WI v Australia, 2nd Test, North Sound, 30th May-3rd June

taipan wrote:
Some might call this bandwagon jumping

TBH, I think he's got me on that 'alert when a new post' thing.

Because he's a grudgy little cockmuncher who hasn't been able to hack my apt summation of his pitiful life.

taipan wrote:

tac wrote:Nice s, Dannyboy . . . back on filo strategy, eh?

Some might call this bandwagon jumping

Oh, the irony . . . . .

tac wrote:You just need to read back through any thread you infest to give lie to that assertion.

It looks more like you were trying to paste over a few cracks in that fragile ego of yours . . .

Fragile ego says the man who has to get his cyber-cock out at any opportunity and one who feels so shit about himself that he has to try and denigrate anyone he can and hopefully they'll leave the forum. Eh?

Brass Monkey wrote:

taipan wrote:
Some might call this bandwagon jumping

TBH, I think he's got me on that 'alert when a new post' thing.

Because he's a grudgy little cockmuncher who hasn't been able to hack my apt summation of his pitiful life.

Can't hack it? I love it . . . every time you bring it up it confirms your inability to cope with someone who doesn't accept the "hardman" persona you want ever so much to portray.

tac wrote:

taipan wrote:

tac wrote:Nice s, Dannyboy . . . back on filo strategy, eh?

Some might call this bandwagon jumping

Oh, the irony . . . . .

yep, that's what I thought after all your sooking about it last week.

tac wrote:Can't hack it? I love it . . . every time you bring it up it confirms your inability to cope with someone who doesn't accept the "hardman" persona you want ever so much to portray.

Not at all. I do dislike it, but the only reason is this:

You're, IMO, incredibly poor at hiding how you're really doing, you start flailing around, repeating yourself, being falsely nice to some people amidst it all - like some weird and moribund 'love campaign' - it gets boring, but not only that - it gives you more 'human' attention, when really I want you to wallow in the lonely mire that is your life.

I CGAF if anyone thinks I'm hard. We're on the internet. You, however, seem to think that it's still the way you should act. Weird.

Brass Monkey wrote:

tac wrote:You just need to read back through any thread you infest to give lie to that assertion.

It looks more like you were trying to paste over a few cracks in that fragile ego of yours . . .

Fragile ego says the man who has to get his cyber-cock out at any opportunity and one who feels so shit about himself that he has to try and denigrate anyone he can and hopefully they'll leave the forum. Eh?

Again, just read back through almost any thread and watch Dannyboy reach around in his pants looking for his cyber-cock . . . "oh, someone doesn't agree with me . . . cockmuncher" .

How about the fragile ego of someone who gets all righteous on the forum when questioned about his abuse, but then slinks off and sends the apology by PM. Public abuse followed private apology to hide his damaged ego . . .

Brass Monkey wrote:

tac wrote:Can't hack it? I love it . . . every time you bring it up it confirms your inability to cope with someone who doesn't accept the "hardman" persona you want ever so much to portray.

Not at all. I do dislike it, but the only reason is this:

You're, IMO, incredibly poor at hiding how you're really doing, you start flailing around, repeating yourself, being falsely nice to some people amidst it all - like some weird and moribund 'love campaign' - it gets boring, but not only that - it gives you more 'human' attention, when really I want you to wallow in the lonely mire that is your life.

I CGAF if anyone thinks I'm hard. We're on the internet. You, however, seem to think that it's still the way you should act. Weird.

Indeed, Danny, we're on an internet forum . . . . but you still can't let anything go in case someone might think less of you . . . never seen a man so obsessed with his own image . . . cyber-narcissism

This never grows old.

Dannyboy, I leave you the last word . . . time for dinner.

tac wrote:Again, just read back through almost any thread and watch Dannyboy reach around in his pants looking for his cyber-cock . . . "oh, someone doesn't agree with me . . . cockmuncher" .

How about the fragile ego of someone who gets all righteous on the forum when questioned about his abuse, but then slinks off and sends the apology by PM. Public abuse followed private apology to hide his damaged ego . . .

Not at all. I treat people in kind. Hence my stance with you.

As for apologising to skully, he's a good bloke and when you were a massive drama queen because you poorly tried to defend your shitty actions I thought I'd mortally offended him. Happened that I didn't and that it was all more tac underhand bullshit - like the weak little qunt he is.

tac wrote:
Indeed, Danny, we're on an internet forum . . . . but you still can't let anything go in case someone might think less of you . . . never seen a man so obsessed with his own image . . . cyber-narcissism

Yeah reet. I'm one of the most 'open' people on here - if they think better or worse of me, it's not my fault. People can think what they like.

tac wrote:

Brass Monkey wrote:

tac wrote:Can't hack it? I love it . . . every time you bring it up it confirms your inability to cope with someone who doesn't accept the "hardman" persona you want ever so much to portray.

Not at all. I do dislike it, but the only reason is this:

You're, IMO, incredibly poor at hiding how you're really doing, you start flailing around, repeating yourself, being falsely nice to some people amidst it all - like some weird and moribund 'love campaign' - it gets boring, but not only that - it gives you more 'human' attention, when really I want you to wallow in the lonely mire that is your life.

I CGAF if anyone thinks I'm hard. We're on the internet. You, however, seem to think that it's still the way you should act. Weird.

Indeed, Danny, we're on an internet forum . . . . but you still can't let anything go in case someone might think less of you . . . never seen a man so obsessed with his own image . . . cyber-narcissism

High Ferric Content in this Post ....

embee wrote:

tac wrote:

Brass Monkey wrote:

tac wrote:Can't hack it? I love it . . . every time you bring it up it confirms your inability to cope with someone who doesn't accept the "hardman" persona you want ever so much to portray.

Not at all. I do dislike it, but the only reason is this:

You're, IMO, incredibly poor at hiding how you're really doing, you start flailing around, repeating yourself, being falsely nice to some people amidst it all - like some weird and moribund 'love campaign' - it gets boring, but not only that - it gives you more 'human' attention, when really I want you to wallow in the lonely mire that is your life.

I CGAF if anyone thinks I'm hard. We're on the internet. You, however, seem to think that it's still the way you should act. Weird.

Indeed, Danny, we're on an internet forum . . . . but you still can't let anything go in case someone might think less of you . . . never seen a man so obsessed with his own image . . . cyber-narcissism

High Ferric Content in this Post ....

Now get off the bandwagon.

I did think that myself. But aye, it's strange we're all in agreeance.

So who won the latest arguments?

Zat wrote:So who won the latest arguments?

According to Jack, he 'pwns' me all the time and I never 'win'. Not only that, I don't get any 'points' either. I'm not too bovoired personally.

BTW, where do you get those pics from - they're always hilarious.

Brass Monkey wrote:

Zat wrote:So who won the latest arguments?

According to Jack, he 'pwns' me all the time and I never 'win'. Not only that, I don't get any 'points' either. I'm not too bovoired personally.

BTW, where do you get those pics from - they're always hilarious.

How about this one then?
There's lots of them around on the Internet, you just have to save them when you find them.

Maybe I should do a 'funny pictures' thread, but that'd kinda spoil the surprise element.

Zat wrote:
There's lots of them around on the Internet, you just have to save them when you find them.

Maybe I should do a 'funny pictures' thread, but that'd kinda spoil the surprise element.

Yeah, quality. I don't think you should start a thread for them though, as you say, better to reel them out when appropriate.

Yeah, the unexpected always makes it worthwhile. Gotta go, need some z's before play starts.

Noice.

Take it easy.

Yeah! Futurama!

embee wrote:

tac wrote:

Brass Monkey wrote:

tac wrote:Can't hack it? I love it . . . every time you bring it up it confirms your inability to cope with someone who doesn't accept the "hardman" persona you want ever so much to portray.

Not at all. I do dislike it, but the only reason is this:

You're, IMO, incredibly poor at hiding how you're really doing, you start flailing around, repeating yourself, being falsely nice to some people amidst it all - like some weird and moribund 'love campaign' - it gets boring, but not only that - it gives you more 'human' attention, when really I want you to wallow in the lonely mire that is your life.

I CGAF if anyone thinks I'm hard. We're on the internet. You, however, seem to think that it's still the way you should act. Weird.

Indeed, Danny, we're on an internet forum . . . . but you still can't let anything go in case someone might think less of you . . . never seen a man so obsessed with his own image . . . cyber-narcissism

High Ferric Content in this Post ....

It goes around and around ... a ferrous wheel

lardbucket wrote:

embee wrote:

tac wrote:

Brass Monkey wrote:

tac wrote:Can't hack it? I love it . . . every time you bring it up it confirms your inability to cope with someone who doesn't accept the "hardman" persona you want ever so much to portray.

Not at all. I do dislike it, but the only reason is this:

You're, IMO, incredibly poor at hiding how you're really doing, you start flailing around, repeating yourself, being falsely nice to some people amidst it all - like some weird and moribund 'love campaign' - it gets boring, but not only that - it gives you more 'human' attention, when really I want you to wallow in the lonely mire that is your life.

I CGAF if anyone thinks I'm hard. We're on the internet. You, however, seem to think that it's still the way you should act. Weird.

Indeed, Danny, we're on an internet forum . . . . but you still can't let anything go in case someone might think less of you . . . never seen a man so obsessed with his own image . . . cyber-narcissism

High Ferric Content in this Post ....

It goes around and around ... a ferrous wheel

Well that's one in the eye.

I've clearly misjudged this Futurama thing...