05-23
Flag/Background :
Re: Picture Quiz & Gallery: ~ Some Things (Never) Change ...
- Spoiler:
- 14 would be Peter McAlister who was involved in the fight with Clem Hill which was a prelude to the big row between of Board & the Players
WideWally- Number of posts : 9741
Reputation : 68
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Picture Quiz & Gallery: ~ Some Things (Never) Change ...
That's the man.
The villain of the piece. The representative of the "establishment" of the time.
And this is why I compiled Hill and Trumper in the one picture.
It might have been a cracking series if the six had been there - and there had been a bit less rain .....
The villain of the piece. The representative of the "establishment" of the time.
And this is why I compiled Hill and Trumper in the one picture.
It might have been a cracking series if the six had been there - and there had been a bit less rain .....
PeterCS- Number of posts : 43743
Reputation : 104
Registration date : 2008-05-23
Flag/Background :
Re: Picture Quiz & Gallery: ~ Some Things (Never) Change ...
Welcome back PeterCS, whereyabin?
furriner- Number of posts : 12523
Reputation : 82
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background :
Re: Picture Quiz & Gallery: ~ Some Things (Never) Change ...
PeterCS wrote:That's the man.
The villain of the piece. The representative of the "establishment" of the time.
And this is why I compiled Hill and Trumper in the one picture.
It might have been a cracking series if the six had been there - and there had been a bit less rain .....
The famous fracas before the 4th Test at the MCG in February 1912 which has cropped up before on these boards. This article by Martin Williamson gives the best short account of what transpired and its ramifications for the following tour of England:
"You've Been Asking For A Punch All Night!"
I doubt whether Les Six would have made much difference, rain or no rain, since they had all played in the home series against Douglas' side and been comprehensively beaten. In the end it was Hill and Trumper's loss of form and Hill's loss of the 1911-12 series that determined their fate. The fisticuffs at the selection meeting were simply a sign of how low their morale had dropped in seeing a 1-0 advantage at the start of the series turn into 2-1 against them. In theory the series was retrievable but in reality the Australians had already surrendered the advantage. It may have been the first but was not the only time this was to happen.
Allan D- Number of posts : 6635
Reputation : 16
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Picture Quiz & Gallery: ~ Some Things (Never) Change ...
furriner wrote:Welcome back PeterCS, whereyabin?
Away from this forum!
PeterCS- Number of posts : 43743
Reputation : 104
Registration date : 2008-05-23
Flag/Background :
Re: Picture Quiz & Gallery: ~ Some Things (Never) Change ...
So here for anyone wanting to try is a summary of the answers, with a few more details and a few more pics.
A lot of the "background" to the pictures and names can be found in the posts above, esp. in AD's inputs. So I won't replicate the same info here.
.................................................................................................................
General stuff, and pics 01 to 07:
A lot of the "background" to the pictures and names can be found in the posts above, esp. in AD's inputs. So I won't replicate the same info here.
.................................................................................................................
General stuff, and pics 01 to 07:
- Spoiler:
- The Quiz & Gallery is all centred on the "Triangular Tournament" of May-August 1912, a first attempt at a world cup of cricket (between the three Test-playing nations of the time), which produced the first "timeless" Test (lasting only 4 days, as it happened) and was meant to kick off a similar event every four years.
It proved pretty much a flop, partly because of very poor crowds at the "non-home-team" Tests - it probably didn't help things that the Tournament started off with Aus v SAf, or that the much-heralded SAf team was trounced in two days - and partly because of torrential rain for much of the summer, which meant that three of the nine matches were abandoned and most of the others affected by rain.
And witty - but hardly the publicity the Series needed:
Quiz pictures:
01 - Lord's, 25 June 1912. The Second Day of Eng v Aus, washed out apart from 30 runs betwen Fry and Woolley. Less than two innings were completed during the three days of this Test.
02, 03, 04 - the three captains appointed for the Triangular Tournament: Syd Gregory (Aus), CB Fry (Eng), and Frank Mitchell (SA).
Mitchell, an emergency captain, was Yorkshire through and through (the picture is from his earlier days), but had lived in South Africa and so was available to take a South African role, as was common in those days (.... and as is reversed these days ....).
This is the famous portrait of three rival chums:
05, 06, 07 - the three teams/squads (again in the order Aus, Eng, SA) at some point during the Tournament. Player identifications under the Spoilers in the posts above.
PeterCS- Number of posts : 43743
Reputation : 104
Registration date : 2008-05-23
Flag/Background :
Re: Picture Quiz & Gallery: ~ Some Things (Never) Change ...
Pics 08 to 16:
- Spoiler:
- 08, 09, 10 - Jimmy Matthews, Frank Woolley, Sid Pegler. As explained above, the three average-topping bowlers of Aus, Eng, SA (each with particular individual feats) in a largely ball-dominated series.
11 Warren Bardsley, top run scorer (by one run!), top batting average and highest single score in the Series.
Here's a neat shot of him (from 1912 distance) smiting a four on his way to 121 on the very first day of the Series (at Old Trafford) - with his skipper, Syd Gregory. The next day, Matthews took his two hat-tricks, and South Africa were strung up like a kipper (as perhaps was the series too, even before the rain).
(Which is the best detail I can muster, sadly, from:)
12 Sydney Barnes, much feared, the fast bowler of the decade, who took a ridiculous 39 wickets at just over 10 during the Tournament.
I must admit I wouldn't have liked to face even that beady eye (1910):
13 - Clem Hill and Victor Trumper (noted absentees, with four others)
14 - Peter McAlister - see WWW and AD's words above.
Hill (with his odd grip) and Trumper in happier circumstances:
15 - The Oval, 19 August 1912: the opening day of the deciding match. Plenty of spectators there for a showdown.
16 - The Oval, probably 20 August 1912: (a) England take the field, and (b) two England batsmen, the Australian fielders and two umpires legging it from yet another downpour during a monsoon of an English summer.
Some things never change ....
PeterCS- Number of posts : 43743
Reputation : 104
Registration date : 2008-05-23
Flag/Background :
Re: Picture Quiz & Gallery: ~ Some Things (Never) Change ...
Some more images from the series, and we're home and hosed:
- Spoiler:
- You would have seen 351 runs for 13 wickets if you'd had this ticket, and Macartney's 99. Not bad, although the match was already ruined.
Australian tourists arrive at Southampton
..... signing names liberally:
(tho I don't think the Ashes were officially at stake ... PR maybe ...)
"Spot the Tiger". There don't seem to be many group pictures of the England team. This is a then-trendy compilation.
The South Africans, here looking as if they mean business (rather than cricket?):
And finally a shot of Charlies Kelleway and Macartney with the ageing Lancashire patrician AC MacLaren paying a visit (at Trent Bridge, the 8th match of the series, in early August. This was the one match where South Africa gained a clear upper hand - but rain was the only winner).
PeterCS- Number of posts : 43743
Reputation : 104
Registration date : 2008-05-23
Flag/Background :
Re: Picture Quiz & Gallery: ~ Some Things (Never) Change ...
Men in grey raincoats?
Some good pictures there, Peter.
Some good pictures there, Peter.
lardbucket- Number of posts : 38313
Reputation : 173
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: Picture Quiz & Gallery: ~ Some Things (Never) Change ...
Yep, I think so too.
Oh, if AD is still interested, here is an extra question, perhaps just for you
How many of these England players can you identify? (The set is dated "1912".)
And so as not to spin this thread out any longer, here (under the lid) are your answers.
Don't peek before you have tried answering now!
Oh, if AD is still interested, here is an extra question, perhaps just for you
How many of these England players can you identify? (The set is dated "1912".)
And so as not to spin this thread out any longer, here (under the lid) are your answers.
Don't peek before you have tried answering now!
- Spoiler:
PeterCS- Number of posts : 43743
Reputation : 104
Registration date : 2008-05-23
Flag/Background :
Re: Picture Quiz & Gallery: ~ Some Things (Never) Change ...
- Spoiler:
- Didn't do very well, I'm afraid, Peter. Got the top row ok and Spooner & Fry in the middle but then failed completely over Johnny Douglas whom I should have been able to recognise and only got Woolley and Jack Hearne on the bottom row. All together, an unsatisfactory performance. Interesting how alike Harry Dean and Tiger Smith were though.
Many thanks for your most entertaining and well-researched quiz detailing an important cricketing event of a century ago that, alas, fell victim to the English climate. Let's hope that the present doesn't replicate the past entirely and conditions improve but also that Strauss' side does manage to defeat the visiting South Africans almost as easily as Fry's team did their counterparts exactly 100 years ago.
However as L.P.Hartley says at the start of The Go-Between set in the heatwave of 1900 where a cricket match plays an important part in the plot:
The past is a foreign country. They do things differently there.
Allan D- Number of posts : 6635
Reputation : 16
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Picture Quiz & Gallery: ~ Some Things (Never) Change ...
Well, that's a fair envoi to this thread.
Myself, I was surprised how square-jawed Barnes looked in that picture, where I imagined him lean and hungry (a la Rhodes)....
Woolley and Rhodes had something in common at that point (not just a tache), though the doughty Yorkshire battler had those steely, killer eyes that make Woolley's by contrast seem kind, almost rheumy! (Soft Southerner ...)
Personally, I don't find Dean and Tiger Smith THAT similar facially. The keeper had a fleshier mouth, much bushier eyebrows, and darker, determined eyes (is that part of where his nickname came from?) .... Harry Dean looks far less striking I think, much more the hardworking Lanky factory worker about him, a bit of a potatoey face even (I said it, not thee, sithee).
I didn't get Hitch, Hearne or Foster. Douglas's early 20th century centre parting was a bit of a giveaway!
Myself, I was surprised how square-jawed Barnes looked in that picture, where I imagined him lean and hungry (a la Rhodes)....
Woolley and Rhodes had something in common at that point (not just a tache), though the doughty Yorkshire battler had those steely, killer eyes that make Woolley's by contrast seem kind, almost rheumy! (Soft Southerner ...)
Personally, I don't find Dean and Tiger Smith THAT similar facially. The keeper had a fleshier mouth, much bushier eyebrows, and darker, determined eyes (is that part of where his nickname came from?) .... Harry Dean looks far less striking I think, much more the hardworking Lanky factory worker about him, a bit of a potatoey face even (I said it, not thee, sithee).
I didn't get Hitch, Hearne or Foster. Douglas's early 20th century centre parting was a bit of a giveaway!
PeterCS- Number of posts : 43743
Reputation : 104
Registration date : 2008-05-23
Flag/Background :
Re: Picture Quiz & Gallery: ~ Some Things (Never) Change ...
Indeed, although Wally Hammond copied it between the two World Wars! You may be right about Dean and Tiger but I may have been confused by the shared cleft chin. The last survivor of that side in terms of Test cricket was, of course, the no longer moustachioed but still strikingly tall and angular Frank Woolley who, aged 47, appeared in the England side that played Australia at The Oval in 1934, the last of the pre-WWI players to do so.
Sadly for him, there was none of the heroics that had attended his appearance in the same fixture 22 years earlier. Batting at 3 Woolley was dismissed for 4 & 0 and Bob Wyatt, his captain, did not require him to bowl. The roles were very much reversed as Australia racked up 701 with both Ponsford & Bradman making double hundreds and not enforcing the follow-on despite dismissing England 380 runs behind due to the fact that the match was timeless. Nevertheless Australia still managed to defeat England by 562 runs within 4 days. A far cry from the 244-run victory England (and wollley) had experienced 22 years and a world away before after Australia had been bowled out for 65!
The youngest member of the Australian side in the 1934 match, Bill Brown, had been born during the 1912 tournament on the 3rd (and final) day of the 6th match, the 2nd Test between England and Australia at Old Trafford. Appropriately perhaps it rained and there was no play.
I had erroneously thought that Woolley was the last physical survivor of that side and of the pre-WWI England Test players generally when he passed away in Nova Scotia in the autumn of 1978 at the age of 91 but I had forgotten the Warwickshire wicketkeeper, 'Tiger' Smith who returned to the Test arena for even longer than Woolley, not as a player but as an umpire.
Indeed Smith had begun his Test umpiring duties the season before Woolley played his last Test and so could have conceivably umpired in a Test in which his former teammate played, a rare though not unknown phenomenon but they never coincided although I'm sure he had the experience on several occasions at fc level.
Smith's inaugural Test as an umpire in which he stood alongside another pre-WWI Test player, Joe Hardstaff snr, was the 2nd Test at Old Trafford at the end of July 1933 when the West Indies were the visitors and was marked by the famous occasion when the two West Indian fast bowlers, Constantine & Martindale, decided to employ bodyline tactics to the England captain, Douglas Jardine, who responded by making 127, his solitary Test century.
Smith also umpired in the Old Trafford Test when the West Indians returned in 1939 and so has the unusual distinction of both playing and umpiring in the last domestic Test series (as well as playing in the final Test series in South Africa in 1913-14 although replaced by Herbert Strudwick) before wider hostilities interrupted play for the duration.
'Tiger' passed away, aged 93, on the last day of August 1979, appropriately enough on the second day of the final Test between England and India at The Oval (the Test season had been extended into September that year due to the 2nd World Cup held earlier in the season). I remember watching his namesake and fellow Warwickshire player, M.J.K.Smith, then one of the expert commentators, deliver a handsome tribute to his former coach (although by the time M.J.K. arrived via Grace Road 'Tiger' had handed over his senior coaching role to Tom Dollery).
'Tiger' truly marks the bridge between the Edwardian Golden Age with its seemingly endless summers (although not in 1912) and rigid class distinctions to the player power of today. Here's an account of what it was like to be a professional cricketer in those dim and distant days when professionals and amateurs alike sported boaters and grew moustaches but where poverty and oblivion was but one step away:
Tarnished Gold
Sadly for him, there was none of the heroics that had attended his appearance in the same fixture 22 years earlier. Batting at 3 Woolley was dismissed for 4 & 0 and Bob Wyatt, his captain, did not require him to bowl. The roles were very much reversed as Australia racked up 701 with both Ponsford & Bradman making double hundreds and not enforcing the follow-on despite dismissing England 380 runs behind due to the fact that the match was timeless. Nevertheless Australia still managed to defeat England by 562 runs within 4 days. A far cry from the 244-run victory England (and wollley) had experienced 22 years and a world away before after Australia had been bowled out for 65!
The youngest member of the Australian side in the 1934 match, Bill Brown, had been born during the 1912 tournament on the 3rd (and final) day of the 6th match, the 2nd Test between England and Australia at Old Trafford. Appropriately perhaps it rained and there was no play.
I had erroneously thought that Woolley was the last physical survivor of that side and of the pre-WWI England Test players generally when he passed away in Nova Scotia in the autumn of 1978 at the age of 91 but I had forgotten the Warwickshire wicketkeeper, 'Tiger' Smith who returned to the Test arena for even longer than Woolley, not as a player but as an umpire.
Indeed Smith had begun his Test umpiring duties the season before Woolley played his last Test and so could have conceivably umpired in a Test in which his former teammate played, a rare though not unknown phenomenon but they never coincided although I'm sure he had the experience on several occasions at fc level.
Smith's inaugural Test as an umpire in which he stood alongside another pre-WWI Test player, Joe Hardstaff snr, was the 2nd Test at Old Trafford at the end of July 1933 when the West Indies were the visitors and was marked by the famous occasion when the two West Indian fast bowlers, Constantine & Martindale, decided to employ bodyline tactics to the England captain, Douglas Jardine, who responded by making 127, his solitary Test century.
Smith also umpired in the Old Trafford Test when the West Indians returned in 1939 and so has the unusual distinction of both playing and umpiring in the last domestic Test series (as well as playing in the final Test series in South Africa in 1913-14 although replaced by Herbert Strudwick) before wider hostilities interrupted play for the duration.
'Tiger' passed away, aged 93, on the last day of August 1979, appropriately enough on the second day of the final Test between England and India at The Oval (the Test season had been extended into September that year due to the 2nd World Cup held earlier in the season). I remember watching his namesake and fellow Warwickshire player, M.J.K.Smith, then one of the expert commentators, deliver a handsome tribute to his former coach (although by the time M.J.K. arrived via Grace Road 'Tiger' had handed over his senior coaching role to Tom Dollery).
'Tiger' truly marks the bridge between the Edwardian Golden Age with its seemingly endless summers (although not in 1912) and rigid class distinctions to the player power of today. Here's an account of what it was like to be a professional cricketer in those dim and distant days when professionals and amateurs alike sported boaters and grew moustaches but where poverty and oblivion was but one step away:
Tarnished Gold
Allan D- Number of posts : 6635
Reputation : 16
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics
» Picture Quiz / Gallery: "Batsmanship"
» "Such indecent postures" - cricket picture quiz, with art, publicity & design gallery.
» Portrait Gallery & Quiz (1-32!)
» Ha! The more things change...
» The more things change...
» "Such indecent postures" - cricket picture quiz, with art, publicity & design gallery.
» Portrait Gallery & Quiz (1-32!)
» Ha! The more things change...
» The more things change...
Page 2 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
Today at 13:18 by lardbucket
» Paris Olympics 2024
Today at 01:29 by skully
» Rugby League 2024
Yesterday at 09:48 by skully
» English Domestic Season 2024
Fri 02 Aug 2024, 18:08 by Basil
» *The United States Presidential Election * (III)
Fri 02 Aug 2024, 17:46 by Basil
» Celebrity Death List MMXXIV/The Death Thread 2024
Fri 02 Aug 2024, 08:02 by lardbucket
» In other news ....
Fri 02 Aug 2024, 07:49 by lardbucket
» Vale Horace
Wed 31 Jul 2024, 23:36 by lardbucket
» Current International One Day Cricket
Wed 31 Jul 2024, 18:34 by Basil