So Harbhajan is a Rascist is he?

JKLever wrote:

taipan wrote:

Pete wrote:I still cannot comprehend how someone thinks its okay to use the word because the C4 editor allowed it. Moron.

You would think the Oxford Dictionary, Academics, Intelligentsia, Historians, nationals, illuminaries etc would know a thing or two about the word Subi moreso than the C4 editor.

Well since it has been used exclusively on cricket forums as far as I see, I would doubt if they have ever heard of the term. Cretin.

Careful Taips, Pete is sole arbiter of what is rational comment and what is not.

And it only took him 16 posts to get there.

Pete wrote:

taipan wrote:

Pete wrote:I still cannot comprehend how someone thinks its okay to use the word because the C4 editor allowed it. Moron.

You would think the Oxford Dictionary, Academics, Intelligentsia, Historians, nationals, illuminaries etc would know a thing or two about the word Subi moreso than the C4 editor.

Well since it has been used exclusively on cricket forums as far as I see, I would doubt if they have ever heard of the term. Cretin.

Yet your friends argue that it is a real word used in the real world...... Bell-end!

Please ... let's leave Bell out of this else JKL might really start foaming at the mouth.

tac wrote:

taipan wrote:

*Buckaroo* wrote:

JKLever wrote:I've never seen anyone object to the word subi to describe sub-continental teams on this forum.

the objections started when Aus forumites started using it in certain context. Mostly demeaning and mocking and I dare say racist.

Something similar to Pom then?

Or convict, which gets a fair going over by many on this forum and others.

You are a muppet.

How many times has the word convict been used on this forum?? The combined total wouldn't equate to how many times you use subi in a week. Knob.

Pete wrote:

taipan wrote:

Pete wrote:I still cannot comprehend how someone thinks its okay to use the word because the C4 editor allowed it. Moron.

You would think the Oxford Dictionary, Academics, Intelligentsia, Historians, nationals, illuminaries etc would know a thing or two about the word Subi moreso than the C4 editor.

Well since it has been used exclusively on cricket forums as far as I see, I would doubt if they have ever heard of the term. Cretin.

Yet your friends argue that it is a real word used in the real world...... Bell-end!

Eh, I think they all said it is only used on the forums

So it's still okay to use the word, because it got the okay from the C4 ed.

Did "kaffa' get okayed too?

Pete wrote:

tac wrote:

taipan wrote:

*Buckaroo* wrote:

JKLever wrote:I've never seen anyone object to the word subi to describe sub-continental teams on this forum.

the objections started when Aus forumites started using it in certain context. Mostly demeaning and mocking and I dare say racist.

Something similar to Pom then?

Or convict, which gets a fair going over by many on this forum and others.

You are a muppet.

How many times has the word convict been used on this forum?? The combined total wouldn't equate to how many times you use subi in a week. Knob.

And you know this after 18 posts? You're a farkin, champ, champ.

Pete wrote:

tac wrote:

taipan wrote:

*Buckaroo* wrote:

JKLever wrote:I've never seen anyone object to the word subi to describe sub-continental teams on this forum.

the objections started when Aus forumites started using it in certain context. Mostly demeaning and mocking and I dare say racist.

Something similar to Pom then?

Or convict, which gets a fair going over by many on this forum and others.

You are a muppet.

How many times has the word convict been used on this forum?? The combined total wouldn't equate to how many times you use subi in a week. Knob.

And this from a person who has made 19 posts since 10 September

Pete wrote:So it's still okay to use the word, because it got the okay from the C4 ed.

Did "kaffa' get okayed too?

Um the word is spelt Kaffair, but as we are not racists we do not use it. Same as Paki is never used.

tac wrote:

Pete wrote:

tac wrote:

taipan wrote:

*Buckaroo* wrote:

JKLever wrote:I've never seen anyone object to the word subi to describe sub-continental teams on this forum.

the objections started when Aus forumites started using it in certain context. Mostly demeaning and mocking and I dare say racist.

Something similar to Pom then?

Or convict, which gets a fair going over by many on this forum and others.

You are a muppet.

How many times has the word convict been used on this forum?? The combined total wouldn't equate to how many times you use subi in a week. Knob.

And you know this after 18 posts? You're a farkin, champ.

Typically no statement to the question, toss-pot. How many times has convict been used?

taipan wrote:

Pete wrote:So it's still okay to use the word, because it got the okay from the C4 ed.

Did "kaffa' get okayed too?

Um the word is spelt Kaffair, but as we are not racists we do not use it. Same as Paki is never used.

okay princess leia, is subi an acceptable word?

Hey taccie, think we have a wannabee troll here?

Pete wrote:

tac wrote:

Pete wrote:

tac wrote:

taipan wrote:

*Buckaroo* wrote:

JKLever wrote:I've never seen anyone object to the word subi to describe sub-continental teams on this forum.

the objections started when Aus forumites started using it in certain context. Mostly demeaning and mocking and I dare say racist.

Something similar to Pom then?

Or convict, which gets a fair going over by many on this forum and others.

You are a muppet.

How many times has the word convict been used on this forum?? The combined total wouldn't equate to how many times you use subi in a week. Knob.

And you know this after 18 posts? You're a farkin, champ.

Typically no statement to the question, toss-pot. How many times has convict been used?

You're the know-all, go back and count them yourself. I'm sure you've got the time.

'okay princess leia'

so you're quite happy to be sexist then?

tac wrote:

Pete wrote:

tac wrote:

Pete wrote:

tac wrote:

taipan wrote:

*Buckaroo* wrote:

JKLever wrote:I've never seen anyone object to the word subi to describe sub-continental teams on this forum.

the objections started when Aus forumites started using it in certain context. Mostly demeaning and mocking and I dare say racist.

Something similar to Pom then?

Or convict, which gets a fair going over by many on this forum and others.

You are a muppet.

How many times has the word convict been used on this forum?? The combined total wouldn't equate to how many times you use subi in a week. Knob.

And you know this after 18 posts? You're a farkin, champ.

Typically no statement to the question, toss-pot. How many times has convict been used?

You're the know-all, go back and count them yourself. I'm sure you've got the time.

Well he doesn't spend much time posting.

taipan wrote:Hey taccie, think we have a wannabee troll here?

A keyboard warrior, taips, ready to battle us evildoers. He's got all the big weapons as well, "tosspot", "muppet" and "knob".

JKLever wrote:'okay princess leia'

so you're quite happy to be sexist then?

Look at taips' avatar.

yes, i've the time. for someone who uses subi as it is easier to type then sub-continental to save time. what a joke you are. you are on here 24 hours a day. now who has the time. at the end of the day you are the biggest troll here, you just make posts to rile people and yet cannot answer any of their comebacks because you have none. now go to your office in Japan and watch the next test on satellite tv.

Oh yeah I forgot, start the name calling now, because claiming someone else is a troll is the only way you have of getting off. resorting to abuse instead of answering someones questions is a clear sign of your defeat.

tac wrote:

taipan wrote:Hey taccie, think we have a wannabee troll here?

A keyboard warrior, taips, ready to battle us evildoers. He's got all the big weapons as well, "tosspot", "muppet" and "knob".

It's amazing what people will say in the safety of an internet forum.

doremi wrote:

JKLever wrote:'okay princess leia'

so you're quite happy to be sexist then?

Look at taips' avatar.

don't spoil it man

JKLever wrote:'okay princess leia'

so you're quite happy to be sexist then?

Sorry Trevor E, or is that JL Lever the ex English bowler?

Pete wrote:yes, i've the time. for someone who uses subi as it is easier to type then sub-continental to save time. what a joke you are. you are on here 24 hours a day. now who has the time. at the end of the day you are the biggest troll here, you just make posts to rile people and yet cannot answer any of their comebacks because you have none. now go to your office in Japan and watch the next test on satellite tv.

Oh yeah I forgot, start the name calling now, because claiming someone else is a troll is the only way you have of getting off. resorting to abuse instead of answering someones questions is a clear sign of your defeat.

Hey, it's GabbaDan aka Carl rackemann aka Minnesota fats aka Pete. G'day, mate. Like the new "hardman" persona . . . Trev'll be wetting himself with joy reading the above post.

tac wrote:

Pete wrote:yes, i've the time. for someone who uses subi as it is easier to type then sub-continental to save time. what a joke you are. you are on here 24 hours a day. now who has the time. at the end of the day you are the biggest troll here, you just make posts to rile people and yet cannot answer any of their comebacks because you have none. now go to your office in Japan and watch the next test on satellite tv.

Oh yeah I forgot, start the name calling now, because claiming someone else is a troll is the only way you have of getting off. resorting to abuse instead of answering someones questions is a clear sign of your defeat.

Hey, it's GabbaDan aka Carl rackemann aka Minnesota fats aka Pete. G'day, mate. Like the new "hardman" persona . . . Trev'll be wetting himself with joy reading the above post.

Was just about to say the same.

Pete wrote:

JKLever wrote:'okay princess leia'

so you're quite happy to be sexist then?

Sorry Trevor E, or is that JL Lever the ex English bowler?

Eh?

I guess the Turbanator is a term of endearment too.

Pete wrote:I guess the Turbanator is a term of endearment too.

Actually, I think this is the first time I have ever seen this name on this froum. Even less than convict.