Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (XV)

by skully Sun 14 Apr 2019, 11:07

I see the Vomit State Pinkos are spending $1mill of tax-payers money on anti Federal Lib advertising.

Does this happen much? I can't recall it.

Pretty tough when the Fed Pinkos, State Pinkos, the Greens and Unions are all advertising against the Blues.

by Bradman Sun 14 Apr 2019, 11:18

skully wrote:I see the Vomit State Pinkos are spending $1mill of tax-payers money on anti Federal Lib advertising.

Does this happen much? I can't recall it.

Pretty tough when the Fed Pinkos, State Pinkos, the Greens and Unions are all advertising against the Blues.

It's called campaigning skulls. Deosnt work that often, I mean the banks still got stuck with a royal Commission.

by JGK Sun 14 Apr 2019, 11:33

skully wrote:I see the Vomit State Pinkos are spending $1mill of tax-payers money on anti Federal Lib advertising.

Does this happen much? I can't recall it.

Pretty tough when the Fed Pinkos, State Pinkos, the Greens and Unions are all advertising against the Blues.

If only the Tories had a guy with 9 figures who was a prominent member of parliament.

by skully Sun 14 Apr 2019, 13:49

Nasty.

by horace Sun 14 Apr 2019, 21:29

The Brownies have the Murdoch press urging them on to the punters, the Minerals Council etc... no shortage of class interest support.

by skully Sun 14 Apr 2019, 22:03

The Minerals Council???

Geez h, how many punters do you think access that info??? Laughing

by horace Sun 14 Apr 2019, 22:50

skully wrote:The Minerals Council???

Geez h, how many punters do you think access that info???

TV, newspaper and social media ads my young friend.

by Bradman Sun 14 Apr 2019, 23:50

Someone might want to explain to them which level of government controls the sale of minerals in this country before they spend to much. It might cost the ALP one seat, balanced out by Christensen thinking with his dick.

by skully Mon 15 Apr 2019, 00:14

Anywho, neither you nor Q answered my earlier question.

I said I couldn't recall a state govt previously weighing in with state taxpayer funding (as the Viles Pinkos are doing) to support their Fed counterparts during a Fed election.

Clearly I could be wrong but it seems unusual.

by Bradman Mon 15 Apr 2019, 00:41

Farknose. I can't imagine it's a first but as the Vic pinkos don't have to answer to the electorate for four years they probably don't give a rat's for convention.

by skully Mon 15 Apr 2019, 00:51

Andrews said as much.

by Bradman Mon 15 Apr 2019, 01:02

Yeah obviously a fan of Joh and Lewis.

by horace Mon 15 Apr 2019, 01:40

As ??? said. The Bjelke-P always played in that pond against the social democrats. The Chips and the NSW filth such as the Tory imitator of Spiro Agnew and his Commissioner of the Wallopers kept that filth faith.

by horace Mon 15 Apr 2019, 01:42

Apologies to Skully and Mr K. You kids were just too young...... lucky bastards!!

by Bradman Mon 15 Apr 2019, 02:27

Steady on h. Never read "Power Without Glory"? Prose wise it's atrocious, ah but the content.

by JGK Mon 15 Apr 2019, 03:43

Bradman wrote:Farknose. I can't imagine it's a first but as the Vic pinkos don't have to answer to the electorate for four years they probably don't give a rat's for convention.

The rort is that the parties maintain separate branches in each state, territory and federally because donation reporting is done on a branch by branch basis. So a mining company can donate $80k to the full suite of Liberal parties without it being disclosed. Pretty sure Howard brought that rule in and I gather the quid pro quo is that everyone pitches in to help the Feds.

by Bradman Mon 15 Apr 2019, 04:18

Campaign funding is certainly an area that needs looking at along with perks.

by horace Mon 15 Apr 2019, 05:33

Spot on. First investigation to be Downer and Woodside. Even Skully would support that.

by skully Mon 15 Apr 2019, 06:12

horace wrote:Spot on. First investigation to be Downer and Woodside. Even Skully would support that.

I wouldn't support it on the grounds that I'm rigor mortis bored with you repeating it ad nauseum, h.

by horace Mon 15 Apr 2019, 22:59

skully wrote:
horace wrote:Spot on. First investigation to be Downer and Woodside. Even Skully would support that.

I wouldn't support it on the grounds that I'm rigor mortis bored with you repeating it ad nauseum, h.

Well besides that! It is the most spectacular example but I expect there will be plenty of others from the Browns and Radishes who'd be worth investigating.

by JGK Tue 16 Apr 2019, 04:30

Did anyone here watch Q&A last night.

Billy Tory Senator James McGrath accomplished the extraordinary feat of making Malcolm Roberts seems reasonable.

by horace Tue 16 Apr 2019, 07:08

JGK wrote:Did anyone here watch Q&A last night.

Billy Tory Senator James McGrath accomplished the extraordinary feat of making Malcolm Roberts seems reasonable.

Good grief. I can no longer watch QnA. There is only so much squirming you can do at the churning foibles of humanity. WTF is the ABC doing giving oxygen to scumboids fascists like Roberts? I spose they call that balance

by Bradman Tue 16 Apr 2019, 08:46

In their charter apparently. Going stupid charter.

by skully Tue 16 Apr 2019, 09:48

horace wrote:Good grief. I can no longer watch QnA.

Crikey, I reached that milestone when the Vulture was our PM. The ticky across the bottom was supposed to be texts being received but clearly the pinko ABC staffer uploading them dumped all the negative ones and only put up glowing praise of Gillard. I said "that'll do me".

by Big Dog Wed 17 Apr 2019, 08:34

So its official. Sanctimonious self righteous minorities & the age of offense control this country.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-04-16/barry-humphries-name-dropped-from-prestigious-micf-award/11018726

I have & will happily pay to see Humphries on stage but i've never even heard of these other numpties. I guess this is the only way they can get a headline.

by Sponsored content