Re: So Harbhajan is a Rascist is he?

by LeFromage Sat 05 Jan 2008, 02:29

Invader Zim wrote:
Dello wrote:
Invader Zim wrote:Do people from Europe complain about being called European?

Depends who's calling us it, you dial-up spoon-bender.
Get bent, ya Eurocentric left handed wriggler.

Non-broadband sister-bothering yokel.

by lardbucket Sat 05 Jan 2008, 02:30

Let's see if he admits it, or Tendulkar admits that he knows the word was used.

If so, you can drop back to the second level defence ... it's a term of praise/affection.

by doremi Sat 05 Jan 2008, 02:30

lardbucket wrote:I repeat, this time for doremi ... did you see the incident, see the way Symonds wheeled around, and Harby immediately tried to settle the issue down?? ... it appeared he knew he had gone too far. Tendulkar came down to make the peace.

We'll see in a day, I guess. I saw it, and I thought Bhajji was reacting to being provoked by Symonds earlier, his beckoning Symonds to come to him didn't look very apologetic to me.

by Invader Zim Sat 05 Jan 2008, 02:31

Dello wrote:
Invader Zim wrote:
Dello wrote:
Invader Zim wrote:Do people from Europe complain about being called European?

Depends who's calling us it, you dial-up spoon-bender.
Get bent, ya Eurocentric left handed wriggler.

Non-broadband sister-bothering yokel.

English-type.

by furriner Sat 05 Jan 2008, 02:31

lardbucket wrote:
furriner wrote:
lardbucket wrote:>>> a lot of 'you guys' <<<

... who's that?

OK my bad. Now answer the question- how do you know Harby is guilty before he admits it? You made s statement about his being man enough etc.

Have you seen the incident?

Again I say, if he is proved guilty, ban him.

I did see that incident. Tell me what you saw in that incident which gives you the absolute conviction that Harby is guilty.

by LeFromage Sat 05 Jan 2008, 02:31

Invader Zim wrote:
Dello wrote:
Invader Zim wrote:
Dello wrote:
Invader Zim wrote:Do people from Europe complain about being called European?

Depends who's calling us it, you dial-up spoon-bender.
Get bent, ya Eurocentric left handed wriggler.

Non-broadband sister-bothering yokel.
English-type.

Touche.

by Lara Lara Laughs Sat 05 Jan 2008, 02:34

Dello wrote:
Invader Zim wrote:
Dello wrote:
Invader Zim wrote:Do people from Europe complain about being called European?

Depends who's calling us it, you dial-up spoon-bender.
Get bent, ya Eurocentric left handed wriggler.

Non-broadband sister-bothering yokel.

You could have used ben chud. It would have worked nicely within the context of the thread.

Oh, the missed opportunity.

by furriner Sat 05 Jan 2008, 02:34

tac wrote:
furriner wrote:Still does not answer the question tac- why do you lump all Indians, Pakistanis, Lankans under a catch all term? We are not the same.

subcontinental or more affectionately "subi" refers to the geographic region which you inhabit. It's merely a convenience. Get over it.

Tongana, Fijians, Samoans etc are all included in the term Pacific Islander so the precedent exists.

Affection? As in 'those cheating subis' when Pakistan is involved in a controversy? :|

Precedent? There are lots of precedents, does not mean any or all are justified.

by HH_pink Sat 05 Jan 2008, 02:35

Might help with the inquiry: http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/view/id/22

by furriner Sat 05 Jan 2008, 02:36

Invader Zim wrote:
furriner wrote:Still does not answer the question tac- why do you lump all Indians, Pakistanis, Lankans under a catch all term? We are not the same.
Who said you where?

So why refer to us under a catch all term?

On that note, who said all caucasians are the same? I don't refer to all caucasians regardless of nationality by one term.

by HH_pink Sat 05 Jan 2008, 02:36

Lara Lara Laughs wrote:
Dello wrote:
Invader Zim wrote:
Dello wrote:
Invader Zim wrote:Do people from Europe complain about being called European?

Depends who's calling us it, you dial-up spoon-bender.
Get bent, ya Eurocentric left handed wriggler.

Non-broadband sister-bothering yokel.

You could have used ben chud. It would have worked nicely within the context of the thread.

Oh, the missed opportunity.

:?:

You mean behen chod --> ben chud?

by tac Sat 05 Jan 2008, 02:36

furriner wrote:
tac wrote:
furriner wrote:Still does not answer the question tac- why do you lump all Indians, Pakistanis, Lankans under a catch all term? We are not the same.

subcontinental or more affectionately "subi" refers to the geographic region which you inhabit. It's merely a convenience. Get over it.

Tongana, Fijians, Samoans etc are all included in the term Pacific Islander so the precedent exists.

Affection? As in 'those cheating subis' when Pakistan is involved in a controversy? :|

Precedent? There are lots of precedents, does not mean any or all are justified.

Now you're being precious. Get over it, furry, you'll always be a subi so learn to live with it as best you can.

by HH_pink Sat 05 Jan 2008, 02:37

furriner wrote:
Invader Zim wrote:
furriner wrote:Still does not answer the question tac- why do you lump all Indians, Pakistanis, Lankans under a catch all term? We are not the same.
Who said you where?

So why refer to us under a catch all term?

On that note, who said all caucasians are the same? I don't refer to all caucasians regardless of nationality by one term.

We're all not even the same race, anyway.

by lardbucket Sat 05 Jan 2008, 02:38

There is no such thing as race, only racial (social) prejudice.

by furriner Sat 05 Jan 2008, 02:39

lardbucket wrote:Let's see if he admits it, or Tendulkar admits that he knows the word was used.

If so, you can drop back to the second level defence ... it's a term of praise/affection.

Why is this so difficult for you? I will be first in line to support crucifying the batsard if it is proved he said it. In the interim, you cannot crucify a man before his misdeeds are proved.

BTW the 'second level defence ... it's a term of praise/affection' thing I find ironic since some forummers say they use the term 'subi' as a term of affection.

by Lara Lara Laughs Sat 05 Jan 2008, 02:39

HH_pink wrote:
Lara Lara Laughs wrote:
Dello wrote:
Invader Zim wrote:
Dello wrote:
Invader Zim wrote:Do people from Europe complain about being called European?

Depends who's calling us it, you dial-up spoon-bender.
Get bent, ya Eurocentric left handed wriggler.

Non-broadband sister-bothering yokel.

You could have used ben chud. It would have worked nicely within the context of the thread.

Oh, the missed opportunity.

:?:

You mean behen chod --> ben chud?

Probably. I don't know how it's written.

by HH_pink Sat 05 Jan 2008, 02:40

lardbucket wrote:There is no such thing as race, only racial (social) prejudice.

Oh? You can acknowledge the difference without being prejudiced about anything.

by tac Sat 05 Jan 2008, 02:41

furriner wrote:
lardbucket wrote:Let's see if he admits it, or Tendulkar admits that he knows the word was used.

If so, you can drop back to the second level defence ... it's a term of praise/affection.

Why is this so difficult for you? I will be first in line to support crucifying the batsard if it is proved he said it. In the interim, you cannot crucify a man before his misdeeds are proved.

BTW the 'second level defence ... it's a term of praise/affection' thing I find ironic since some forummers say they use the term 'subi' as a term of affection.

So Asian, African any other geographical reference to people is bad as well?

by furriner Sat 05 Jan 2008, 02:41

tac wrote:
furriner wrote:
tac wrote:
furriner wrote:Still does not answer the question tac- why do you lump all Indians, Pakistanis, Lankans under a catch all term? We are not the same.

subcontinental or more affectionately "subi" refers to the geographic region which you inhabit. It's merely a convenience. Get over it.

Tongana, Fijians, Samoans etc are all included in the term Pacific Islander so the precedent exists.

Affection? As in 'those cheating subis' when Pakistan is involved in a controversy? :|

Precedent? There are lots of precedents, does not mean any or all are justified.

Now you're being precious. Get over it, furry, you'll always be a subi so learn to live with it as best you can.

I have tried to debate honestly tac; flip remarks I will not react to from here on, not on this thread.

by lardbucket Sat 05 Jan 2008, 02:42

furriner wrote:
lardbucket wrote:Let's see if he admits it, or Tendulkar admits that he knows the word was used.

If so, you can drop back to the second level defence ... it's a term of praise/affection.

Why is this so difficult for you? It isn't.

I will be first in line to support crucifying the batsard if it is proved he said it. maybe second

In the interim, you cannot crucify a man before his misdeeds are proved. I'm not.

BTW the 'second level defence ... it's a term of praise/affection' thing I find ironic since some forummers say they use the term 'subi' as a term of affection. Stay on topic, please

by Invader Zim Sat 05 Jan 2008, 02:42

I recent being in the same (human) race as Mudge.

by HH_pink Sat 05 Jan 2008, 02:42

Calm down, earthies. Let there be peace.

by lardbucket Sat 05 Jan 2008, 02:44

HH_pink wrote:
lardbucket wrote:There is no such thing as race, only racial (social) prejudice.

Oh? You can acknowledge the difference without being prejudiced about anything.

Or you can be honest and scientific and accept that we are all basically the same.

by tac Sat 05 Jan 2008, 02:45

furriner wrote:
tac wrote:
furriner wrote:
tac wrote:
furriner wrote:Still does not answer the question tac- why do you lump all Indians, Pakistanis, Lankans under a catch all term? We are not the same.

subcontinental or more affectionately "subi" refers to the geographic region which you inhabit. It's merely a convenience. Get over it.

Tongana, Fijians, Samoans etc are all included in the term Pacific Islander so the precedent exists.

Affection? As in 'those cheating subis' when Pakistan is involved in a controversy? :|

Precedent? There are lots of precedents, does not mean any or all are justified.

Now you're being precious. Get over it, furry, you'll always be a subi so learn to live with it as best you can.

I have tried to debate honestly tac; flip remarks I will not react to from here on, not on this thread.

Furry, there si no argument. Subcontinental is, like African, European etc just a term to describe people from a certain geographic region. That's it. It's like calling Aussies and Kiwis antipodeans . . .

by furriner Sat 05 Jan 2008, 02:46

tac wrote:
furriner wrote:
lardbucket wrote:Let's see if he admits it, or Tendulkar admits that he knows the word was used.

If so, you can drop back to the second level defence ... it's a term of praise/affection.

Why is this so difficult for you? I will be first in line to support crucifying the batsard if it is proved he said it. In the interim, you cannot crucify a man before his misdeeds are proved.

BTW the 'second level defence ... it's a term of praise/affection' thing I find ironic since some forummers say they use the term 'subi' as a term of affection.

So Asian, African any other geographical reference to people is bad as well?

For the last time tac, I am not interested in scoring debating points or making 'smart' comments. Anything can be reduced to an absurdity unless all the parties involved make an honest effort to really talk about it.

by Sponsored content