AFL 2017

Saints home over previously unbeaten GWS.

Did not see that coming.

unbeaten since Adelaide in Rd 1

Aye.

NM leading Adelaide, Blues leading Woods all after Saints winning last night.
Its going to be a lean tipping weekend.

still, good to see some good results...good for the saints to have two good wins on the trot and excellent to see the scum getting a beating on the 125 anniversary of amoeba formation in the pond scum (even if they are being beaten by the Filth)...Fat Eddiehead will be blowing a gasket.

FFS...now Port are crapping themselves. Looking at 0/4.

Richmond leading the dishlickers, and the Tequila Sunrises holding off Geelong (so far). The tipsters nightmare continues..

1/6

an amazing round of upsets...pretty poor from the cats and cows

0/6

Geebers. In a round of upsets can my easy beat Bloods get off the mark?

I rated them as certainties.

You should be shitting yourself* given the tipping form displayed above.

* at least a nasty rumbling in the bag

the bag is empty in preparation. I rate the Brions a fair chance....but the bloods are in the lead a quarter time

up by 44 points at half time...now the past two decades of entirely aberrant success have concluded, I have been hanging out for a result to ensure the team does not go winless through the season.

this could be the day

huzzah....bloods don't go through the season winless

About time they realised the season has started.

horace wrote:huzzah....bloods don't go through the season winless

My only tip of the round to get up. At least i won't be pants'd.

Melb....YES........no

Every match this week was won by the team lower on the ladder.

JGK wrote:Every match this week was won by the team lower on the ladder.

first time since 18 team comp started. Anyone who tipped 9 winners is a genius. Makes for an interesting season.

2/9
At least i aced the Super Rugby tipping.....along with everyone else.

I see Buckley is blaming the Scumbo loss on having to play 3 games in 13 days.

The players blame themselves and have defended Buckley (recent comments from Treloar, Adams, Pendles etc). 

Well it is a no brainer the players are defending the coach. Most of them were recruited under his watch and many get games because of the players Buckley sacked or traded- eg D Beams, H Shaw.

While I would like Buckley to be coach for life, some pundits (eg Sheahan) are saying it is not a matter of if but when he is moved on.

2/9, just hoping it's a common result.

horace wrote:I see Buckley is blaming the Scumbo loss on having to play 3 games in 13 days.

The players blame themselves and have defended Buckley (recent comments from Treloar, Adams, Pendles etc). 

Well it is a no brainer the players are defending the coach. Most of them were recruited under his watch and many get games because of the players Buckley sacked or traded- eg D Beams, H Shaw.

While I would like Buckley to be coach for life, some pundits (eg Sheahan) are saying it is not a matter of if but when he is moved on.

Beams left for personal reasons (sick dad)

the rest Buckley moved on