Flaming Bails
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

World's Most Off Topic Cricket Forum


And he looks no worse than Murali . . .

+3
Fred Nerk
skully
tac
7 posters

Flaming Bails :: Flaming Bails ::  The Flaming Bails Cricket Forum

Go down

And he looks no worse than Murali . . . Empty And he looks no worse than Murali . . .

Post by tac Mon 25 Feb 2008, 10:48

Samuels was found to straighten by an average of 27 degrees when bowling off-breaks, and by approximately 35 degrees with his faster deliveries.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/7186180.stm
tac
tac


Number of posts : 19270
Reputation : 24
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : pon

Back to top Go down

And he looks no worse than Murali . . . Empty Re: And he looks no worse than Murali . . .

Post by skully Mon 25 Feb 2008, 10:50

Ban the farker, as long as Chuck is allowed to keep playing. Seems to be sacrificial game that the ICC likes to play.
skully
skully


Number of posts : 106779
Age : 113
Reputation : 247
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

And he looks no worse than Murali . . . Empty Re: And he looks no worse than Murali . . .

Post by Fred Nerk Mon 25 Feb 2008, 10:52

Yeah, that sort of bowling action should be Muralied out of the game.

Fred Nerk


Number of posts : 9008
Reputation : 40
Registration date : 2007-10-15
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

And he looks no worse than Murali . . . Empty Re: And he looks no worse than Murali . . .

Post by embee Mon 25 Feb 2008, 11:34

7 wickets at 127 in Tests ....It should be mandatory that he 'bowls' in every game .....
embee
embee


Number of posts : 26339
Age : 57
Reputation : 263
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background : aus

Back to top Go down

And he looks no worse than Murali . . . Empty Re: And he looks no worse than Murali . . .

Post by JKLever Mon 25 Feb 2008, 11:51

Would be very funny if someone took the ICC to court using the 'murali defence'
JKLever
JKLever


Number of posts : 27236
Reputation : 153
Registration date : 2007-08-06
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

And he looks no worse than Murali . . . Empty Re: And he looks no worse than Murali . . .

Post by Guest Mon 25 Feb 2008, 21:57

JKLever wrote:Would be very funny if someone took the ICC to court using the 'murali defence'

THIS DOES NOT MAKE SENSE!!!!

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

And he looks no worse than Murali . . . Empty Re: And he looks no worse than Murali . . .

Post by HH_pink Mon 25 Feb 2008, 22:01

Rob I wrote:
JKLever wrote:Would be very funny if someone took the ICC to court using the 'murali defence'

THIS DOES NOT MAKE SENSE!!!!

Then maybe you should get yourself a better lens ...
But mind you, not one that follows the principles of Huygens ...
HH_pink
HH_pink

And he looks no worse than Murali . . . APSeEpm

Number of posts : 3353
Reputation : 3
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

And he looks no worse than Murali . . . Empty Re: And he looks no worse than Murali . . .

Post by Zat Mon 25 Feb 2008, 22:07

Independent analysis of Samuels' bowling was performed by Dr Mark King at the National Cricket Academy at Loughborough University.
Silly bugger should have gone to the Uni of WA where they clear eveybody.

Zat


Number of posts : 28872
Reputation : 86
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

And he looks no worse than Murali . . . Empty Re: And he looks no worse than Murali . . .

Post by Guest Mon 25 Feb 2008, 22:20

HH_pink wrote:
Rob I wrote:
JKLever wrote:Would be very funny if someone took the ICC to court using the 'murali defence'

THIS DOES NOT MAKE SENSE!!!!

Then maybe you should get yourself a better lens ...

Maybe you should watch South Park, then you will 'get' the reference.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

And he looks no worse than Murali . . . Empty Re: And he looks no worse than Murali . . .

Post by HH_pink Mon 25 Feb 2008, 22:23

Rob I wrote:
HH_pink wrote:
Rob I wrote:
JKLever wrote:Would be very funny if someone took the ICC to court using the 'murali defence'

THIS DOES NOT MAKE SENSE!!!!

Then maybe you should get yourself a better lens ...

Maybe you should watch South Park, then you will 'get' the reference.

Maybe I do, and maybe I did. What's that got to do with what I posted? scratch
HH_pink
HH_pink

And he looks no worse than Murali . . . APSeEpm

Number of posts : 3353
Reputation : 3
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

And he looks no worse than Murali . . . Empty Re: And he looks no worse than Murali . . .

Post by Zat Mon 25 Feb 2008, 22:27

HH_pink wrote:
Rob I wrote:
HH_pink wrote:
Rob I wrote:
JKLever wrote:Would be very funny if someone took the ICC to court using the 'murali defence'

THIS DOES NOT MAKE SENSE!!!!

Then maybe you should get yourself a better lens ...

Maybe you should watch South Park, then you will 'get' the reference.

Maybe I do, and maybe I did. What's that got to do with what I posted? scratch
Oh dear... Better get a lwayer before an OJ Simpson-trial-like argument breaks out...

Zat


Number of posts : 28872
Reputation : 86
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

And he looks no worse than Murali . . . Empty Re: And he looks no worse than Murali . . .

Post by HH_pink Mon 25 Feb 2008, 22:29

Zat wrote:
HH_pink wrote:
Rob I wrote:
HH_pink wrote:
Rob I wrote:
JKLever wrote:Would be very funny if someone took the ICC to court using the 'murali defence'

THIS DOES NOT MAKE SENSE!!!!

Then maybe you should get yourself a better lens ...

Maybe you should watch South Park, then you will 'get' the reference.

Maybe I do, and maybe I did. What's that got to do with what I posted? scratch
Oh dear... Better get a lwayer before an OJ Simpson-trial-like argument breaks out...

Why can't an argument like that break out?
HH_pink
HH_pink

And he looks no worse than Murali . . . APSeEpm

Number of posts : 3353
Reputation : 3
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

And he looks no worse than Murali . . . Empty Re: And he looks no worse than Murali . . .

Post by Zat Mon 25 Feb 2008, 22:29

HH_pink wrote:
Zat wrote:
HH_pink wrote:
Rob I wrote:
HH_pink wrote:
Rob I wrote:
JKLever wrote:Would be very funny if someone took the ICC to court using the 'murali defence'

THIS DOES NOT MAKE SENSE!!!!

Then maybe you should get yourself a better lens ...

Maybe you should watch South Park, then you will 'get' the reference.

Maybe I do, and maybe I did. What's that got to do with what I posted? scratch
Oh dear... Better get a lwayer before an OJ Simpson-trial-like argument breaks out...

Why can't an argument like that break out?
suicide

Zat


Number of posts : 28872
Reputation : 86
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

And he looks no worse than Murali . . . Empty Re: And he looks no worse than Murali . . .

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

Flaming Bails :: Flaming Bails ::  The Flaming Bails Cricket Forum

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum