Re: The reported threads.

by skully Sat 02 Jul 2011, 14:06

lardbucket wrote:
skully wrote:

Sauce on chips is bad enough, but ginger as well? Where will it end?

Badly?

by PeterCS Sat 02 Jul 2011, 14:06

Ah, go easy on Bradders. Everyone gets steamed up sometimes.

by PeterCS Sat 02 Jul 2011, 14:07

Sometimes the steam is a righteous steam.

On FB, it's more often than not pissing in the wind.

And you know where that usually leads.

by skully Sat 02 Jul 2011, 14:08

PeterCS wrote:Ah, go easy on Bradders. Everyone gets steamed up sometimes.

He's big and ugly enough, although mentally challenged, to look after himself, Pete.

by Bradman Sat 02 Jul 2011, 14:28

skully wrote:
Bradman wrote:
skully wrote:
Bradman wrote:
skully wrote:
PeterCS wrote:Well, the SFB was a genuine question.

I welcome Bradman's contributions, - as I do anyone else's in fact.

I just shrug at, shrug off or ignore the worse ones.
Sh!t Fer Brains. qmy's well thought out, but 2 years late retort (that's how slow Banjos are) to some hurtful posts made by tac towards qmy. Chippies hold grudge's forever, that's why they are called chippies.

Tac couldn't hurt a fly. His posts were always a joke and usually revolved around accusing me of being someone I couldn't be and retorting to peurile schoolyard taunts when it was pointed out.

Still defending your old buddy on the same thread you distanced yourself from him. Pretty pissweak.

As for grudges. You just keep that chip on your shoulder over the election and refuse to debate with substance.
Nice work, Grudge boy. Ace work.

Who's the chick?
That's the Vulture as a 14 year old when you and she used to get drunk and feel each other up.

(sigh) Still paying for relaying something I thought ABC forumers might have found amusing when it happened eight years ago. For those of you not familiar with Skully's obsession with said Prime Minister and myself a little background.

Eight years ago I was stuck in Kakadu National Park in admist some fairly heated negotiations between the then ruling fascists and the owners. At the end of the day I was having a beer in the only pub for about a thousand square miles with a fairly senior Aboriginal leader and his senior media advisor.

An obscure (I'd never heard of her) politician who'd been appointed shadow minister for Aboriginal Affairs strolled in and being a ranga, not used to the climate in the NT and being way out of her depth gratefully accepted my (titual) Boss' offer of some downtime. She stuck around for a few beers because she really didn't want to face, after a long day, representations about stuff she, as a shadow minister, had no control over.

When said media advisor started panicking and trying to shut down said downtime I pulled rank and said "give the lady a break". Eventually when the officials from the NTG, my organisation and some political staffers realised we'd sort of borrowed her, all hell broke loose. Fortunately for the underlings my (T)B told them all to pull their heads in and she went into said representations in a much more relaxed mood.

I've said it before and I'll say it again. I knew then she was punching the ticket and her record on Aboriginal Affairs since has seen me not change my opinion. It was a couple of hours in the middle of nowhere but Skullchip keeps bringing it up. Probably something to do with eggs, faces and booze.

by skully Sat 02 Jul 2011, 14:30

Oh look, he's back with a very slow response. Well played, ol' bean. How'd the Reds go?

You do realise I don't read any of your dribble? Espesh when it's a boring Vikas-like diatribe, ya silly white shoe wearer. Rolling Eyes

by PeterCS Sat 02 Jul 2011, 14:31

Is this Gillard? Otherwise I don't follow.

But maybe it is not for me to understand, being half way round the world.

by Bradman Sat 02 Jul 2011, 14:33

PeterCS wrote:Ah, go easy on Bradders. Everyone gets steamed up sometimes.

Who the fark's getting steamed up. I'm having a ball.

by skully Sat 02 Jul 2011, 14:33

Poor ol' qmy can't stand not getting the last word. And he thinks if he repeats himself often enough, or stamps his club feet enough, he'll somehow WIN. Meh, all I see is unintelligible Banjo jibberish. And he reckons he's a lawyer or somesuch. shrug

by PeterCS Sat 02 Jul 2011, 14:34

skully wrote:

"You can keep your laughable chipolata to yourself fella - I've got something a lot juicier and more satisfying right here."

by Bradman Sat 02 Jul 2011, 14:38

skully wrote:Oh look, he's back with a very slow response. Well played, ol' bean. How'd the Reds go?

You do realise I don't read any of your dribble? Espesh when it's a boring Vikas-like diatribe, ya silly white shoe wearer.

1) You've obviously read it,

2) It's abit hard to be a white shoe wearer and a pinko,

3) I smoke dickhead and I smoke outside thus the slow response.

As I've got all night as i have to wait for the fire to go out there will probably be a lot of smoke breaks.

Oh! And they won.

And she looked better eight years ago then she did in that shot.

by skully Sat 02 Jul 2011, 14:42

Bradman wrote:3) I smoke dickhead

Warp speed there, qmy. 12 minutes to respond. Well done. I expected 30 minutes.

Who won again and why? And you've been smoking dickhead? I hope it tasted nice. Well done. Keep up the good work. Laughing

by Gary 111 Sat 02 Jul 2011, 14:48

Looks like Bradman's playing the bowling with ease.

by skully Sat 02 Jul 2011, 14:52

It's pretty easy to play with ease when you've eased into 3/4 of a bottle of Vickers. No good for the reflexes, but ace for the nerves and relaxation.

I predict he'll make a worthy 10 ball duck, taking some shine off the new ball.

by Zat Sat 02 Jul 2011, 15:25

Well, a thread with much promise has been completely rooted. I hope you're proud of yourselves.

by Bradman Sat 02 Jul 2011, 15:43

Zat wrote:Well, a thread with much promise has been completely rooted. I hope you're proud of yourselves.

Hey I tried. Anyway how hard is it to get athread back on track.

It was enlightening from my point of view because I only knew the rough details od tac's misdemeanours. Can't believe the qunt went overboard over some of that tame crap.

If anyone on the OzPol thread was of a like mind this place might have shut down.

Though does his legacy still prevail.....I hated ***** at school.

by Bradman Sat 02 Jul 2011, 15:44

[quote="Bradman"]

Zat wrote:Well, a thread with much promise has been completely rooted. I hope you're proud of yourselves.

Hey I tried. Anyway how hard is it to get athread back on track.

It was enlightening from my point of view because I only knew the rough details od tac's misdemeanours. Can't believe the qunt went overboard over some of that tame crap.

If anyone on the OzPol thread was of a like mind this place might have shut down.

Though does his legacy still prevail.....I hated ***** at school.[/quote]

Seems it does.

by Guest Sat 02 Jul 2011, 17:33

Brass Monkey wrote:
Dello wrote:
It was the first ever report. I wasn't entirely sure what would happen with the hosts (having initially heard they were prone to deleting entire forums without so much as a warning if their T&Cs were even in the slightest violated), so I figured I'd cover all bases and delete the "offending" remarks and close the thread.

Turns out they don't really give a merde.

Aww, fresh and virginal Dello.

Didn't take you long to become a cynical, cold-sored skank with cum dripping out of your knickers. Welcome to vilksrock. Does that work? No? Welcome to vilks' world.

You say that like it's a bad thing.

lardbucket wrote:
skully wrote:Jezus, how p!ssed is qmy?

He's running at about 0.3 vilks

This new measurement needs to be investigated and studied scientifically. I am willing to offer myself as a guinea pig.

Bradman wrote:
I object to that. I'm at least 0.5 vilks and all of it legal. At least for the time being.

Unless of course it already has been defined, measured etc. and I'm just wanking like a qunt in the dark.

Anyone care to fill me in?

by Guest Sat 02 Jul 2011, 17:35

Oh and also, isn't this naming and shaming thing a sure fire way to actually get this place shut down?

Funny as f**k but I can't see it ending well.

by Basil Sat 02 Jul 2011, 18:53

vilkrang wrote:Oh and also, isn't this naming and shaming thing a sure fire way to actually get this place shut down?

Funny as f**k but I can't see it ending well.

I can imagine Tac being mightily riled at being outed as a bit of a spineless chimp and he might just be tempted to try to bring the whole place down - but his previous efforts came to naught so perhaps our hosts have worked him out.

by LeFromage Sat 02 Jul 2011, 19:15

vilkrang wrote:Oh and also, isn't this naming and shaming thing a sure fire way to actually get this place shut down?

I don't even work here anymore.

by taipan Sat 02 Jul 2011, 20:09

Dello wrote:
vilkrang wrote:Oh and also, isn't this naming and shaming thing a sure fire way to actually get this place shut down?

I don't even work here anymore.

WTF are you again?

by PeterCS Sat 02 Jul 2011, 20:11

The Mervyn Peake of cricket wardenship.

And I am not being sarky.

by PeterCS Sat 02 Jul 2011, 20:14

by furriner Sat 02 Jul 2011, 22:06

I have sympathy for some of the complaints - 'Nips' is a lousy word to use, and Trev's verbal assault on eowyn was utter filth.

Having said that, the key takeaway is that the biggest sook was an Aussie? Big talker, and all the time a big sook.

That's so apt.

Edit: Great thread.

by Sponsored content