Flaming Bails
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Ashes 2013 - a question

+22
Nath
Bradman
Big Dog
tricycle
horace
JGK
Brass Monkey
taipan
Merlin
skully
Zat
Red
PeterCS
Lara Lara Laughs
Yorkie Jill
Fred Nerk
embee
Henry
G.Wood
Mick Sawyer
JKLever
lardbucket
26 posters

Page 5 of 8 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

Go down

Ashes 2013 - a question - Page 5 Empty Re: Ashes 2013 - a question

Post by horace Thu 27 Jun 2013, 05:59

Cowan needs to make some runs, fuse needs to build a technique, the gcs needs to a acquire a brain
horace
horace


Number of posts : 42595
Age : 115
Reputation : 90
Registration date : 2007-09-06
Flag/Background : ire

Back to top Go down

Ashes 2013 - a question - Page 5 Empty Re: Ashes 2013 - a question

Post by skully Thu 27 Jun 2013, 06:07

horace wrote:Cowan needs to make some runs, fuse needs is incapable of to building a technique, the gcs needs to is incapable of a acquireing a brain. Hence the latter two should have their files NTPFAA
Fixed.
skully
skully


Number of posts : 106779
Age : 113
Reputation : 247
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Ashes 2013 - a question - Page 5 Empty Re: Ashes 2013 - a question

Post by Big Dog Thu 27 Jun 2013, 08:29

skully wrote:Jayzus!!! Zumerzet 2-304 to AO 320, including a 7 wkts for 6 runs collapse. Shocked

Strange scoreline for Somerset. Extra's was the forth top score. Sids seems to be struggling on tour so far & is being eclipsed by all the other quicks. Batting lineup for the first test will be interesting. Will they risk Warner who has no form & has'nt played any warmups? I don't think Usman has done enough to get a run. I'm pretty sure Moo will open with Twatto. Haddit will keep & apart from Clarke, the lineup is open.
Big Dog
Big Dog


Number of posts : 16498
Age : 34
Reputation : 100
Registration date : 2007-09-05
Flag/Background : tig

http://bigdog.bigblog.com.au/index.do

Back to top Go down

Ashes 2013 - a question - Page 5 Empty Re: Ashes 2013 - a question

Post by Nath Thu 27 Jun 2013, 11:40

Cowan out already. So maybe Rogers, Watson and Khawaja as top 3?
Nath
Nath


Number of posts : 12263
Age : 45
Reputation : 52
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Ashes 2013 - a question - Page 5 Empty Re: Ashes 2013 - a question

Post by skully Thu 27 Jun 2013, 11:41

Will Boof give the black qunt a go?
skully
skully


Number of posts : 106779
Age : 113
Reputation : 247
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Ashes 2013 - a question - Page 5 Empty Re: Ashes 2013 - a question

Post by JGK Thu 27 Jun 2013, 11:46

Aust scoring at a run a ball!

JGK


Number of posts : 41790
Reputation : 161
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : jnt

Back to top Go down

Ashes 2013 - a question - Page 5 Empty Re: Ashes 2013 - a question

Post by JGK Thu 27 Jun 2013, 11:51

56 in boundaries so far out of 64 off the bat.

JGK


Number of posts : 41790
Reputation : 161
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : jnt

Back to top Go down

Ashes 2013 - a question - Page 5 Empty Re: Ashes 2013 - a question

Post by lardbucket Thu 27 Jun 2013, 11:53

Watson
Rogers
Khawaja
Smith
Clarke
Haddin
Faulkner
Pattinson
Siddle
Starc
Harris
Lyon

lardbucket


Number of posts : 38843
Reputation : 174
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Ashes 2013 - a question - Page 5 Empty Re: Ashes 2013 - a question

Post by JGK Thu 27 Jun 2013, 11:53

lardbucket wrote:Watson
Rogers
Khawaja
Smith
Clarke
Haddin
Faulkner
Pattinson
Siddle
Starc
Harris
Lyon

That's 12...

JGK


Number of posts : 41790
Reputation : 161
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : jnt

Back to top Go down

Ashes 2013 - a question - Page 5 Empty Re: Ashes 2013 - a question

Post by lardbucket Thu 27 Jun 2013, 11:56

Yes.

lardbucket


Number of posts : 38843
Reputation : 174
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Ashes 2013 - a question - Page 5 Empty Re: Ashes 2013 - a question

Post by JGK Thu 27 Jun 2013, 11:59

UK out for a pretty 27.

JGK


Number of posts : 41790
Reputation : 161
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : jnt

Back to top Go down

Ashes 2013 - a question - Page 5 Empty Re: Ashes 2013 - a question

Post by Nath Thu 27 Jun 2013, 12:01

JGK wrote:UK out for a pretty 27.

the standard. makes a start then gets out. not sure if he has the application (but he's not the only one)
Nath
Nath


Number of posts : 12263
Age : 45
Reputation : 52
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Ashes 2013 - a question - Page 5 Empty Re: Ashes 2013 - a question

Post by skully Thu 27 Jun 2013, 12:04

Agreed Nath. I think he has shown the ability to make decent 30s but then loses concentration.
skully
skully


Number of posts : 106779
Age : 113
Reputation : 247
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Ashes 2013 - a question - Page 5 Empty Re: Ashes 2013 - a question

Post by Nath Thu 27 Jun 2013, 13:06

same old Watson failure in the 90s
Nath
Nath


Number of posts : 12263
Age : 45
Reputation : 52
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Ashes 2013 - a question - Page 5 Empty Re: Ashes 2013 - a question

Post by skully Thu 27 Jun 2013, 13:08

[sigh] Still, better than his normal pretty 30.
skully
skully


Number of posts : 106779
Age : 113
Reputation : 247
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Ashes 2013 - a question - Page 5 Empty Re: Ashes 2013 - a question

Post by lardbucket Thu 27 Jun 2013, 13:14

I'd be very happy for him to fail 3 or 4 times in the 90s during the series about to start.

lardbucket


Number of posts : 38843
Reputation : 174
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Ashes 2013 - a question - Page 5 Empty Re: Ashes 2013 - a question

Post by skully Thu 27 Jun 2013, 13:20

Indeed, L.

Is this where the England hierarchy put a call into the Zumerset committee and ask for pies to bowled at Con for the next 2 hours, to ensure his place in the T1 Aus side?
skully
skully


Number of posts : 106779
Age : 113
Reputation : 247
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Ashes 2013 - a question - Page 5 Empty Re: Ashes 2013 - a question

Post by lardbucket Thu 27 Jun 2013, 13:21

'bowl short outside the off stump'

lardbucket


Number of posts : 38843
Reputation : 174
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Ashes 2013 - a question - Page 5 Empty Re: Ashes 2013 - a question

Post by JGK Thu 27 Jun 2013, 13:37

Nath wrote:same old Watson failure in the 90s

Last over before lunch too.

JGK


Number of posts : 41790
Reputation : 161
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : jnt

Back to top Go down

Ashes 2013 - a question - Page 5 Empty Re: Ashes 2013 - a question

Post by Red Thu 27 Jun 2013, 13:47

Looks like the poms have presented us with one of the snackiest attacks ever to feast on to lull us into a false sense of security!
Red
Red


Number of posts : 17109
Reputation : 17
Registration date : 2007-10-28
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Ashes 2013 - a question - Page 5 Empty Re: Ashes 2013 - a question

Post by lardbucket Thu 27 Jun 2013, 14:36

Clarke out for 45.

Hughes pillaging the buffet/smorgasbord.

lardbucket


Number of posts : 38843
Reputation : 174
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Ashes 2013 - a question - Page 5 Empty Re: Ashes 2013 - a question

Post by PeterCS Thu 27 Jun 2013, 15:18

And (FAC?) Haddin has stepped up to the plate and pepsimaxxed it twice already.
PeterCS
PeterCS


Number of posts : 43743
Reputation : 104
Registration date : 2008-05-23
Flag/Background : ire

Back to top Go down

Ashes 2013 - a question - Page 5 Empty Re: Ashes 2013 - a question

Post by Brass Monkey Thu 27 Jun 2013, 17:48

I've read some dodgy old comments under articles on Cricinfo - not sure if this takes the biscuit, but it's still smelling heavily of citrus:

Posted by sundar_p63 on (June 27, 2013, 12:25 GMT)
Shane Watson , Mitchell Marsh , James Faulkner , Steve Smith , Mitchell Marsh , Mitchell Jhonson , David Warner ..... All these guys did well in this years IPL , so its obvious something somewhere was wrong in OZ cricket which the players were unable to handle . Good Luck to Darren Lehman n team

Suspect
Brass Monkey
Brass Monkey


Number of posts : 44858
Age : 115
Reputation : 415
Registration date : 2007-09-02
Flag/Background : afg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HjWhbVWj9wQ

Back to top Go down

Ashes 2013 - a question - Page 5 Empty Re: Ashes 2013 - a question

Post by taipan Thu 27 Jun 2013, 18:25

Brass Monkey wrote:I've read some dodgy old comments under articles on Cricinfo - not sure if this takes the biscuit, but it's still smelling heavily of citrus:

Posted by  sundar_p63 on (June 27, 2013, 12:25 GMT)
Shane Watson , Mitchell Marsh , James Faulkner , Steve Smith , Mitchell Marsh , Mitchell Jhonson , David Warner ..... All these guys did well in this years IPL , so its obvious something somewhere was wrong in OZ cricket which the players were unable to handle . Good Luck to Darren Lehman n team

Suspect

Yeah, it's a comedy routine at times.
taipan
taipan


Number of posts : 48416
Age : 123
Reputation : 115
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : saf

Back to top Go down

Ashes 2013 - a question - Page 5 Empty Re: Ashes 2013 - a question

Post by beamer Thu 27 Jun 2013, 18:48

Nath wrote:
JGK wrote:UK out for a pretty 27.

the standard.  makes a start then gets out.  not sure if he has the application (but he's not the only one)
The Aussie Ramprakash?

beamer


Number of posts : 15399
Reputation : 74
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Ashes 2013 - a question - Page 5 Empty Re: Ashes 2013 - a question

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 5 of 8 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum