The Royal Wedding
+29
Merlin
The One
Red
LeFromage
Chivalry Augustus
Winkle Spinner
Gary 111
eowyn
Hass
Bradman
Mick Sawyer
Henry
G.Wood
Basil
Zat
Paul Keating
Nath
JGK
Big Dog
horace
furriner
Allan D
embee
WideWally
lardbucket
skully
taipan
Brass Monkey
JKLever
33 posters
Page 3 of 10
Page 3 of 10 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
Re: The Royal Wedding
Indeed
G.Wood- Number of posts : 12070
Reputation : 99
Registration date : 2007-09-06
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
even with all the pinkos voting twice, as horace so often exhorts them to do
lardbucket- Number of posts : 38105
Reputation : 173
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
So we should boot out every government that becomes unpopular on the whim of a drunk? Howard would've been screwed about six months into his first term.
Bradman- Number of posts : 17402
Age : 65
Reputation : 35
Registration date : 2008-08-13
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
lardbucket wrote:yes, that was a decision validated in spades soon after by the entire voting population
You don't see a problem with a foreigner dismissing our government? You can't see a time when that foreigner might have a conflict of interest?
Last edited by Mick Sawyer on Thu 28 Apr 2011, 04:44; edited 1 time in total
Mick Sawyer- Number of posts : 7267
Reputation : 21
Registration date : 2007-09-11
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
he was Gough's man ...
lardbucket- Number of posts : 38105
Reputation : 173
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
lardbucket wrote:he was Gough's man ...
Relevance?
Mick Sawyer- Number of posts : 7267
Reputation : 21
Registration date : 2007-09-11
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
must have been the right thing to do ...
... as the population proved soon after
... as the population proved soon after
lardbucket- Number of posts : 38105
Reputation : 173
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
lardbucket wrote:even with all the pinkos voting twice, as horace so often exhorts them to do
it was a true proletariat decision
Is it true that whole event was started by some pinko MP not being able to resist something else pink and stinky?
G.Wood- Number of posts : 12070
Reputation : 99
Registration date : 2007-09-06
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
Probably Gough's biggest mistake. Probably just behind the steak lunch when he should've been recalling the budget from the Senate
Bradman- Number of posts : 17402
Age : 65
Reputation : 35
Registration date : 2008-08-13
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
He made so many, it's hard to pick just one.
lardbucket- Number of posts : 38105
Reputation : 173
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
Mick Sawyer wrote:lardbucket wrote:yes, that was a decision validated in spades soon after by the entire voting population
You don't see a problem with a foreigner dismissing our government? You can't see a time when that foreigner might have a conflict of interest?
If the foreigner had been a driving force rather than a rubber stamp I could see a problem
embee- Number of posts : 26214
Age : 57
Reputation : 263
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
Mick Sawyer wrote:lardbucket wrote:yes, that was a decision validated in spades soon after by the entire voting population
You don't see a problem with a foreigner dismissing our government? You can't see a time when that foreigner might have a conflict of interest?
That is utter bulltwang Mick.
A foreigner did not dismiss the Australian government. The Queen has no power to dismiss an Australian government. The Governor-General is the only person who can do that.
The Statute of Westminster ensures that the Governor-General is appointed and dismissed on the advice of the Australian Prime Minister. The Queen has the right to advise, warn and counsel on this decision, but she must ultimately accept the Prime Minister's advice.
Hass- Number of posts : 2401
Reputation : 13
Registration date : 2007-09-10
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
embee wrote:Mick Sawyer wrote:lardbucket wrote:yes, that was a decision validated in spades soon after by the entire voting population
You don't see a problem with a foreigner dismissing our government? You can't see a time when that foreigner might have a conflict of interest?
If the foreigner had been a driving force rather than a rubber stamp I could see a problem
Never heard of the executive council?
Bradman- Number of posts : 17402
Age : 65
Reputation : 35
Registration date : 2008-08-13
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
How does a Whitlam appointed GG ignoring Whitlam's Executive Council have anything to with a foreigner dismissing our govt?
embee- Number of posts : 26214
Age : 57
Reputation : 263
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
PMSL at the rabid pinkos still crying over the rightful axing of the appalling Whitlam Government. Best.Decision.Ever. And wholeheartedly (as mentioned by lardy) supported immediately after by the voting populus. Wonder how big the lump in horrie's, qmy's and Mick's throat was that day??
skully- Number of posts : 105955
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
ATT: The Queen
Dear Australian Head of State,
We would like to place ourselves at your mercy and request a stay of execution for our television program, The Chaser’s Royal Wedding Commentary.
We, like Kate, are commoners, and were looking forward to celebrating her wedding to your exalted grandson with a few affectionate observations.
To ensure that our coverage was respectful, we were only planning to use jokes that Prince Phillip has previously made in public, or at least the ones that don’t violate racial vilification laws. We've also filmed a joke about hunting grouse which we think you might enjoy.
We Australians are a simple people who don’t often get to watch that kind of pomp. The last big wedding we had here was Scott and Charlene on Neighbours. We’ve asked around, and there are at least six people in this outpost of your empire who would quite like to watch our commentary.
Please consider our plea.
We have the honour to be, Madam, Your Majesty’s humble and obedient servants,
Cheers,
The Chaser
Dear Australian Head of State,
We would like to place ourselves at your mercy and request a stay of execution for our television program, The Chaser’s Royal Wedding Commentary.
We, like Kate, are commoners, and were looking forward to celebrating her wedding to your exalted grandson with a few affectionate observations.
To ensure that our coverage was respectful, we were only planning to use jokes that Prince Phillip has previously made in public, or at least the ones that don’t violate racial vilification laws. We've also filmed a joke about hunting grouse which we think you might enjoy.
We Australians are a simple people who don’t often get to watch that kind of pomp. The last big wedding we had here was Scott and Charlene on Neighbours. We’ve asked around, and there are at least six people in this outpost of your empire who would quite like to watch our commentary.
Please consider our plea.
We have the honour to be, Madam, Your Majesty’s humble and obedient servants,
Cheers,
The Chaser
embee- Number of posts : 26214
Age : 57
Reputation : 263
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
Of course, the only Chaser that Liz has heard of is the Whisky Chaser that Phil the Greek knocks back each evening, or is that morning?
skully- Number of posts : 105955
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
embee wrote:How does a Whitlam appointed GG ignoring Whitlam's Executive Council have anything to with a foreigner dismissing our govt?
I merely pointed out that the office actually has real powers. Though the dismissal probably did a better job of proving that.
I got back to this country just in time for the republic referendum and it was only in the last couple of days of that debate that Hawke pointed out that when Hayden wanted the job he (Hawke) and he alone made the decision. As he said he probably couldn't have sold it to cabinet let alone the parliament. So maybe it's better the current system stays the same. Just unlike Gough or "Kate" they choose more wisely.
Bradman- Number of posts : 17402
Age : 65
Reputation : 35
Registration date : 2008-08-13
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
embee wrote:ATT: The Queen
Dear Australian Head of State,
We would like to place ourselves at your mercy and request a stay of execution for our television program, The Chaser’s Royal Wedding Commentary.
We, like Kate, are commoners, and were looking forward to celebrating her wedding to your exalted grandson with a few affectionate observations.
To ensure that our coverage was respectful, we were only planning to use jokes that Prince Phillip has previously made in public, or at least the ones that don’t violate racial vilification laws. We've also filmed a joke about hunting grouse which we think you might enjoy.
We Australians are a simple people who don’t often get to watch that kind of pomp. The last big wedding we had here was Scott and Charlene on Neighbours. We’ve asked around, and there are at least six people in this outpost of your empire who would quite like to watch our commentary.
Please consider our plea.
We have the honour to be, Madam, Your Majesty’s humble and obedient servants,
Cheers,
The Chaser
Is that your own work? If it is it is not bad.
Bradman- Number of posts : 17402
Age : 65
Reputation : 35
Registration date : 2008-08-13
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
Not mine ...the Chaser have actually sent that to the Queen
embee- Number of posts : 26214
Age : 57
Reputation : 263
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
So what's everybody who's not going to the wedding doing Friday night?
Bradman- Number of posts : 17402
Age : 65
Reputation : 35
Registration date : 2008-08-13
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
Not watching the wedding.
skully- Number of posts : 105955
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
Where's your spirit? (behind the bar qmy) I was actually in London (well living there) for his Mum's wedding and funeral. If I was there now I'd be leaving about now just to escape the rush.
Bradman- Number of posts : 17402
Age : 65
Reputation : 35
Registration date : 2008-08-13
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
I find the whole Royal caper tedious. And weddings are by definition tedious. So a Royal Wedding is tedious squared. Hope there's some footy on.
skully- Number of posts : 105955
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: The Royal Wedding
skully wrote:I find the whole Royal caper tedious. And weddings are by definition tedious. So a Royal Wedding is tedious squared. Hope there's some footy on.
Swans v Filth on 518 ya numpty
G.Wood- Number of posts : 12070
Reputation : 99
Registration date : 2007-09-06
Flag/Background :
Page 3 of 10 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
Similar topics
» I am going to Jeff's wedding!
» Pool on Danny's wedding
» Pull on Danny's Wedding
» The perils of prevaricating over an Indian wedding
» Game 24: Royal v Kings XI, Durban, May 1
» Pool on Danny's wedding
» Pull on Danny's Wedding
» The perils of prevaricating over an Indian wedding
» Game 24: Royal v Kings XI, Durban, May 1
Page 3 of 10
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
Today at 10:06 by skully
» Apology
Today at 09:41 by Nath
» Jesus, this place is dead (II)
Today at 02:25 by skully
» English Domestic Season 2024
Today at 02:21 by skully
» The Football (soccer) thread
Today at 02:10 by skully
» Celebrity Death List MMXXIV/The Death Thread 2024
Yesterday at 13:09 by skully
» How far can Jimmy go?
Yesterday at 10:07 by lardbucket
» Current International One Day Cricket
Sat 11 May 2024, 21:58 by skully
» AFL 2024
Sat 11 May 2024, 10:41 by Nath