Flaming Bails
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Bannies v subis

+22
Demelza
bodyline
G.Wood
Basil
Ash
DJ_Smerk
eowyn
The One
philcric
Fred Nerk
Zat
horace
buckSH
embee
furriner
tac
taipan
CT
Merlin
lardbucket
Shoeshine
skully
26 posters

Page 4 of 9 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

Go down

Bannies v subis - Page 4 Empty Re: Bannies v subis

Post by tac Thu 18 Mar 2010, 08:06

What amuses me most is the racist undecurrent in not wanting to be called a subi . . . somehow the Bannie subis feel it putsthem in the same boat with the stupid Paks and Bangers . . . subi as an abbreviation might be deemed condescending, but subcontinental is no more racist than latin american, caribbean, sub-Saharan african, mediterranean or other term we use to describe regions instead of individual countries within the region . . .besides, the buggers are all tarred with the same brush, anyway . . .
tac
tac


Number of posts : 19270
Reputation : 24
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : pon

Back to top Go down

Bannies v subis - Page 4 Empty Re: Bannies v subis

Post by skully Thu 18 Mar 2010, 08:10

embee wrote:PS ..I use the term subi a lot less than I used to because someone politely asked me not to...
And I've hardly used it at all since all the sookin' went on. Hence my Q about would Bannies end up under the same heading.

I guess I'm just getting bored with all the PC bulltwang on here. I prefer to say what I think, which is afterall the cornerstone of forumming.

If you're a qunt then I'll call you a qunt. If people think I'm being a qunt, then let them say so. Words on a page. [awaits string of one-word posts Cool ]
skully
skully


Number of posts : 105969
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Bannies v subis - Page 4 Empty Re: Bannies v subis

Post by tac Thu 18 Mar 2010, 08:11

qunt
tac
tac


Number of posts : 19270
Reputation : 24
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : pon

Back to top Go down

Bannies v subis - Page 4 Empty Re: Bannies v subis

Post by skully Thu 18 Mar 2010, 08:14

Hehe, on queue. Cheers tac.

I'll be disappointed if there aren't at least 4 or 5 more. Cool
skully
skully


Number of posts : 105969
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Bannies v subis - Page 4 Empty Re: Bannies v subis

Post by tac Thu 18 Mar 2010, 08:17

a string of qunts? I always imagined they'd be called a quiver of qunts . . .
tac
tac


Number of posts : 19270
Reputation : 24
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : pon

Back to top Go down

Bannies v subis - Page 4 Empty Re: Bannies v subis

Post by skully Thu 18 Mar 2010, 08:18

Right now, one would make me quiver. innocent
skully
skully


Number of posts : 105969
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Bannies v subis - Page 4 Empty Re: Bannies v subis

Post by embee Thu 18 Mar 2010, 08:18

tac wrote:What amuses me most is the racist undecurrent in not wanting to be called a subi . . . somehow the Bannie subis feel it putsthem in the same boat with the stupid Paks and Bangers . . . subi as an abbreviation might be deemed condescending, but subcontinental is no more racist than latin american, caribbean, sub-Saharan african, mediterranean or other term we use to describe regions instead of individual countries within the region . . .besides, the buggers are all tarred with the same brush, anyway . . .

Being labelled a South Pacificer or Southern Hemispherian and getting lobbed in with Kiwis and Jaaps is the equivalent

It's bad enough we get lobbed in with Sozzies now
embee
embee


Number of posts : 26215
Age : 57
Reputation : 263
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background : aus

Back to top Go down

Bannies v subis - Page 4 Empty Re: Bannies v subis

Post by Merlin Thu 18 Mar 2010, 08:24

skully wrote:
Some Aussies reacted adversely to "Cons"?? PMSL. They must have been weak qunts.

I find it a term of endearment when lobbed at me from an English comrade. Cool

Which is exactly as it should be!
Anyone trying to "score points" by using the term 'Cons' in a derrogative sense these days against Aussies is only kidding themselves ... and for offence to be taken (and shown) only fuels the dare ...
If I could have a quid for everytime I've bantered with Aussie mates in pubs when they've done the "soap and baths" routine, and I/other Pom mates have retorted with the "convict offspring" riposte, I'd be a bloody millionaire right now.

Pre 2005 Ashes, Sky had a brilliant sketch involving Warne and ??? being sentenced and put on a convict ship way back in the 1800's whilst Gower and Co looked on as the judiciary ... then through a pall of smoke, the clock was fast forwarded to 2005 .. as Warne walked forward in whites flicking up a cricket ball and a glint in his eye (seeking revenge presumably) .... great theatre ... and it worked well ! Malice aforethought ? Absolute bollocks!

The irony was that you buggers lost that particular Ashes series !! Laughing

Merlin


Number of posts : 14718
Reputation : 4
Registration date : 2007-09-05
Flag/Background : afg

Back to top Go down

Bannies v subis - Page 4 Empty Re: Bannies v subis

Post by Merlin Thu 18 Mar 2010, 08:28

skully wrote:

I guess I'm just getting bored with all the PC bulltwang on here. I prefer to say what I think, which is afterall the cornerstone of forumming. democracy

If you're a qunt then I'll call you a qunt. If people think I'm being a qunt, then let them say so. Words on a page. [awaits string of one-word posts Cool ]

Bang on .... In a nutshell.

Merlin


Number of posts : 14718
Reputation : 4
Registration date : 2007-09-05
Flag/Background : afg

Back to top Go down

Bannies v subis - Page 4 Empty Re: Bannies v subis

Post by skully Thu 18 Mar 2010, 08:32

Fair call, Merls. All this sookin' and attempting to change a forummer's style or habits is a farkin tedious waste of time.

"Oh please, can't we all get along?" Boo-farkin-hoo.

The post count in here is sh!tty enough without turning it into some Facebook style love-fest.
skully
skully


Number of posts : 105969
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Bannies v subis - Page 4 Empty Re: Bannies v subis

Post by Zat Thu 18 Mar 2010, 08:38

skully wrote:"Oh please, can't we all get along?" Boo-farkin-hoo.
Exactly.

Next there'll be people rushing off to report things...

Zat


Number of posts : 28872
Reputation : 86
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Bannies v subis - Page 4 Empty Re: Bannies v subis

Post by skully Thu 18 Mar 2010, 08:40

No, shirley not. Do people do that? It would seem a very angsty thing to do.

What sort of chaps would do such a thing?
skully
skully


Number of posts : 105969
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Bannies v subis - Page 4 Empty Re: Bannies v subis

Post by Zat Thu 18 Mar 2010, 08:42

I may have done it in the very early days of this board, just to see what happens.

Spoiler:

Zat


Number of posts : 28872
Reputation : 86
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Bannies v subis - Page 4 Empty Re: Bannies v subis

Post by skully Thu 18 Mar 2010, 08:43

And deservedly so. Cool
skully
skully


Number of posts : 105969
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Bannies v subis - Page 4 Empty Re: Bannies v subis

Post by tac Thu 18 Mar 2010, 08:44

yep
tac
tac


Number of posts : 19270
Reputation : 24
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : pon

Back to top Go down

Bannies v subis - Page 4 Empty Re: Bannies v subis

Post by Zat Thu 18 Mar 2010, 08:44

I might put 'people of subcontinental extraction' somehwere I can easily copy and paste it from for the future.


Last edited by Zat on Thu 18 Mar 2010, 08:47; edited 1 time in total

Zat


Number of posts : 28872
Reputation : 86
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Bannies v subis - Page 4 Empty Re: Bannies v subis

Post by skully Thu 18 Mar 2010, 08:45

Or POSE for short?
skully
skully


Number of posts : 105969
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Bannies v subis - Page 4 Empty Re: Bannies v subis

Post by skully Thu 18 Mar 2010, 08:46

People Of Subcontinental Extraction and Roots?
skully
skully


Number of posts : 105969
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Bannies v subis - Page 4 Empty Re: Bannies v subis

Post by Zat Thu 18 Mar 2010, 08:47

I think it was the shortening that caused all the trouble with some people of subcontinental extraction. Apparently shortening it means we're using it with the same invective as the BNP qunts in Soap Dodger Central have when using the word Paki.

Zat


Number of posts : 28872
Reputation : 86
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Bannies v subis - Page 4 Empty Re: Bannies v subis

Post by Merlin Thu 18 Mar 2010, 08:47

Back to rooting again .... will it never stop?!!

Merlin


Number of posts : 14718
Reputation : 4
Registration date : 2007-09-05
Flag/Background : afg

Back to top Go down

Bannies v subis - Page 4 Empty Re: Bannies v subis

Post by Zat Thu 18 Mar 2010, 08:48

I hope not!

Zat


Number of posts : 28872
Reputation : 86
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Bannies v subis - Page 4 Empty Re: Bannies v subis

Post by Zat Thu 18 Mar 2010, 08:49

Although after about 15 minutes, it's often difficult to go any further,

Zat


Number of posts : 28872
Reputation : 86
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Bannies v subis - Page 4 Empty Re: Bannies v subis

Post by skully Thu 18 Mar 2010, 08:49

Aye, specially when there's cricket or footy on the Teev.
skully
skully


Number of posts : 105969
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Bannies v subis - Page 4 Empty Re: Bannies v subis

Post by Merlin Thu 18 Mar 2010, 08:50

Although after about 15 minutes, it's often difficult to go any further,
What?!!!
Not even with a 23 year old gf ?
Or is skulls making up more of his rooting stories? Shocked

Merlin


Number of posts : 14718
Reputation : 4
Registration date : 2007-09-05
Flag/Background : afg

Back to top Go down

Bannies v subis - Page 4 Empty Re: Bannies v subis

Post by skully Thu 18 Mar 2010, 08:51

Not me. I have met the 23 year old. Cool
skully
skully


Number of posts : 105969
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Bannies v subis - Page 4 Empty Re: Bannies v subis

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 4 of 9 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum