Re: Bannies v subis

by Zat Thu 18 Mar 2010, 08:52

23 year old gf? FFS. The Lady Empress was there too.

You went the grope, don't try to push the blame on to me.

by skully Thu 18 Mar 2010, 09:18

You are inaccurate in your recounting. TLE was not there at the time of the alleged grope. Cool

by Zat Thu 18 Mar 2010, 09:40

She was there during the evening. Which would make it stupid in the extreme to have a 23yo gf there...

by skully Thu 18 Mar 2010, 09:58

Your secret is safe with me, Emperor. Wink

by lardbucket Thu 18 Mar 2010, 12:54

embee wrote:My ancestors came from Ireland , Denmark , Germany and England to settle in Australia way back in the 19th century. The English ancestor happened to be from Norfolk

Dear old Aunt Nadia ...

by taipan Thu 18 Mar 2010, 19:39

skully wrote:Not me. I have met the 23 year old.

She was subi?

by furriner Sat 20 Mar 2010, 01:38

Only thing I can say is:

eoqyn speaks some superbly insightful stuff, and she was from some time ago a pleasure to read, but then of course, by the traditions of this forum she's almost made to bugger off.

F*ck you all.

by skully Sat 20 Mar 2010, 02:51

On the turps tonight, furry? drunken

by furriner Sat 20 Mar 2010, 03:06

No skulls, more's the pity.

by Zat Sat 20 Mar 2010, 23:54

Too many people take this foruming lark too seriously.

by CT Sun 21 Mar 2010, 10:01

you guys are a crack up. what you need is a good stoush with a couple of subis on here is always good for a laugh or two. lol!

by eowyn Sun 21 Mar 2010, 15:20

Zat wrote:Too many people take this foruming lark too seriously.

No, some of us just don't like deliberately offending people we share a place of common interest with.

And thank you, furry, I've not totally buggered off but I am getting more and more wary of posting my thoughts on anything serious.

by taipan Sun 21 Mar 2010, 15:49

eowyn wrote:
No, some of us just don't like deliberately offending people we share a place of common interest with.

This forum has always thrived on controversary. Like it or not it is the name of the game.

And yes, some people take it far too seriously.

by eowyn Sun 21 Mar 2010, 17:12

Until recently telling someone they were "on the rag" or "pissed" wasn't a way of having an intelligent debate. Where is it stated you can't have a serious discussion on here?

I care about how my behaviour effects other people, sad as I am.

by Guest Sun 21 Mar 2010, 17:52

eowyn wrote:Until recently telling someone they were "on the rag" or "pissed" wasn't a way of having an intelligent debate. Where is it stated you can't have a serious discussion on here?

I care about how my behaviour effects other people, sad as I am.

Nah not sad at all. The internet being as it is means there will always be some arseholes on every forum. It's very easy to be a dick and have a joke at other people's expense, takes a bit more to act decently so keep caring and acting as you do.

by skully Sun 21 Mar 2010, 19:27

eowyn wrote:Until recently telling someone they were "on the rag" or "pissed" wasn't a way of having an intelligent debate. Where is it stated you can't have a serious discussion on here?

I care about how my behaviour effects other people, sad as I am.

Not one for using your own derogatory terms then, ay, Ange? columbo

One has to take care if one wants to be the forum censor.

by G.Wood Sun 21 Mar 2010, 22:14

furriner wrote:Only thing I can say is:

eoqyn speaks some superbly insightful stuff, and she was from some time ago a pleasure to read, but then of course, by the traditions of this forum she's almost made to bugger off.

F*ck you all.

sage furrster

by tac Sun 21 Mar 2010, 23:46

skully wrote:
eowyn wrote:Until recently telling someone they were "on the rag" or "pissed" wasn't a way of having an intelligent debate. Where is it stated you can't have a serious discussion on here?

I care about how my behaviour effects other people, sad as I am.
Not one for using your own derogatory terms then, ay, Ange?

One has to take care if one wants to be the forum censor.

Skully, are you deliberately being a bit simple? Or has qmy finally rubbed off on you?

by G.Wood Sun 21 Mar 2010, 23:58

qmy seems to be another forummer that RobI has driven away

[tac]not that that's a bad thing[/tac]

by tac Mon 22 Mar 2010, 00:02

phurt . . .qmy was always a luagh . . . and alrose rose to a poke

by G.Wood Mon 22 Mar 2010, 00:06

tac wrote:phurt . . .qmy was always a luagh . . . and alrose rose to a poke

Was that supposed to be a sentence or are you tapping your cock on the keyboard again?

by horace Mon 22 Mar 2010, 00:06

being a peaceful old bloke who avoids conflict or causing offence, I'm with Furri and Ange on this one

by tac Mon 22 Mar 2010, 00:11

G.Wood wrote:
tac wrote:phurt . . .qmy was always a luagh . . . and alrose rose to a poke

Was that supposed to be a sentence or are you tapping your cock on the keyboard again?

TBH, woody, on rereading that, it must have been the latter . . . still, nice of you to remember one of my better lines . .

by G.Wood Mon 22 Mar 2010, 00:15

it was a good one and, surprisingly, more fun than one might expect.

by skully Mon 22 Mar 2010, 01:10

tac wrote:
skully wrote:
eowyn wrote:Until recently telling someone they were "on the rag" or "pissed" wasn't a way of having an intelligent debate. Where is it stated you can't have a serious discussion on here?

I care about how my behaviour effects other people, sad as I am.
Not one for using your own derogatory terms then, ay, Ange?

One has to take care if one wants to be the forum censor.

Skully, are you deliberately being a bit simple? Or has qmy finally rubbed off on you?

Nothing like having half the info to make a judgment, ay, taccy? Not sure you know what you are talking about in this instance. aye-aye

by Sponsored content