Murali reckons Harbhajan can beat his Test record

by DJ_Smerk Wed 07 Jul 2010, 20:33

Muttiah Muralitharan has singled out Harbhajan Singh as the only bowler capable of emulating his record feat in Tests. Murali, the leading wicket-taker in Tests and ODIs, who will retire from the longest format later this month, also said the decline of Tests and 50-over cricket meant slow bowlers would struggle for survival.

Link

Murali rubbing it in Australia's face in regards to the Test wicket taking record. Sorry, Harbhajan Singh?

SORRY - did he just say, who I think he said?

Jesus, the man's been out of form since 2001. Muralitharan in full troll mode. I wonder how the Aussie media will respond to this.

by Basil Thu 08 Jul 2010, 01:23

Why not - takes a chucker to recognise a fellow chucker

by skully Thu 08 Jul 2010, 07:01

Chuck is a bitter little man because he knows many won't properly acknowledge his "record" due to his highly dubious action. He's an embarrassment to the rich history of the game and will always be seen as a pariah.

by The One Thu 08 Jul 2010, 07:41

skully wrote:Chuck is a bitter little man

sounds more like his detractors

by skully Thu 08 Jul 2010, 07:42

How'd Germany go this morning, TO? snigger

by philcric Thu 08 Jul 2010, 10:13

skully wrote:Chuck is a bitter little man because he knows many won't properly acknowledge his "record" due to his highly dubious action. He's an embarrassment to the rich history of the game and will always be seen as a pariah.

Shane Warne thinks he's an 'outstanding servant to cricket'.

by Mick Sawyer Thu 08 Jul 2010, 10:31

sounds more like his detractors

The most outrageous cheat in the history of the game shoudn't be vilified?

by skully Thu 08 Jul 2010, 10:40

philcric wrote:
skully wrote:Chuck is a bitter little man because he knows many won't properly acknowledge his "record" due to his highly dubious action. He's an embarrassment to the rich history of the game and will always be seen as a pariah.

Shane Warne thinks he's an 'outstanding servant to cricket'.

Careful, phil, your subiness is showing.

by Merlin Thu 08 Jul 2010, 11:07

Re: Murali reckons Harbhajan can beat his Test record

Who really gives a monkey's f**k ?

Shane Warne thinks he's an 'outstanding servant to cricket'.

Providing Warne's on top table and Chuck is the waiter.

by skully Thu 08 Jul 2010, 11:13

by philcric Thu 08 Jul 2010, 15:21

skully wrote:
philcric wrote:
skully wrote:Chuck is a bitter little man because he knows many won't properly acknowledge his "record" due to his highly dubious action. He's an embarrassment to the rich history of the game and will always be seen as a pariah.

Shane Warne thinks he's an 'outstanding servant to cricket'.

Careful, phil, your subiness is showing.

Eh? How exactly?

I put in that link because you said Murali is an embarrassment to the game and Shane Warne said the exact opposite. I thought Aussies held Warne's cricketing knowledge and his opinions in high regard.

by Henry Thu 08 Jul 2010, 15:25

Harbhajan wont get close.

by Makaveli Fri 09 Jul 2010, 00:53

philcric wrote:
skully wrote:
philcric wrote:
skully wrote:Chuck is a bitter little man because he knows many won't properly acknowledge his "record" due to his highly dubious action. He's an embarrassment to the rich history of the game and will always be seen as a pariah.

Shane Warne thinks he's an 'outstanding servant to cricket'.

Careful, phil, your subiness is showing.

Eh? How exactly?

I put in that link because you said Murali is an embarrassment to the game and Shane Warne said the exact opposite. I thought Aussies held Warne's cricketing knowledge and his opinions in high regard.

Shut up, you are making sense.

by skully Fri 09 Jul 2010, 04:07

Why the dark look, Maka? Wink

by Sponsored content