Jimmy Savile
+25
Fred Nerk
eowyn
Ethics? The Gall!
Neil D
Blackadder
Merlin
WideWally
Big Dog
Hass
beamer
G.Wood
OP Tipping
Red
skully
taipan
horace
embee
lardbucket
Basil
LeFromage
tricycle
JGK
Henry
Brass Monkey
PeterCS
29 posters
Page 24 of 27
Page 24 of 27 • 1 ... 13 ... 23, 24, 25, 26, 27
Re: Jimmy Savile
Yeah and that'll come out in the appeal process. I don't know what the trial judge said, but if he explained to them the weight they should give to certain evidence against other evidence, or lack thereof; i.e he did everything right, then there are no grounds.
I haven't heard an commentary thus far casting doubt on anything but the reliability of the evidence and that mainly came from the first 45 minutes of Andrew Bolt's show last night. Some of the stuff you mentioned is in the realm of original court process. If the jury was instructed correctly the higher court would have to go out on a limb.
But again I haven't seen any transcripts.
I haven't heard an commentary thus far casting doubt on anything but the reliability of the evidence and that mainly came from the first 45 minutes of Andrew Bolt's show last night. Some of the stuff you mentioned is in the realm of original court process. If the jury was instructed correctly the higher court would have to go out on a limb.
But again I haven't seen any transcripts.
Bradman- Number of posts : 17402
Age : 65
Reputation : 35
Registration date : 2008-08-13
Flag/Background :
Re: Jimmy Savile
Pell's defence lawyer sounds like a piece of work.
Basil- Number of posts : 15936
Age : 65
Reputation : 72
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: Jimmy Savile
Basil wrote:Pell's defence lawyer sounds like a piece of work.
Aye. His comments describing the crimes as vanilla were vile.
Robert 'Rigor Mortis' turns a colourful phrase but I expect even Pell cringed at that.
horace- Number of posts : 42573
Age : 114
Reputation : 90
Registration date : 2007-09-06
Flag/Background :
Re: Jimmy Savile
I thought it was an admission of guilt.
skully- Number of posts : 105974
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
embee- Number of posts : 26215
Age : 57
Reputation : 263
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
embee- Number of posts : 26215
Age : 57
Reputation : 263
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
embee- Number of posts : 26215
Age : 57
Reputation : 263
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: Jimmy Savile
Admit to laughing at the images.
Ultimately tho people like the Pellvert are on borrowed time before they meet the blessed silence of death and the simple alteration of carbon.
Ultimately tho people like the Pellvert are on borrowed time before they meet the blessed silence of death and the simple alteration of carbon.
horace- Number of posts : 42573
Age : 114
Reputation : 90
Registration date : 2007-09-06
Flag/Background :
Re: Jimmy Savile
Well this is going to drag on for a bit (if Bolt has anything to do with it) but those memes probably sum it up. Betya little johnny rat qunt wouldn't have said a thing if he was still seeking office anywhere but the Rock Spider protection unit in Long Bay.
Bradman- Number of posts : 17402
Age : 65
Reputation : 35
Registration date : 2008-08-13
Flag/Background :
Re: Jimmy Savile
Meanwhile, there is a special place in hell reserved for this prick...
https://www.smh.com.au/national/western-australia/perth-paedophile-jailed-for-21-years-over-group-rape-of-six-year-old-girl-20190301-p5118t.html
https://www.smh.com.au/national/western-australia/perth-paedophile-jailed-for-21-years-over-group-rape-of-six-year-old-girl-20190301-p5118t.html
JGK- Number of posts : 41790
Reputation : 161
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Jimmy Savile
Jesus Christ! What about Mummy?
Bradman- Number of posts : 17402
Age : 65
Reputation : 35
Registration date : 2008-08-13
Flag/Background :
Re: Jimmy Savile
Anyone watch the Michael Jackson show?
JGK- Number of posts : 41790
Reputation : 161
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Jimmy Savile
Pellvert will spend at least 3 years and 8 months in gaol unless his appeal is successful.
horace- Number of posts : 42573
Age : 114
Reputation : 90
Registration date : 2007-09-06
Flag/Background :
Re: Jimmy Savile
This has been flying under the radar
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-merseyside-47561781
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-merseyside-47561781
taipan- Number of posts : 48416
Age : 123
Reputation : 115
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Jimmy Savile
Steel has since been suspended by his party.taipan wrote:This has been flying under the radar
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-merseyside-47561781
Basil- Number of posts : 15936
Age : 65
Reputation : 72
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: Jimmy Savile
Basil wrote:Steel has since been suspended by his party.taipan wrote:This has been flying under the radar
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-merseyside-47561781
That's how I picked up on it. He is a total disgrace.
taipan- Number of posts : 48416
Age : 123
Reputation : 115
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Jimmy Savile
The sheer ambivalence of his attitude is appalling. Sadly it is probably in tune with prevailing attitudes at the time.taipan wrote:Basil wrote:Steel has since been suspended by his party.taipan wrote:This has been flying under the radar
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-merseyside-47561781
That's how I picked up on it. He is a total disgrace.
Basil- Number of posts : 15936
Age : 65
Reputation : 72
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Demelza- Number of posts : 1086
Age : 59
Reputation : 8
Registration date : 2009-05-13
Flag/Background :
Re: Jimmy Savile
Dem!!!!
Great to see you.
Great to see you.
skully- Number of posts : 105974
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Jimmy Savile
For Q.
The Pell appeal rejection (2-1) probably belongs in here.
The Pell appeal rejection (2-1) probably belongs in here.
skully- Number of posts : 105974
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Jimmy Savile
Yeah couldn't remember where the last discussion took place. Though it's about as political as it gets.
Bradman- Number of posts : 17402
Age : 65
Reputation : 35
Registration date : 2008-08-13
Flag/Background :
Re: Jimmy Savile
horrie will be pleased, although Pell is now going to his last chance appeal.
skully- Number of posts : 105974
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Jimmy Savile
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
116 - 9 - 400 - 4
lardbucket- Number of posts : 38113
Reputation : 173
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: Jimmy Savile
Cosby appeal rejected
"Bill Cosby has lost his bid to overturn his sexual assault conviction, as an appeals court ruled in the first celebrity trial of the #MeToo era.
In its ruling, the Superior Court upheld the right of prosecutors to call other accusers to bolster their case — the same issue that was fought over in pre-trial hearings before movie mogul Harvey Weinstein’s sexual assault trial.
“This decision is a reminder that no one is above the law,” Andrea Constand, the victim in Cosby’s case, said.
Cosby’s lawyers in his appeal said the suburban Philadelphia judge had improperly allowed the five women to testify at last year’s retrial although he’d let just one woman testify at the first trial in 2017.
But the Superior Court said Pennsylvania law allows the testimony if it shows Cosby had a “signature” pattern of drugging and molesting women.
“Here, the (prior bad act) evidence established appellant’s unique sexual assault playbook,” the court said, noting that “no two events will ever be identical.”
The court went on to say that the similarities were no accident."
-----------------------------------
Rot in hell, you grub.
"Bill Cosby has lost his bid to overturn his sexual assault conviction, as an appeals court ruled in the first celebrity trial of the #MeToo era.
In its ruling, the Superior Court upheld the right of prosecutors to call other accusers to bolster their case — the same issue that was fought over in pre-trial hearings before movie mogul Harvey Weinstein’s sexual assault trial.
“This decision is a reminder that no one is above the law,” Andrea Constand, the victim in Cosby’s case, said.
Cosby’s lawyers in his appeal said the suburban Philadelphia judge had improperly allowed the five women to testify at last year’s retrial although he’d let just one woman testify at the first trial in 2017.
But the Superior Court said Pennsylvania law allows the testimony if it shows Cosby had a “signature” pattern of drugging and molesting women.
“Here, the (prior bad act) evidence established appellant’s unique sexual assault playbook,” the court said, noting that “no two events will ever be identical.”
The court went on to say that the similarities were no accident."
-----------------------------------
Rot in hell, you grub.
skully- Number of posts : 105974
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Page 24 of 27 • 1 ... 13 ... 23, 24, 25, 26, 27
Similar topics
» I like Jimmy
» How far can Jimmy go?
» Jimmy out of tour to S/L
» Congratulations Jimmy
» Jimmy Anderson is the best ever....
» How far can Jimmy go?
» Jimmy out of tour to S/L
» Congratulations Jimmy
» Jimmy Anderson is the best ever....
Page 24 of 27
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
Today at 03:37 by Fred Nerk
» State of Origin Thread
Today at 01:53 by skully
» AFL 2024
Today at 01:45 by skully
» Rugby League 2024
Yesterday at 13:58 by skully
» Jesus, this place is dead (II)
Thu 16 May 2024, 15:08 by skully
» The Football (soccer) thread
Wed 15 May 2024, 09:47 by skully
» Celebrity Death List MMXXIV/The Death Thread 2024
Tue 14 May 2024, 22:01 by lardbucket
» Sheffield Shield 2024/25
Tue 14 May 2024, 10:25 by embee
» Apology
Mon 13 May 2024, 09:41 by Nath