Re: Australia v South Africa, 3rd Test, Perth, 30 November - 4 December, 2012

by skully Sat 01 Dec 2012, 04:24

Stain could get 7 here.

by skully Sat 01 Dec 2012, 04:33

5-85 in the session. A bit of a 50:50 call, but I think the SAffies might've just taken the honours. Cool

by skully Sat 01 Dec 2012, 04:34

I gotta disappear for the 2nd session. Maybe the skully Parallel Universe theory will kick in and Aus will fightback. Maybe?

by Guest Sat 01 Dec 2012, 04:40

Star showing some old ODI highlights.

Anthony Stuart's ODI hat-trick!

by Nath Sat 01 Dec 2012, 04:41

good thing we have your mate Wade playing, eh skully? Wink

by skully Sat 01 Dec 2012, 04:53

He was due, Nath. And hopefully the big Vomit Sweat Monster can stay with him.

by Guest Sat 01 Dec 2012, 05:04

Klämmssøn wrote:Star showing some old ODI highlights.

Anthony Stuart's ODI hat-trick!

Some things never change though.

Greig: "Oh, that's got to be close to LBW... no, he's bowled him!!!"

by OP Tipping Sat 01 Dec 2012, 05:08

Surely Dissa won't go through his entire final series without a start.

by tricycle Sat 01 Dec 2012, 05:22

Klämmssøn wrote:
Klämmssøn wrote:Star showing some old ODI highlights.

Anthony Stuart's ODI hat-trick!

Some things never change though.

Greig: "Oh, that's got to be close to LBW... no, he's bowled him!!!"

Wasim Akram?

by furriner Sat 01 Dec 2012, 05:29

So whatever happened to Anthony Stuart?

by Henry Sat 01 Dec 2012, 05:34

Coaching NSW, isn't he?

by taipan Sat 01 Dec 2012, 05:43

Morkel should be bowling

by baggygreen Sat 01 Dec 2012, 05:45

Ponting getting off a sinking ship as quickly as possible. Terrible performance from anyone not named Wade.

by taipan Sat 01 Dec 2012, 05:51

baggygreen wrote:Ponting getting off a sinking ship as quickly as possible. Terrible performance from anyone not named Wade.

You wonder how much Hussey has left in the tank

by Nath Sat 01 Dec 2012, 05:55

oh Wade

by Big Dog Sat 01 Dec 2012, 05:55

Woefull shot from Weed

by Mick Sawyer Sat 01 Dec 2012, 05:55

skully wrote:
Big Dog wrote:Aust 6/45. At least we avoided the follow on.
Still, despite the hyperbole it just highlights what a mediocre performance our bowlers put in.
It more shows the mediocre batting side that we have that has been disguised by Pup and Paris's remarkable purple patches.

BD was in a tough spot. If he didn't slag our bowlers people would go thinking hilf is replaceable and any thought of mentioning passenger batsmen is,well, unTasmanian.

by baggygreen Sat 01 Dec 2012, 05:59

Shocking shot from Wade, not what you want a batsman to make when the team is so far in the shit.

taipan wrote:
baggygreen wrote:Ponting getting off a sinking ship as quickly as possible. Terrible performance from anyone not named Wade.

You wonder how much Hussey has left in the tank

Plenty if you judge on the performances in the last 2 tests.

by Big Dog Sat 01 Dec 2012, 06:00

Mick Sawyer wrote:
skully wrote:
Big Dog wrote:Aust 6/45. At least we avoided the follow on.
Still, despite the hyperbole it just highlights what a mediocre performance our bowlers put in.
It more shows the mediocre batting side that we have that has been disguised by Pup and Paris's remarkable purple patches.

BD was is a tough spot. If he didn't slag our bowlers people would go thinking hilf is replaceable and any thought of mentioning passenger batsmen is,well, unTasmanian.

I don't recall even mentioning Hilf. My beef is having average performing bowlers selected while the best performing nine bowlers in the country are ignored.

by taipan Sat 01 Dec 2012, 06:04

baggygreen wrote:Shocking shot from Wade, not what you want a batsman to make when the team is so far in the shit.

taipan wrote:
baggygreen wrote:Ponting getting off a sinking ship as quickly as possible. Terrible performance from anyone not named Wade.

You wonder how much Hussey has left in the tank

Plenty if you judge on the performances in the last 2 tests.

More a comment on his age.

by Brass Monkey Sat 01 Dec 2012, 06:07

Red wrote:Good day for the Aussies. Possibly a good toss to lose too. Should get a big lead here and put the game out of reach.

by baggygreen Sat 01 Dec 2012, 06:14

Big Dog wrote:
Mick Sawyer wrote:
skully wrote:
Big Dog wrote:Aust 6/45. At least we avoided the follow on.
Still, despite the hyperbole it just highlights what a mediocre performance our bowlers put in.
It more shows the mediocre batting side that we have that has been disguised by Pup and Paris's remarkable purple patches.

BD was is a tough spot. If he didn't slag our bowlers people would go thinking hilf is replaceable and any thought of mentioning passenger batsmen is,well, unTasmanian.

I don't recall even mentioning Hilf. My beef is having average performing bowlers selected while the best performing nine bowlers in the country are ignored.

9 bowlers? Ooi who would you name?

by Big Dog Sat 01 Dec 2012, 06:18

baggygreen wrote:
Big Dog wrote:
Mick Sawyer wrote:
skully wrote:
Big Dog wrote:Aust 6/45. At least we avoided the follow on.
Still, despite the hyperbole it just highlights what a mediocre performance our bowlers put in.
It more shows the mediocre batting side that we have that has been disguised by Pup and Paris's remarkable purple patches.

BD was is a tough spot. If he didn't slag our bowlers people would go thinking hilf is replaceable and any thought of mentioning passenger batsmen is,well, unTasmanian.

I don't recall even mentioning Hilf. My beef is having average performing bowlers selected while the best performing nine bowlers in the country are ignored.

9 bowlers? Ooi who would you name?

There are 5 better than Hastings, 9 better than Johnson & 21 better than Hazlewood

by Mick Sawyer Sat 01 Dec 2012, 06:18

Big Dog wrote:

I don't recall even mentioning Hilf. My beef is having average performing bowlers selected while the best performing nine bowlers in the country are ignored.

I think it was smart to leave out Hilf and Siddle for this game. Both should be named for the next game.

The four bowlers selected have just bowled out the #1 side for 225.

by Big Dog Sat 01 Dec 2012, 06:20

Mick Sawyer wrote:
Big Dog wrote:

I don't recall even mentioning Hilf. My beef is having average performing bowlers selected while the best performing nine bowlers in the country are ignored.

I think it was smart to leave out Hilf and Siddle for this game. Both should be named for the next game.

The four bowlers selected have just bowled out the #1 side for 225.

Away from the WACA it would probably be a different story.

by Sponsored content