Graceless, whingeing, arrogant Aussie no. 4027

Sook.

doctorspin wrote:

Zat wrote:Careful on the Q's ds. There's been a bit of discussion about them recently.

Yeh, I know, well FARK THAT for a game of soldiers. If you can't call a QUNT like Martyn A QUNT...well what is the point of The Paradise that is DELLOLAND!!!!!????

I wonder if Jay has any doubts about the borderline racist, misogynist, swearing-filled women-free club that this place has become?

Rob I wrote:

doctorspin wrote:

Zat wrote:Careful on the Q's ds. There's been a bit of discussion about them recently.

Yeh, I know, well FARK THAT for a game of soldiers. If you can't call a QUNT like Martyn A QUNT...well what is the point of The Paradise that is DELLOLAND!!!!!????

I wonder if Jay has any doubts about the borderline racist, misogynist, swearing-filled women-free club that this place has become?

That confirms it.

Red isn't a woman.

And exactly which women are we supposed to have chased away?

Gabba Dan

So Woody chased GD. Who did you chase Skulls?

I find the whole idea of being "chased" off this forum lame in the extreme. The very reason someone has posted anything combative to anyone is because that first person posted something provocative, inflammatory, insulting, arrogant or stoopid in the first place. It's a forum. Forums beget responses.

If you are gonna do that, then please have the thick skin to be able to cop a suitable response. To flounce off in a huff is ironic at best and super-childish and super-weak at worst.

And all this talk of people being "hounded" is laughable. What is this, a convent? If it is, then surely Rob I is the pastor.

Well to the best of my knowledge I cannot think of one women who has left because of the "language".

And the misogynist charge is even more laughable.

Indeed.

taipan wrote:Well to the best of my knowledge I cannot think of one women who has left because of the "language".

.

How do you know it is not the basis of LLL's disappearance?

taipan wrote:

And the misogynist charge is even more laughable.

How so? You don't find the word for female genitalia expressed as an insult ad infinitum to be misogynistic?

ad infinitum

Boring sums it up best.

skully wrote:The very reason someone has posted anything combative to anyone is because that first person posted something provocative, inflammatory, insulting, arrogant or stoopid in the first place.

But skulls, just because someone turns into a donkey and starts braying, we don't have to turn into herd of donkeys and bray back. You can expose their provocative, inflammatory insults with clever debate and make them look arrogant / stupid that way.

the forum has become a blokes and spivs only club - Mudge's dream result...
'

Erm, that's the way it starts, Rob, but eventually that donkey makes such idiotic remarks that one is left with little choice but to bring to their atention their donkeyness. Only one poster has flounced off after any effort on my part (along with quite a few others who were equally gobsmacked at just what a lying donkey this individual was).

Sue me, but damn it was satisfying. It's fair to say that particular person had a history and actually flounced 3 times.

I have been subjected to plenty of vitriol and have learned that the best responses are either clever reposte, a "meh" or a "I hate you guys".

But to start threads specifically aimed at a so called "group" and not expect a response, either clever, vitriolic, insulting, abusive or otherwise on a forum that follows in a long line of vitriolic forums, is a joke.

You handle it your way, Rob, and let other handle it theirs. Else one might appear a bit of a preacher.

horace wrote:the forum has become a blokes and spivs only club - Mudge's dream result...
'

Hehehe, coming from one of the biggest baiters in the joint. Nice one, h.

S...surprised that after all these years that you misunderstand me so...baiting indeed!!!....I admit to engaging in a little gentle teasing now and then.

Yes, I'm affronted by the language on this forum. I'm a lady!!!

Exactly which women have left? Looks like most of them still occasionally post.

Cheers Dem. Thought the joint was going soft on me.

The Q word is definitely getting a bit old though but its fair to say far too much mincing going on in this forum over nothing recently.

How about swapping the 'q' word for the 'k' word?

JKLever wrote:The Q word is definitely getting a bit old though but its fair to say far too much mincing going on in this forum over nothing recently.

Blimey, I actually agree with ol' Leve here !

But yeah, as Willie once put it - Much Ado About Nothing

I apologise to the Aussie bretheren on here if they don't understand Willie's nuances -
so, to translate it into Aus-speak it simply means ...** adopting a nasal drawl ** ....

"Fark off you sookin' qunts"

Rob I wrote:

taipan wrote:

And the misogynist charge is even more laughable.

How so? You don't find the word for female genitalia expressed as an insult ad infinitum to be misogynistic?

FFS, prick etc are used as well. Does that make us all homophobic?

Waiting for your answer on which ladies have been chased.

Is there still a problem with swearing on the forum?