So Harbhajan is a Rascist is he?

please don't yell wrote:I never actually said i was sure he said it...

But either he's lying or symonds is, there are very few people in the world i would trust less than the slimy little grub that is harbi.

You see no other possibility? Misunderstanding? Miscommunication? Sheesh ...

Something was said, and Symonds reacted immediately.

It would be nice to know exactly what it was. I hope we find out ...


(Perhaps that's slightly less ambiguous than my first post on this thread).

Of course something was said.

lardbucket wrote:So you didn't say that at all?

Wait, we have the actual transcript ...

What?

It's a reference to people saying they didn't say anything (in this case, related to Flintoff), and then later being totally exposed by people annoyed at the dishonest denial

http://karthik3685.wordpress.com/2008/01/05/the-aussie-ploy-again/

Pretty much sums it up.

'Even the monkeys are bored of it'.

Just can't help himself, can he? Is that suppposed to be funny, or clever?

doremi wrote:

Zat wrote:And look, here's a special Buckeroo emoticon...

Sorry, Buckaroo but I just couldn't resist.

When a man loves a dog......

Well that tells us a lot about Buckeroo, I think.

It's also funny because in most cases, a wife isn't usually a bitch before the wedding, that usually happens after the divorce.

Pot... Kettle... White?

Nath wrote:Singh likely to escape punishment

HARBHAJAN Singh is likely to escape punishment for his alleged racial abuse of Andrew Symonds as neither umpire Steve Bucknor or Mark Benson heard anything suspicious on the field.

Match referee Mike Proctor said neither of the on-field officials were aware of the heated exchange between Harbhajan and Symonds during the final session of Saturday's play at the SCG.

"The umpires did not hear anything, they did not know anything about it," he told Channel Nine.

Interesting. So what exactly did the umpires report to the match referee? "Someone said something that upset the Aussies so you better put them in the Naughty Corner?"

Considering that the most common use of the term "subi" is in the context of something like, "subi sooks" or "cheating subis," I can well understand someone from Pakistan being offended at being lumped in with something that an Indian has done, and vice versa. In fact, I can well understand an Indian being offended at being lumped in with something another Indian has done. And you would think that an Australian would understand this, considering when someone posts a demeaning generalization about Australians we usually get tailender and a few other lifeless hypocrites complaining about racism.

bliksem wrote:.....
Considering that the most common use of the term "subi" is in the context of something like, "subi sooks" or "cheating subis," I can well understand someone from Pakistan being offended at being lumped in with something that an Indian has done, and vice versa. In fact, I can well understand an Indian being offended at being lumped in with something another Indian has done. And you would think that an Australian would understand this, considering when someone posts a demeaning generalization about Australians we usually get tailender and a few other lifeless hypocrites complaining about racism.

But subi is an affectionate term, bliks. So I keep getting told. Ergo, you must be wrong.

furriner wrote:

bliksem wrote:.....
Considering that the most common use of the term "subi" is in the context of something like, "subi sooks" or "cheating subis," I can well understand someone from Pakistan being offended at being lumped in with something that an Indian has done, and vice versa. In fact, I can well understand an Indian being offended at being lumped in with something another Indian has done. And you would think that an Australian would understand this, considering when someone posts a demeaning generalization about Australians we usually get tailender and a few other lifeless hypocrites complaining about racism.

But subi is an affectionate term, bliks. So I keep getting told. Ergo, you must be wrong.

See, you can always rely on that sensible subi, furry, to set things straight! Well played, man!

Is the hearing still on?

lardbucket wrote:Is the hearing still on?

Can't find anything on the wires. I was looking when I found the Jumbo/Woodfull story.

lardbucket wrote:Is the hearing still on?

Can't tell from here. Maybe the batteries need replacing?

Maybe it'll be postponed again ... at least until tomorrow

Does anyone doubt that Harby will get off as a peace offering to the Indians?

What did he say?

*Buckaroo* wrote:I have never heard the word subi being used with anything remotely complimentary.


Plz educate me if there is indeed anything like that ?

Subi Clark

Subiaco

it's interesting the same people doubting symonds was abused were the ones who labeled australian fans racist when south africa toured.

All we had to go on was the word of a player or two..no proof at all yet we accepted that the things had indeed been said.

bliksem wrote:What did he say?

Allegedly that Roy is a stoopid banjo monkey. I agree with the first two bits.

JGK wrote:Does anyone doubt that Harby will get off as a peace offering to the Indians?

Classic piece of setup. As I said this whole racism shebangle was an artificial controversy to deflect from the potential umpiring blasphemy.

Aye, the ICC is just the CIA afflicted by dyslexia and stupefying delays.

lardbucket wrote:Aye, the ICC is just the CIA afflicted by dyslexia and stupefying delays.