Bannies v subis
+22
Demelza
bodyline
G.Wood
Basil
Ash
DJ_Smerk
eowyn
The One
philcric
Fred Nerk
Zat
horace
buckSH
embee
furriner
tac
taipan
CT
Merlin
lardbucket
Shoeshine
skully
26 posters
Page 4 of 9
Page 4 of 9 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Re: Bannies v subis
What amuses me most is the racist undecurrent in not wanting to be called a subi . . . somehow the Bannie subis feel it putsthem in the same boat with the stupid Paks and Bangers . . . subi as an abbreviation might be deemed condescending, but subcontinental is no more racist than latin american, caribbean, sub-Saharan african, mediterranean or other term we use to describe regions instead of individual countries within the region . . .besides, the buggers are all tarred with the same brush, anyway . . .
tac- Number of posts : 19270
Reputation : 24
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Bannies v subis
And I've hardly used it at all since all the sookin' went on. Hence my Q about would Bannies end up under the same heading.embee wrote:PS ..I use the term subi a lot less than I used to because someone politely asked me not to...
I guess I'm just getting bored with all the PC bulltwang on here. I prefer to say what I think, which is afterall the cornerstone of forumming.
If you're a qunt then I'll call you a qunt. If people think I'm being a qunt, then let them say so. Words on a page. [awaits string of one-word posts ]
skully- Number of posts : 105969
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
tac- Number of posts : 19270
Reputation : 24
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Bannies v subis
Hehe, on queue. Cheers tac.
I'll be disappointed if there aren't at least 4 or 5 more.
I'll be disappointed if there aren't at least 4 or 5 more.
skully- Number of posts : 105969
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Bannies v subis
a string of qunts? I always imagined they'd be called a quiver of qunts . . .
tac- Number of posts : 19270
Reputation : 24
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Bannies v subis
Right now, one would make me quiver.
skully- Number of posts : 105969
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Bannies v subis
tac wrote:What amuses me most is the racist undecurrent in not wanting to be called a subi . . . somehow the Bannie subis feel it putsthem in the same boat with the stupid Paks and Bangers . . . subi as an abbreviation might be deemed condescending, but subcontinental is no more racist than latin american, caribbean, sub-Saharan african, mediterranean or other term we use to describe regions instead of individual countries within the region . . .besides, the buggers are all tarred with the same brush, anyway . . .
Being labelled a South Pacificer or Southern Hemispherian and getting lobbed in with Kiwis and Jaaps is the equivalent
It's bad enough we get lobbed in with Sozzies now
embee- Number of posts : 26215
Age : 57
Reputation : 263
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: Bannies v subis
skully wrote:
Some Aussies reacted adversely to "Cons"?? PMSL. They must have been weak qunts.
I find it a term of endearment when lobbed at me from an English comrade.
Which is exactly as it should be!
Anyone trying to "score points" by using the term 'Cons' in a derrogative sense these days against Aussies is only kidding themselves ... and for offence to be taken (and shown) only fuels the dare ...
If I could have a quid for everytime I've bantered with Aussie mates in pubs when they've done the "soap and baths" routine, and I/other Pom mates have retorted with the "convict offspring" riposte, I'd be a bloody millionaire right now.
Pre 2005 Ashes, Sky had a brilliant sketch involving Warne and ??? being sentenced and put on a convict ship way back in the 1800's whilst Gower and Co looked on as the judiciary ... then through a pall of smoke, the clock was fast forwarded to 2005 .. as Warne walked forward in whites flicking up a cricket ball and a glint in his eye (seeking revenge presumably) .... great theatre ... and it worked well ! Malice aforethought ? Absolute bollocks!
The irony was that you buggers lost that particular Ashes series !!
Merlin- Number of posts : 14718
Reputation : 4
Registration date : 2007-09-05
Flag/Background :
Re: Bannies v subis
skully wrote:
I guess I'm just getting bored with all the PC bulltwang on here. I prefer to say what I think, which is afterall the cornerstone offorumming.democracy
If you're a qunt then I'll call you a qunt. If people think I'm being a qunt, then let them say so. Words on a page. [awaits string of one-word posts ]
Bang on .... In a nutshell.
Merlin- Number of posts : 14718
Reputation : 4
Registration date : 2007-09-05
Flag/Background :
Re: Bannies v subis
Fair call, Merls. All this sookin' and attempting to change a forummer's style or habits is a farkin tedious waste of time.
"Oh please, can't we all get along?" Boo-farkin-hoo.
The post count in here is sh!tty enough without turning it into some Facebook style love-fest.
"Oh please, can't we all get along?" Boo-farkin-hoo.
The post count in here is sh!tty enough without turning it into some Facebook style love-fest.
skully- Number of posts : 105969
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Bannies v subis
Exactly.skully wrote:"Oh please, can't we all get along?" Boo-farkin-hoo.
Next there'll be people rushing off to report things...
Zat- Number of posts : 28872
Reputation : 86
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background :
Re: Bannies v subis
No, shirley not. Do people do that? It would seem a very angsty thing to do.
What sort of chaps would do such a thing?
What sort of chaps would do such a thing?
skully- Number of posts : 105969
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Bannies v subis
I may have done it in the very early days of this board, just to see what happens.
- Spoiler:
- As it turns out, SFA, except for being called a weak qunt.
Zat- Number of posts : 28872
Reputation : 86
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background :
Re: Bannies v subis
And deservedly so.
skully- Number of posts : 105969
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
tac- Number of posts : 19270
Reputation : 24
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Bannies v subis
I might put 'people of subcontinental extraction' somehwere I can easily copy and paste it from for the future.
Last edited by Zat on Thu 18 Mar 2010, 08:47; edited 1 time in total
Zat- Number of posts : 28872
Reputation : 86
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background :
Re: Bannies v subis
Or POSE for short?
skully- Number of posts : 105969
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Bannies v subis
People Of Subcontinental Extraction and Roots?
skully- Number of posts : 105969
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Bannies v subis
I think it was the shortening that caused all the trouble with some people of subcontinental extraction. Apparently shortening it means we're using it with the same invective as the BNP qunts in Soap Dodger Central have when using the word Paki.
Zat- Number of posts : 28872
Reputation : 86
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background :
Re: Bannies v subis
Back to rooting again .... will it never stop?!!
Merlin- Number of posts : 14718
Reputation : 4
Registration date : 2007-09-05
Flag/Background :
Re: Bannies v subis
I hope not!
Zat- Number of posts : 28872
Reputation : 86
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background :
Re: Bannies v subis
Although after about 15 minutes, it's often difficult to go any further,
Zat- Number of posts : 28872
Reputation : 86
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background :
Re: Bannies v subis
Aye, specially when there's cricket or footy on the Teev.
skully- Number of posts : 105969
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Bannies v subis
What?!!!Although after about 15 minutes, it's often difficult to go any further,
Not even with a 23 year old gf ?
Or is skulls making up more of his rooting stories?
Merlin- Number of posts : 14718
Reputation : 4
Registration date : 2007-09-05
Flag/Background :
Re: Bannies v subis
Not me. I have met the 23 year old.
skully- Number of posts : 105969
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Page 4 of 9 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Similar topics
» Wow! and Wow again - Bannies take loss out on Bannies
» WTF are all the subis?
» Subis sticking together
» Iggy Pop upsets 2 subis
» Waiting for all the subis to start . . .
» WTF are all the subis?
» Subis sticking together
» Iggy Pop upsets 2 subis
» Waiting for all the subis to start . . .
Page 4 of 9
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
Yesterday at 15:10 by skully
» Jesus, this place is dead (II)
Yesterday at 15:08 by skully
» Rugby League 2024
Yesterday at 15:07 by skully
» The Football (soccer) thread
Wed 15 May 2024, 09:47 by skully
» Celebrity Death List MMXXIV/The Death Thread 2024
Tue 14 May 2024, 22:01 by lardbucket
» Sheffield Shield 2024/25
Tue 14 May 2024, 10:25 by embee
» Apology
Mon 13 May 2024, 09:41 by Nath
» English Domestic Season 2024
Mon 13 May 2024, 02:21 by skully
» How far can Jimmy go?
Sun 12 May 2024, 10:07 by lardbucket