The Royal Wedding
+29
Merlin
The One
Red
LeFromage
Chivalry Augustus
Winkle Spinner
Gary 111
eowyn
Hass
Bradman
Mick Sawyer
Henry
G.Wood
Basil
Zat
Paul Keating
Nath
JGK
Big Dog
horace
furriner
Allan D
embee
WideWally
lardbucket
skully
taipan
Brass Monkey
JKLever
33 posters
Page 9 of 10
Page 9 of 10 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
Re: The Royal Wedding
Apparently* chicks actually like the long stay at the crease.
JGK- Number of posts : 41790
Reputation : 161
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
With someone that fidgety that's all they're likely to get. Good thing she wears glasses.
Bradman- Number of posts : 17402
Age : 65
Reputation : 35
Registration date : 2008-08-13
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
I guess we'll end up with a lot of babies named Meghan over the next 9-12 months
Nath- Number of posts : 11958
Age : 44
Reputation : 52
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
Have noticed that many girls with the spelling Megan, insist that their name is pronounced MEGan. The old Meegan is not so popular these days.
Red- Number of posts : 17071
Reputation : 17
Registration date : 2007-10-28
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
We’ve always pronounced it the first way over here, I’ve only heard the other version in Aussie soaps.Red wrote:Have noticed that many girls with the spelling Megan, insist that their name is pronounced MEGan. The old Meegan is not so popular these days.
beamer- Number of posts : 15399
Reputation : 74
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
beamer wrote:We’ve always pronounced it the first way over here, I’ve only heard the other version in Aussie soaps.Red wrote:Have noticed that many girls with the spelling Megan, insist that their name is pronounced MEGan. The old Meegan is not so popular these days.
Same here. Don't think I've ever seen an Aussie soap.
taipan- Number of posts : 48416
Age : 123
Reputation : 115
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
They were the biggest thing on TV back in the day (late 80s and throughout the 90s, really)... not sure if the same was true in SA?taipan wrote:beamer wrote:We’ve always pronounced it the first way over here, I’ve only heard the other version in Aussie soaps.Red wrote:Have noticed that many girls with the spelling Megan, insist that their name is pronounced MEGan. The old Meegan is not so popular these days.
Same here. Don't think I've ever seen an Aussie soap.
beamer- Number of posts : 15399
Reputation : 74
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
beamer wrote:They were the biggest thing on TV back in the day (late 80s and throughout the 90s, really)... not sure if the same was true in SA?taipan wrote:beamer wrote:We’ve always pronounced it the first way over here, I’ve only heard the other version in Aussie soaps.Red wrote:Have noticed that many girls with the spelling Megan, insist that their name is pronounced MEGan. The old Meegan is not so popular these days.
Same here. Don't think I've ever seen an Aussie soap.
Might have been on here. Never watched them.
taipan- Number of posts : 48416
Age : 123
Reputation : 115
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
I’d like to say you were missing out, but not so sure really... let’s just say, we didn’t quite have the same choice of multi-channel sport and big budget box sets back then!
beamer- Number of posts : 15399
Reputation : 74
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
If they could reduce the civil list to two, it'd be a right royal weeding.
PeterCS- Number of posts : 43743
Reputation : 104
Registration date : 2008-05-23
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
is it over yet?
horace- Number of posts : 42573
Age : 114
Reputation : 90
Registration date : 2007-09-06
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
Long over.
PeterCS- Number of posts : 43743
Reputation : 104
Registration date : 2008-05-23
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
beamer wrote:They were the biggest thing on TV back in the day (late 80s and throughout the 90s, really)... not sure if the same was true in SA?taipan wrote:beamer wrote:We’ve always pronounced it the first way over here, I’ve only heard the other version in Aussie soaps.Red wrote:Have noticed that many girls with the spelling Megan, insist that their name is pronounced MEGan. The old Meegan is not so popular these days.
Same here. Don't think I've ever seen an Aussie soap.
I believe they were on over here as well, but have never watched them. 'Neighbours' was a bit like Fosters, I think ... surprisingly popular in England but thought very poor fare in Australia. Still, they both put dollars in Oz pockets I guess.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
116 - 9 - 400 - 4
lardbucket- Number of posts : 38069
Reputation : 173
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
JGK wrote:FWIW, Pip Middleton has a nice bod but average face. Nothing that couldn't be overcome by bigger cans mind you.
Can I belatedly nominate this for 'gold'?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
116 - 9 - 400 - 4
lardbucket- Number of posts : 38069
Reputation : 173
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
Nice Dress Lizzie
embee- Number of posts : 26185
Age : 57
Reputation : 263
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
nice work
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
116 - 9 - 400 - 4
lardbucket- Number of posts : 38069
Reputation : 173
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
Yeah... launched Kylie’s career, of course, 30 years ago. And a whole host of flash in the pan/wannabe pop stars in the subsequent years.lardbucket wrote:beamer wrote:They were the biggest thing on TV back in the day (late 80s and throughout the 90s, really)... not sure if the same was true in SA?taipan wrote:beamer wrote:We’ve always pronounced it the first way over here, I’ve only heard the other version in Aussie soaps.Red wrote:Have noticed that many girls with the spelling Megan, insist that their name is pronounced MEGan. The old Meegan is not so popular these days.
Same here. Don't think I've ever seen an Aussie soap.
I believe they were on over here as well, but have never watched them. 'Neighbours' was a bit like Fosters, I think ... surprisingly popular in England but thought very poor fare in Australia. Still, they both put dollars in Oz pockets I guess.
I think it, along with Home and Away, is still on Channel 5 (the unfashionable backwater of our “traditional” TV channels) but don’t think many watch them these days. I wonder if they still do the Neighbours set tours in Melbourne, or whether there’s too few of the current backpacker generation who care...
Fosters, agree on that one. Shit adverts as well. “For the thirsty”, says the latest one - well, you’d have to be bloody thirsty to drink that catpiss, I guess!
beamer- Number of posts : 15399
Reputation : 74
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
beamer wrote:Yeah... launched Kylie’s career, of course, 30 years ago. And a whole host of flash in the pan/wannabe pop stars in the subsequent years.lardbucket wrote:beamer wrote:They were the biggest thing on TV back in the day (late 80s and throughout the 90s, really)... not sure if the same was true in SA?taipan wrote:beamer wrote:We’ve always pronounced it the first way over here, I’ve only heard the other version in Aussie soaps.Red wrote:Have noticed that many girls with the spelling Megan, insist that their name is pronounced MEGan. The old Meegan is not so popular these days.
Same here. Don't think I've ever seen an Aussie soap.
I believe they were on over here as well, but have never watched them. 'Neighbours' was a bit like Fosters, I think ... surprisingly popular in England but thought very poor fare in Australia. Still, they both put dollars in Oz pockets I guess.
I think it, along with Home and Away, is still on Channel 5 (the unfashionable backwater of our “traditional” TV channels) but don’t think many watch them these days. I wonder if they still do the Neighbours set tours in Melbourne, or whether there’s too few of the current backpacker generation who care...
Fosters, agree on that one. Shit adverts as well. “For the thirsty”, says the latest one - well, you’d have to be bloody thirsty to drink that catpiss, I guess!
All relative I guess. Last time I was in the UK in 85 I was drinking Fosters from the tap. Not a bad Lager. Far preferable to bitter or mild, which were serious horsepiss.
taipan- Number of posts : 48416
Age : 123
Reputation : 115
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
Taips, I can remember drinking some decent yarp brews, but have forgotten their names (prolly had too many).
Oz has had a renaissance of craft brews over the last decade along with the other basics of the Ploughman's lunch - decent artisan bread and cheese. Is SA experiencing the same?
Oz has had a renaissance of craft brews over the last decade along with the other basics of the Ploughman's lunch - decent artisan bread and cheese. Is SA experiencing the same?
horace- Number of posts : 42573
Age : 114
Reputation : 90
Registration date : 2007-09-06
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
horace wrote:Taips, I can remember drinking some decent yarp brews, but have forgotten their names (prolly had too many).
Oz has had a renaissance of craft brews over the last decade along with the other basics of the Ploughman's lunch - decent artisan bread and cheese. Is SA experiencing the same?
Castle?
Re: The Royal Wedding
Big Dog wrote:horace wrote:Taips, I can remember drinking some decent yarp brews, but have forgotten their names (prolly had too many).
Oz has had a renaissance of craft brews over the last decade along with the other basics of the Ploughman's lunch - decent artisan bread and cheese. Is SA experiencing the same?
Castle?
That's it BD. Thanks.
horace- Number of posts : 42573
Age : 114
Reputation : 90
Registration date : 2007-09-06
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
Am I the only person in the world who filed this event under "H" for HGAF?
Or is that harsh on my part? What a yawn fest.
Or is that harsh on my part? What a yawn fest.
skully- Number of posts : 105884
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
skully wrote:Am I the only person in the world who filed this event under "H" for HGAF?
Or is that harsh on my part? What a yawn fest.
Harry Gets A F****?
JGK- Number of posts : 41790
Reputation : 161
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
Ah yes, should've been "WGAF".
skully- Number of posts : 105884
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Page 9 of 10 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
Similar topics
» I am going to Jeff's wedding!
» Pool on Danny's wedding
» Pull on Danny's Wedding
» The perils of prevaricating over an Indian wedding
» Game 24: Royal v Kings XI, Durban, May 1
» Pool on Danny's wedding
» Pull on Danny's Wedding
» The perils of prevaricating over an Indian wedding
» Game 24: Royal v Kings XI, Durban, May 1
Page 9 of 10
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
Today at 00:14 by lardbucket
» Anyone seen any good movies recently?
Yesterday at 12:18 by skully
» Jesus, this place is dead...
Yesterday at 08:58 by Nath
» Rugby League 2024
Yesterday at 08:58 by Nath
» AFL 2024
Thu 25 Apr 2024, 10:09 by lardbucket
» Celebrity Death List MMXXIV/The Death Thread 2024
Thu 25 Apr 2024, 09:54 by Fred Nerk
» In other news ....
Wed 24 Apr 2024, 13:51 by Fred Nerk
» Upcoming Test Cricket
Tue 23 Apr 2024, 17:39 by Lost Wombat
» Your favourite sporting pictures...
Mon 22 Apr 2024, 11:23 by embee