Re: Australia v South Africa, 1st T20, Melbourne, Jan 11

by taipan Sun 11 Jan 2009, 08:27

So who is actually going to watch?

'Fess up.

by Henry Sun 11 Jan 2009, 08:31

Big night for Herschelle you'd imagine. Big night for him tonight as well......

by Henry Sun 11 Jan 2009, 08:53

"Tsotsobe's bowling pies"

"The lates betfair betting odds are in..."

God Channel Nine is tacky these days.

by Henry Sun 11 Jan 2009, 09:00

Stop yelling at me Mark Taylor.

by Zat Sun 11 Jan 2009, 09:02

Well, Warner can hit a ball hard, but even in baseball you don't see anyone hit four home runs in 19 pitches.

by Guest Sun 11 Jan 2009, 09:13

Is the Warner the guy who's been using the double sided bat?

by Guest Sun 11 Jan 2009, 09:15

Forget that . . . they just said so on TV.

by Basil Sun 11 Jan 2009, 09:24

This bloke Warner has got tremendous bat speed.

by Guest Sun 11 Jan 2009, 09:24

Why won't they bowl yorkers?

by Zat Sun 11 Jan 2009, 09:26

Alby Morkel bowled ine, and got a dot ball for it...

by Guest Sun 11 Jan 2009, 09:37

They describe Gibbs as a mozzie cos he buzzes Laughing

by Basil Sun 11 Jan 2009, 09:39

Demelza wrote:They describe Gibbs as a mozzie cos he buzzes

As opposed to a fish because he drinks like one?

by WideWally Sun 11 Jan 2009, 09:39

Zat wrote:An event that will be filed under BFW, possibly before it starts.

Be Farkin' Warnered?

by Zat Sun 11 Jan 2009, 09:42

God, Mark Nicholas still sounds like he wants to get into the players' pants. Or worse.

by Guest Sun 11 Jan 2009, 09:43

He's (Warner) got one of those awful tufts of hair under his bottom lip. I hate that with a passion. Is there a name for that?

by JGK Sun 11 Jan 2009, 09:45

Demelza wrote:He's (Warner) got one of those awful tufts of hair under his bottom lip. I hate that with a passion. Is there a name for that?

Crumb catcher.

by JGK Sun 11 Jan 2009, 09:46

BTW, this match is proving my theory that you need really quick (and full) bowlers or you need accurate spinners in JAMOTTIs.

by Basil Sun 11 Jan 2009, 09:48

JGK wrote:BTW, this match is proving my theory that you need really quick (and full) bowlers or you need accurate spinners in JAMOTTIs.

That'll be why Oz have picked Tait and YT then ? Wink

by freddled gruntbuggly Sun 11 Jan 2009, 09:51

Basil wrote:
JGK wrote:BTW, this match is proving my theory that you need really quick (and full) bowlers or you need accurate spinners in JAMOTTIs.
That'll be why Oz have picked Tait and YT then ?

No, we did that because we really don't GAFF about T20s.

by Guest Sun 11 Jan 2009, 09:57

200 looks a bit out of reach now.

by Basil Sun 11 Jan 2009, 09:59

freddled gruntbuggly wrote:
Basil wrote:
JGK wrote:BTW, this match is proving my theory that you need really quick (and full) bowlers or you need accurate spinners in JAMOTTIs.
That'll be why Oz have picked Tait and YT then ?
No, we did that because we really don't GAFF about T20s.

Apart from the 60k in the ground then?

by Henry Sun 11 Jan 2009, 09:59

JGK wrote:
Demelza wrote:He's (Warner) got one of those awful tufts of hair under his bottom lip. I hate that with a passion. Is there a name for that?

Crumb catcher.

Clit tickler.