Indian and Pakistani forummers . . .

Batman wrote:

Demelza wrote:You really are a farking joke....in fact I'd say you're even funnier than Batty!

Where the hell did I come in into this?

Demelza wrote: Anyway, let's take you back a little while......can you remember who it was that first started sharing emails???

Lemme guess? You and Nigel. No wait, it was you sharing Nigel's e-mails with Jack, wasn't it?

Lissen, give Jack all the rub you feel like givin' but leave me the hell outta this. I don't want nothin' to do with your twosomes or threesomes......

Oh Batty, please keep up!

Eowyn is upset because I showed tac the email that she sent Nigel, admitting that Nigel NEVER sent her abusive mails.

Tac was having great fun posting very private things about Nigel all over the forum, so I retaliated by saying that I could easily post very private things all over the forum about someone he cares about.

Anyway, eowyn has had a go at tac and told him he's not allowed to play this morning.
Isn't that sweet?

*Buckaroo* wrote:

taipan wrote:

*Buckaroo* wrote:let's say the child is interested in becoming a politician or a bureaucrat ..

Barack Obama?

well.. that's just now.

And he's also a token

So Hilary is having her ass whipped by a token.

Nice

lardbucket wrote:OK Buck, so you know lots of mixed-culture families with problems. I know a few, too, but I know even more single-culture families with problems, as well as a good number of mixed-culture families with no problems whatsoever.

you know families are big support-structures for an individual.

Except in a disfunctional society.

Now if the union isn't accepted by the larger family, then that is a major disadvantage for the child going through to later years esp because the times that we live in are so tumultuous/volatile.

Demelza wrote:

Batman wrote:

Demelza wrote:You really are a farking joke....in fact I'd say you're even funnier than Batty!

Where the hell did I come in into this?

Demelza wrote: Anyway, let's take you back a little while......can you remember who it was that first started sharing emails???

Lemme guess? You and Nigel. No wait, it was you sharing Nigel's e-mails with Jack, wasn't it?

Lissen, give Jack all the rub you feel like givin' but leave me the hell outta this. I don't want nothin' to do with your twosomes or threesomes......

Oh Batty, please keep up!

Eowyn is upset because I showed tac the email that she sent Nigel, admitting that Nigel NEVER sent her abusive mails.

Tac was having great fun posting very private things about Nigel all over the forum, so I retaliated by saying that I could easily post very private things all over the forum about someone he cares about.


Anyway, eowyn has had a go at tac and told him he's not allowed to play this morning.
Isn't that sweet?

And so are the Days of our Lives . . . .

that it's pretty tough for both sons and daughters

IMO its tougher for daughters to get their family's acceptance than sons who're still forgiven in most of the cases.

tac wrote:Yeah, I would have expected that the daughters are treated far more strictly than the sons. But it seems from what my mate was saying (supported by SG) that it's pretty tough for both sons and daughters

Yeah deffo, I was just saying that from what I've seen - which is a reasonable amount - both sexes 'have fun' but the ones that seem to get caught up with is the women. Damn I need to perk some Brasian women.

Demelza wrote:

Batman wrote:

Demelza wrote:You really are a farking joke....in fact I'd say you're even funnier than Batty!

Where the hell did I come in into this?

Demelza wrote: Anyway, let's take you back a little while......can you remember who it was that first started sharing emails???

Lemme guess? You and Nigel. No wait, it was you sharing Nigel's e-mails with Jack, wasn't it?

Lissen, give Jack all the rub you feel like givin' but leave me the hell outta this. I don't want nothin' to do with your twosomes or threesomes......

Oh Batty, please keep up!

Eowyn is upset because I showed tac the email that she sent Nigel, admitting that Nigel NEVER sent her abusive mails.

Tac was having great fun posting very private things about Nigel all over the forum, so I retaliated by saying that I could easily post very private things all over the forum about someone he cares about.

Anyway, eowyn has had a go at tac and told him he's not allowed to play this morning.
Isn't that sweet?

why don't you forward me some of these exciting emails ?

*Buckaroo* wrote:

lardbucket wrote:OK Buck, so you know lots of mixed-culture families with problems. I know a few, too, but I know even more single-culture families with problems, as well as a good number of mixed-culture families with no problems whatsoever.

you know families are big support-structures for an individual.

Except in a disfunctional society.

Now if the union isn't accepted by the larger family, then that is a major disadvantage for the child going through to later years esp because the times that we live in are so tumultuous/volatile.

You seem to favour theoretical problems over practical success.

SG wrote:

that it's pretty tough for both sons and daughters

IMO its tougher for daughters to get their family's acceptance than sons who're still forgiven in most of the cases.

Of course, but I was saying that it's not without problems for sons . . .

lardbucket wrote:Aye, stick to your onesomes, Batty.

Meh. There is no such thing as forum one somes. Not when people claim it's shit and not worth 0.01% attention span and yet keep coming back to lick every single word of it.....

lardbucket wrote:

*Buckaroo* wrote:

lardbucket wrote:OK Buck, so you know lots of mixed-culture families with problems. I know a few, too, but I know even more single-culture families with problems, as well as a good number of mixed-culture families with no problems whatsoever.

you know families are big support-structures for an individual.

Except in a disfunctional society.

Now if the union isn't accepted by the larger family, then that is a major disadvantage for the child going through to later years esp because the times that we live in are so tumultuous/volatile.

You seem to favour theoretical problems over practical success.

I think he's trying to tell us something, lardy . . . .

Bucky, spill the beans on your mixed heritage, it will be a load off your chest, mate.

lardbucket wrote:

*Buckaroo* wrote:

lardbucket wrote:OK Buck, so you know lots of mixed-culture families with problems. I know a few, too, but I know even more single-culture families with problems, as well as a good number of mixed-culture families with no problems whatsoever.

you know families are big support-structures for an individual.

Except in a disfunctional society.

Now if the union isn't accepted by the larger family, then that is a major disadvantage for the child going through to later years esp because the times that we live in are so tumultuous/volatile.

You seem to favour theoretical problems over practical success.

I just want to eliminate the risks.

the child should not grow up with any dissonance.

Demelza wrote:
Oh Batty, please keep.... zzzzz
.
.

.
.
zzzzzz
.
....tac and told him he's not allowed to play this morning.
Isn't that sweet?

What would be sweet would be if you just f*cked off. Y'know, just f*cked off and didn't say another banal word on this thread and let people with a mental age greater than 13 get on with it.

tac wrote:

lardbucket wrote:

*Buckaroo* wrote:

lardbucket wrote:OK Buck, so you know lots of mixed-culture families with problems. I know a few, too, but I know even more single-culture families with problems, as well as a good number of mixed-culture families with no problems whatsoever.

you know families are big support-structures for an individual.

Except in a disfunctional society.

Now if the union isn't accepted by the larger family, then that is a major disadvantage for the child going through to later years esp because the times that we live in are so tumultuous/volatile.

You seem to favour theoretical problems over practical success.

I think he's trying to tell us something, lardy . . . .

Bucky, spill the beans on your mixed heritage, it will be a load off your chest, mate.

He's Barack Obama?

tac wrote:I think he's trying to tell us something, lardy . . . .

Bucky, spill the beans on your mixed heritage, it will be a load off your chest, mate.

actually someone from my own family once called me a mixed-race because one of my parents was Jacobite and the other was Orthodox.

Batman wrote:

lardbucket wrote:Aye, stick to your onesomes, Batty.

Meh. There is no such thing as forum one somes. Not when people claim it's shit and not worth 0.01% attention span and yet keep coming back to lick every single word of it.....

I'm sure you have a point, and one day you'll make it without a half page of filibustering and the attachment of 2-3 inane, unrelated, and irrelevant gremlins. One day you'll put the laughing icon next to something funny.

Depends on the family. Some don't bat an eye-lid, some tend to be control freaks.

lardbucket wrote:I'm sure you have a point, and one day you'll make it without a half page of filibustering and the attachment of 2-3 inane, unrelated, and irrelevant gremlins. One day you'll put the laughing icon next to something funny.

Kerching, son, ker-fookin-ching.

lardbucket wrote:

Batman wrote:

lardbucket wrote:Aye, stick to your onesomes, Batty.

Meh. There is no such thing as forum one somes. Not when people claim it's shit and not worth 0.01% attention span and yet keep coming back to lick every single word of it.....

I'm sure you have a point, and one day you'll make it without a half page of filibustering and the attachment of 2-3 inane, unrelated, and irrelevant gremlins. One day you'll put the laughing icon next to something funny.

Call it wish fulfilling. Besides that, I firmly believe in dealing with people in the language that they understand the most. People shouldn't be dishing out what they won't take back and I certainly am not the last person here dishing out or taking some back either.

Demelza wrote:

Batman wrote:

Demelza wrote:You really are a farking joke....in fact I'd say you're even funnier than Batty!

Where the hell did I come in into this?

Demelza wrote: Anyway, let's take you back a little while......can you remember who it was that first started sharing emails???

Lemme guess? You and Nigel. No wait, it was you sharing Nigel's e-mails with Jack, wasn't it?

Lissen, give Jack all the rub you feel like givin' but leave me the hell outta this. I don't want nothin' to do with your twosomes or threesomes......

Oh Batty, please keep up!

Eowyn is upset because I showed tac the email that she sent Nigel, admitting that Nigel NEVER sent her abusive mails.

Tac was having great fun posting very private things about Nigel all over the forum, so I retaliated by saying that I could easily post very private things all over the forum about someone he cares about.

Anyway, eowyn has had a go at tac and told him he's not allowed to play this morning.
Isn't that sweet?

How the hell do I keep up if you are showing those e-mails to Jack all the time?

Also lemme get this straight - Ange e-mailed Taipan and you shared Ange's mails to Taipan with Jack and are asking Jack who started sharing private messages on the forum first. No wonder I hate soap operas.

FFS feels like batting to Kumble on a 5th day crumbling wicket.

All I can say is You all deserve each other.

Batman wrote:Call it wish fulfilling. Besides that, I firmly believe in dealing with people in the language that they understand the most.

Well as you clearly have problems with English.....

Batman wrote:

How the hell do I keep up if you are showing those e-mails to Jack all the time?

Also lemme get this straight - Ange e-mailed Taipan and you shared Ange's mails to Taipan with Jack and are asking Jack who started sharing private messages on the forum first. No wonder I hate soap operas.

FFS feels like batting to Kumble on a 5th day crumbling wicket.

All I can say is You all deserve each other.

No, I'm asking who started sharing emails.
I'll tell you the answer.......It was EOWYN

Batman wrote:There is no such thing as forum one somes.

I dunno. Trev and Anni seem to post a lot of threads that nobody replies to.

Demelza wrote:
No, I'm asking who started sharing emails.
I'll tell you the answer.......It was EOWYN

DUM-DUM-DUMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

Jebus, there is just no keeping the shoitefests out of any threads these days.